KBeezie In reply to Deceptihog001 [2015-09-14 15:05:09 +0000 UTC]

Can give em only once and it's how I tend to acknowledge activity when I'm too tired to go around commenting on every person's profile .

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Deceptihog001 In reply to KBeezie [2015-09-14 15:06:20 +0000 UTC]

I hate getting llama's... I'm returning mine... Keep it and don't send me an other llama...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KBeezie In reply to Deceptihog001 [2015-09-15 03:10:06 +0000 UTC]

What if I slaughter the llama in accordance with sacrificial stature? 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KBeezie In reply to toosexyforcontacts [2014-12-22 15:23:30 +0000 UTC]

Yea well... I thought I already was... 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

toosexyforcontacts In reply to KBeezie [2014-12-22 15:44:32 +0000 UTC]

It's all good
 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KBeezie In reply to toosexyforcontacts [2014-12-22 15:46:00 +0000 UTC]

oh by the way, pretty star you got there on your name. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

toosexyforcontacts In reply to KBeezie [2014-12-22 18:46:33 +0000 UTC]

SAY WHAT?!?  how in the--you didn't do that, dude!  
     
seriously, that is SO nice & generous of you.
 
i've never had premium dA membership before...thank you so much! 
i will make you a drawing to say "thanks"~what would you like????

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

KBeezie In reply to toosexyforcontacts [2014-12-22 18:50:28 +0000 UTC]

PS: Just love the   ... The only time I seen the second one was this that I uploaded to my image site: img.xlu.be/myfetish.gif

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

toosexyforcontacts In reply to KBeezie [2014-12-22 18:56:00 +0000 UTC]

 
OMG.

That link was HILARIOUS <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KBeezie In reply to toosexyforcontacts [2014-12-22 18:57:00 +0000 UTC]

Yea It's better than Stitch saying the same... se.xlu.be/stitch_fetish.gif

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

toosexyforcontacts In reply to KBeezie [2014-12-22 19:43:53 +0000 UTC]

i'm dead lol.
 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KBeezie In reply to toosexyforcontacts [2014-12-23 01:59:56 +0000 UTC]

Her looking away just adds a cherry on top. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KBeezie In reply to toosexyforcontacts [2014-12-22 18:48:32 +0000 UTC]

That would be awesome, now go see how you can show off with the features.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KBeezie In reply to Gensdelarocide [2014-09-28 19:53:55 +0000 UTC]

Well for a while when I had my own darkroom and developed and printed my own stuff I had quite a few vintage cameras ranging from a minox up to a 5x7 large format. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gensdelarocide In reply to KBeezie [2014-09-28 20:06:46 +0000 UTC]

I read an article in one website and it said that vintage cameras were better than the modern digital kinds nowadays.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KBeezie In reply to Gensdelarocide [2014-09-28 22:30:22 +0000 UTC]

Depends on the camera and scanning equipment, as well as what your goal is in the end. It also depends on which "modern digital" one sare being compared. For example a 4x5 view camera with a high grade lens and crisp film can easily be drum scanned well beyond 100 megapixel (assuming the lens and film can even resolve details to that point, which isn't that difficult with 4x5 sized film versus 35mm). 

Likewise depending on the purpose digital can produce the same or better depending on the quality of the lens and other aspects. 

Though I will say, the manual usage of *some* vintage cameras were superior in quality of parts like the optical viewfinder being much larger or brighter and manual focusing system than most cameras now days. A Canon F1 was quite nice to use for 35mm, but so was my Hasselblad 500CM. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KBeezie In reply to PepperLady [2014-07-06 22:38:00 +0000 UTC]

Oooo Bouncing Llama.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PepperLady In reply to KBeezie [2014-07-07 17:53:27 +0000 UTC]

yupp

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KBeezie In reply to dergogo [2013-04-04 13:57:18 +0000 UTC]

Don't spam me (I've seen this same comment on several other's in your recent activity).

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KBeezie In reply to RikaYamada [2012-11-05 07:09:09 +0000 UTC]

The more the merrier

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RikaYamada In reply to KBeezie [2012-11-05 07:24:51 +0000 UTC]

haha xD yeah guess so

👍: 0 ⏩: 0