Solkku [2006-07-08 21:13:37 +0000 UTC]

Hi there! Many thanks for .

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jochra [2006-04-06 15:34:46 +0000 UTC]

see you soon.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mymy [2004-12-24 20:28:04 +0000 UTC]

Merry Cristmas!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

nolipajoli [2003-09-28 04:28:16 +0000 UTC]

*cough* having read your comment about the model in this pic ,
please allow me to disagree. As the owner of that 'level stare;, I assure you it has never 'levelled' anyone, warm blooded or not. Thank you for praising the photographer, though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

katsarloki [2003-08-23 14:00:24 +0000 UTC]

Haven't seen or heard from you in a while. Submit something already!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

spyed [2003-04-10 10:13:08 +0000 UTC]

Have you ever had a dream, that you were so sure was real? What if you were unable to wake from that dream? How would you know the difference between the dream world and the real world?

What you know you can't explain, but you feel it. You've felt it your entire deviant life, that there's something wrong with the story. You don't know what it is, but it's there, like a splinter in your mind, driving you mad.

You take the blue pill, the story ends. Your browser closes and you believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill, you stay in wonderland. And, I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.

I offer only the truth, nothing more.

Take: The Red Pill
Take: The Blue Pill

spyed, nobody has ever done this before.
I know. That's why it's going to work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

danisan [2003-04-01 02:45:36 +0000 UTC]

Seems odd for someone hovering so close to 10,000 pageviews to be MIA. How/where the heck are ya, man?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ash [2003-03-19 11:42:40 +0000 UTC]

still taking a break man?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mjar81 [2003-03-17 04:50:25 +0000 UTC]

hey man, i haven't seen you around in a while. just wondering what's up?

ttyl,
Mark

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rupertknowsbest [2003-03-15 19:34:55 +0000 UTC]

more photos please

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ash [2003-03-04 16:10:14 +0000 UTC]

hey acro, where have you got to? expected to bump into you by now

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

funkygeek [2003-02-27 23:49:45 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

contra [2003-02-17 04:13:51 +0000 UTC]

:+devwatch:

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mjar81 [2003-02-14 18:30:11 +0000 UTC]

hey man, i hope you have a great valentine's day!
i'm taking my firl out to dinner at a fancy, expensive restraunt on the water in St. Petersburg, and i got her a dozen long-stemmed red roses!
i hope that does it!

have a great day!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

hesitation [2003-02-14 15:05:20 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

angelcurls [2003-02-14 11:03:31 +0000 UTC]

this message will bring you a part of mine
in wishing you a happy valentine!

[valentine's day special - leave a message]

ailine...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lightningbolt [2003-02-11 00:17:10 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the info, the nikon one is about the same price as the minolta, so they are both expensive. I might give a flatbed scanner a try as I'm thinking most of my printing will be done from the slide anyway...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lightningbolt [2003-02-07 22:49:17 +0000 UTC]

I've got a Canon FS4000US which is supposed to be a pretty good scanner, I've just been struggling with getting results that are comparable to the actual slide, especially in darker areas like the rock at the bottom of that photograph, on the slide the rock at the bottom lis lighter, showing much more detail, yet the sky and snow is also deeper and has more richness on the slide. I'm stumped at the moment. I'm considering in a few months getting a larger film scanner, the Nikon medium format one as I have started medium format slides recently as well, it is supposed to have a higher dynamic range which might help.

You have a Minolta scanner don't you?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lightningbolt [2003-02-07 21:14:55 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for your comments on my latest shot of Mt Cook, just taking another look at the pic, I see there is more tonal range on the original slide than the deviation. I've have a feeling my scanner might be lacking in that regard...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cyrage [2003-02-06 22:48:43 +0000 UTC]

thanks for the devWatch!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kardis6 [2003-02-06 17:14:58 +0000 UTC]

+Devwatch I like your style. Also thanks for the comments glad you could spend the time checking me out.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

back2mine [2003-02-06 15:38:15 +0000 UTC]

i am
it always makes me go soft inside....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mmmmmmmmmmmmmwmmmmwm [2003-02-06 13:28:21 +0000 UTC]

cool gallery. Love those night shots
Don't ya hate it when people dont return the favor of interaction by commenting on one of your shots. but instead, just leave a "thank you for your comments" on your user page

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

hawkboi [2003-02-06 06:27:54 +0000 UTC]

Oh I did use the Neat image program. ~katsarloki suggested I try it and I really like it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

hawkboi [2003-02-06 05:48:43 +0000 UTC]

"Neat" Haven't heard that in a long while. Just saw that you had another pic that escaped my watch....mark one more mystery deviation on the watch found.

Thanx for the comment btw.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

katsarloki [2003-02-06 05:29:27 +0000 UTC]

Yeah... seems to be the right term; however, I did it manually rather than use a program to do it. The exposure was fairly even - wouldn't AE lock prevent exposure differences? But that was probably due to the night. Yeah, I used a mini tripod. A handy little thing and completely adjustable so I don't have to lug a huge one around. I just sat on the other side of the bay and snapped 3 shots inbetween the posts. I did make sure that there was plenty of overlapping happening so that I could delete the hard edge with a soft brush so that there would be no apparent joining. And, as I said, I used the transform>skew tool holding down SHIFT to line up the edges and at the same time maintaining a straight horizontal line. I'm sure this could be done to mathematic perfection with a panoramic program, but it doesn't seem to like me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

katsarloki [2003-02-06 04:20:18 +0000 UTC]

If by "stitch" you mean a combination of photos, yes. Three photos combined in Photoshop by skewing the dimensions. Thanks so much for the comment! Night shots are always pretty

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sixhours [2003-02-05 19:37:22 +0000 UTC]

Oh, no thanks necessary! I've enjoyed looking through your gallery.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sixhours [2003-02-05 16:56:28 +0000 UTC]

Whoo! I did not realize you used a Pentax, too. Good taste!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

gridlockd [2003-02-05 16:52:16 +0000 UTC]

Hey, dude!!! Thanks, mate, for the comment on my latest deivaiton. It was truelly appreciated.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

danisan [2003-02-05 14:42:48 +0000 UTC]

Ancient Chinese Secret!


No, really, those coins were part of the setup for the Chinese New Year they had at The Bellgio Conservatory. They were actually much larger than they are in the picture. "The Emperor" (remember him, the BIG guy?) was standing on those piles. Each coin was probably as big around as an extra large pizza. (Those are about 14 inches in diameter, right??) Maybe bigger than that even. I'm not great at figuring size equivalents.

And there you have it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ruahh [2003-02-05 09:03:04 +0000 UTC]

Question: did you use any extern flash to get I Am Amused By Night Shots so cleaR as it does?

I think own a good camera coolpix5000 and i cannot get somethinh beautiful as yours at nights.

I probably miss some digital knowedge though.

I should still read my camera digital manual

NIce picture again.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

danisan [2003-02-05 00:02:34 +0000 UTC]

And it appears that I did! (fool you)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

katsarloki [2003-02-04 22:31:23 +0000 UTC]

Thanks so much for the comment and comment! I really appreciate the feedback!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

nefertari [2003-02-04 18:16:01 +0000 UTC]

You have an outstanding gallery! I´m adding you to my devwatch right now!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

angelcurls [2003-02-04 17:10:45 +0000 UTC]

thanks so much for the many many comments. means a lot!

one thing to color contrasts. its only one shot, colored with a yellow, blue and red layer in ps. and i've never seen a similar work.

+devwatch, of course. you have some awesome works and i see i missed to add ya.

ailine...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

alwaysadreamer [2003-02-04 16:46:19 +0000 UTC]

... I'd never tell you to bugger off Clayton ... thank you for your suggestions and observations.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

supermario [2003-02-04 07:37:03 +0000 UTC]

thank you for a nice comment. i'm jumping into your gallery, right now!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

danisan [2003-02-04 06:25:26 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the comment.


PS It's not a macro.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

syd-barrett [2003-02-03 23:20:40 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for nice comment friend, fire is for show and draying faster
pinky

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

swampy [2003-02-01 17:52:35 +0000 UTC]

many thanks for the generous favourite. o skilled peer!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

back2mine [2003-01-31 23:34:20 +0000 UTC]

thanks Clayton

i find ilford unpredictable, but in a positive way, he he. i tried kodak t-max but was very disappointed with the colours. it was probably the printing lab's fault, i guess.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mascotter [2003-01-31 23:23:38 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful gallery. Some amazing images

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

supermario [2003-01-31 15:33:48 +0000 UTC]

thnks for a devwatch. i'm just about to go through your gallery.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

funkygeek [2003-01-31 12:03:28 +0000 UTC]

Yes Thats Right

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

augure [2003-01-31 10:29:28 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the comment on Recursion
i really appreciate it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

funkygeek [2003-01-30 02:44:54 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tripleman [2003-01-29 22:21:32 +0000 UTC]

You've got some amazing shots here. I'm a sucker for color and you've got great color in your photos. I'm gonna add you to my devwatch.

Keep up the amazing photography.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

alwaysadreamer [2003-01-29 21:02:33 +0000 UTC]

WOW ... you've blown me away! thank you SO much for the and the wonderful comment too. & a

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

achfoo [2003-01-29 18:37:04 +0000 UTC]

lol, your comment on GRACE [link] was incredibly profound. I pondered over it for hours...wondering what the deeper meaning was. Thanks, though. See you around!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0