Comments: 20
Levke-Sievert [2010-10-20 18:21:57 +0000 UTC]
For me it seems like a underwater word. I love to watch and search other details. Impressive.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Elhrrah [2009-07-13 21:32:00 +0000 UTC]
For my quick, dA quality renders, I use a quality of 15000, a filter radius of 0.4, and an oversample of 5. With the resolution I've been using lately (1200x1800) it takes just a bit over an hour.
When I do my print-quality renders, I shoot for a quality around 50000, same filter radius and oversample, at an extremely large resolution (1870x3700 for my last one).
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Elhrrah [2009-07-13 20:42:15 +0000 UTC]
What were your render settings?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AetasSerenus In reply to Elhrrah [2009-07-13 20:59:00 +0000 UTC]
I've never really been that prominent at render settings, but I set it as a quality of 2M, filter radius 1, oversample 1 I let it run around a fourth of the time. I guess the end quality was around 500k..
Any rendering tips would be greatly appreciated.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
2-3-6 [2009-07-12 23:38:25 +0000 UTC]
intrigue' I would love to know how you made this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AetasSerenus In reply to 2-3-6 [2009-07-13 20:42:08 +0000 UTC]
I used a software known as Apophyis, created by *Zueuk here on DA
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PsychoTori [2009-07-12 22:19:28 +0000 UTC]
This is so beautiful
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
shadradson [2009-07-10 19:53:17 +0000 UTC]
this is actually the coolest thing you've done!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1