Comments: 167
Angie-Pictures [2014-03-29 18:45:43 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful work! Congratulations on the DD!
π: 0 β©: 1
ArtbroJohn [2014-03-28 04:59:35 +0000 UTC]
Very nice work!
Great colors too.
π: 0 β©: 1
Rexyky19 [2014-03-28 02:58:52 +0000 UTC]
He's fabulous
π: 0 β©: 1
HarmonicSonic [2014-03-28 02:48:50 +0000 UTC]
That hair... I'm so missing the 80s now.
π: 0 β©: 1
WitheringRaven [2014-03-28 02:04:12 +0000 UTC]
He's really pretty and well drawn!!
π: 0 β©: 1
FlamingBulbinArrow [2014-03-28 01:40:30 +0000 UTC]
This looks like a character you'd see in "Cats"! Awesome work, I love the motion in the picture!
π: 0 β©: 1
NezNezz [2014-03-27 23:44:42 +0000 UTC]
Oh wow, what a nice antho! It's a very nice way to draw them, I must say. C:
π: 0 β©: 1
Penguinator24 [2014-03-27 22:39:51 +0000 UTC]
Looks great!
π: 0 β©: 1
Crono8 [2014-03-27 22:32:33 +0000 UTC]
WiedziaΕam, ΕΌe znam tego arta xD
π: 0 β©: 1
Xiomary [2014-03-27 21:53:11 +0000 UTC]
Awesome character
π: 0 β©: 1
Cherubas [2014-03-27 20:32:17 +0000 UTC]
Be careful with your anatomy. Having that index finger bending in basically the opposite direction of the middle finger looks wonky and not really possible. Other than that this is a really great drawing. I love this coloring!
π: 0 β©: 2
Cherubas In reply to VixenDra [2014-03-28 00:53:07 +0000 UTC]
Lol, you must be! I can't bend mine at that angle without being uncomfortable (definitely not how I would casually hold something), and even then I can't bend them to that extreme. The middle knuckles are almost on opposite sides from one another. Even if you can bend that way, I can promise you it's not common and it looks unnatural. XD
π: 0 β©: 1
VixenDra In reply to Cherubas [2014-03-28 02:36:43 +0000 UTC]
Hm, as for my left hand it could be because I've been trying to play a guitar for perhaps 2-3 years, but it doesn't explain my right hand doing this too...
Have you tried holding sth small and spread the fingers then? But of course, by reallife fingers this would be less 'algly', the finger will look more roundish^^
As for the look, I've seen this in a lot of artworks, especialy of such type of style. As for those by the masters, even in realism, this is kinda close: upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia⦠of course the angle is not so extreme and we can see the middle finger from the very front, but the general pose of the hand is kinda similar^^ BTW, perhaps alatherna  would like to compare and decide if she overlooked that or it's the result she wanted^^ I think I'd just change the placement of the middle finger's claw more to the middle^^ But that would be if I wanted to go more realistic, and this artwork is definitely meant to be more fantasy-like, the author is rather an anime artist, and anime seems to like stylizing(just look at anime bird wings xD they lack of anatomy for the sake of another effect), perhaps the fingers are part of a stylization here^^ There is such thing in art like 'mistakes on purpose'^^ And of course 'mistakes by mistake'. I guess only the author knows the truth here I just wanted to say it's not that impossible... and I'm adding that some styles allow some 'mistakes' for other purposes^^ Even if in this case it's just a 'mistake by mistake' I just wanted to say that some other works may have such thing made consciously
π: 0 β©: 0
collarfox In reply to VixenDra [2014-03-27 22:42:37 +0000 UTC]
i severely doubt that
π: 0 β©: 1
collarfox In reply to VixenDra [2014-03-27 22:59:40 +0000 UTC]
if only you did. because a human finger is literally incapable of twisting like that - i couldn't hold my hand that way, and when i tried to manually move my finger into that position it hurt like hell. and i have incredibly flexible fingers.
π: 0 β©: 1
collarfox In reply to VixenDra [2014-03-27 23:19:25 +0000 UTC]
eh. some people are different. but you don't use the vast minority to excuse anatomical errors. (:
π: 0 β©: 1
collarfox In reply to VixenDra [2014-03-28 18:30:03 +0000 UTC]
because style =/= disregard for anatomy. this isn't even a style that makes room for that kind of thing, especially since the rest of the anatomy is fine.
π: 0 β©: 1
VixenDra In reply to collarfox [2014-03-28 20:12:21 +0000 UTC]
Not long ago there was a DD of a wing stock.. relaistic shading and colouring... but no anatomy. I noted the DD featurer and she said it's fantasy and may lack anatomy. I bet you two could have an interesting discussion.
π: 0 β©: 1
collarfox In reply to VixenDra [2014-03-28 20:14:57 +0000 UTC]
i've seen that piece as well. it really depends on what the artist is going for, i think - you can tell when someone's going for realism or fantasy. i think this artist, despite drawing an anthropomorphic character, is still going for an aspect of realism considering their art style. therefore they should be held to realistic anatomical standards.
π: 0 β©: 1
VixenDra In reply to collarfox [2014-03-28 20:28:52 +0000 UTC]
I wouldn't consider this style realistic, rather semi-realistic. The eyes definitely don't look like aimed for realism, same with the face and the fur. I'd rather say it's a kind of cartoony style with soft shading. Just because it's a bit more realistic that yours, doesn't mean it's realistic^^
π: 0 β©: 1
collarfox In reply to VixenDra [2014-03-28 20:30:22 +0000 UTC]
there are some parts of it that are stylized; that doesn't mean that everything is stylized to the point where anatomy doesn't matter.
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>