Comments: 15
THISISAPES [2011-11-02 09:53:16 +0000 UTC]
Graffiti is no term for ILLEGAL or LEGAL, it's an unappreciated artform which unites artists from all over the world through art which only can be achieved by hard work and an incredible motivation.
You CAN'T say taggers aren't cool, tagging is an important part of graffiti, it's your trademark and it represents you as a writer.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Almond-Tea In reply to THISISAPES [2011-11-19 07:46:33 +0000 UTC]
I wrote the description for this photo a very long time ago; I do agree with what you're saying. I love street art and the graffiti culture of my city. If tagging is used as a signature, it is making the artwork recognisable to audiences as belonging to an artist, which I believe, like you, is very important. "Tagging" was used as a general term, where people use graffiti purely to vandalise property, not to express an art form, and I apologise for any offence.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cat-army [2008-12-02 01:35:56 +0000 UTC]
oh sweet are those lights on the wall?? this looks all really amazing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ashiezorz [2008-10-26 23:24:17 +0000 UTC]
There's a place in Melbourne
where people can go and do whatever graffiti art they want [:
And there are lightboxes too, so you can see it all glowy at night-time n__n.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ashiezorz In reply to Almond-Tea [2008-10-29 08:26:26 +0000 UTC]
Uhm...I don't actually know.
I don't live in Australia >< I just heard about it at school, we had a couple of local graffiti artists come and talk (they did a mural for our school's art block) and they had a whole slideshow with photos from this magical place in Melbourne!
Sorry!
xx
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Almond-Tea In reply to ashiezorz [2008-10-30 06:45:53 +0000 UTC]
Oh, that's okay!
Thank you for telling me about it anyway!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
moniquealdine [2008-04-26 00:45:38 +0000 UTC]
Either way I believe that graffiti, legally done or other wise, is a form of art that can, at times, be more expressive than paintings or photographs or any other form of art. I appreciate it wherever it may be.
Also, this is a great picture and you captured it well.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
etrurianmage [2007-06-29 06:35:19 +0000 UTC]
Well, technically (gotta LOVE that word!), 'graffiti' which has been granted permission isn't 'graffiti' at all, it's 'street art', or a 'mural', depending on the nature of the work. 'Graffiti' is the term for the stuff which is ILLEGAL.
There's plenty of interesting stuff on the way home on the trainline. But it disgusts me that people would do that, vandalise just to brag "OMG LYK I PUT MA TAG DER OMG LOL". ...>_>'
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Almond-Tea In reply to etrurianmage [2007-07-01 09:47:09 +0000 UTC]
Of course, I agree, but I wasn't exactly in the position to classify this.
Note that I put it in the "City Life" category and not in the graffiti and street art category.
Like I've said, I'm only the photographer, and if I can capture something, I'm happy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
etrurianmage In reply to Almond-Tea [2007-07-02 01:30:15 +0000 UTC]
Yyyyeeeeeeep.
Very sad that graffiti can be put in 'Citiy Life'. Ah well. Vandals everywhere.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0