HOME | DD

AlmudenaDoncelArt — Existence

Published: 2012-01-15 16:47:28 +0000 UTC; Views: 10889; Favourites: 859; Downloads: 94
Redirect to original
Description

1) Sorry I can't reply to all, but thank you everybody for all your favs and comments! I'm so glad you like my work

2) You can give your own opinion, but please, be respectful with the others. Free insulting won't give more power to your arguments.
Thanks
Related content
Comments: 375

Black-Angel-Dan In reply to ??? [2015-08-06 16:08:53 +0000 UTC]

There's no point to believe when you know it exists. Believe is the lesser state of knowing, just like thinking is the lesser state of believing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

derfs51 [2012-01-19 00:48:28 +0000 UTC]

I definitely agree with this stamp,if something is real then what more do people expect to see otherwise. but at the end of the day, everyone is entitled to their views.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Eco-Strata [2012-01-18 06:12:00 +0000 UTC]

To limit yourself to believing in the infinite and unobservable is as stupid as denying it entirely.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HADOKENHero [2012-01-18 05:38:16 +0000 UTC]

Bluntly put. No one cares who your god is.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheLooneyChick [2012-01-18 00:48:28 +0000 UTC]

Obvious statement is obvious.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Gerrard91 [2012-01-17 22:33:20 +0000 UTC]

I agree, but only partially. Beliefs can do nothing when applied to things which just "exist", although "things" can be interpreted in various ways. I would say that the possibilities of describing something are infinite. You just need to get good statements.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sagethethird [2012-01-17 22:05:03 +0000 UTC]

I LOVE THIS!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sekele [2012-01-17 21:17:13 +0000 UTC]

which is why we have the urge to gather evidence

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TKDshadow [2012-01-16 17:07:03 +0000 UTC]

Nice.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lucy-Merriman [2012-01-16 16:15:42 +0000 UTC]

Well, it depends on what "it" is. Some things are effected by the pygmalion effect (or the golem effect), especially people. For instance: when a teacher has high expectations for a student, studies show that student does better in class. Whereas if a teacher has low expectations of a student, they will do poorly.

This has been demonstrated by blind studies in which scientists told teachers that some students had scored well on an aptitude test, while others did not, and still others had scores that indicated they'd do poorly at first, but would "bloom" second semester. In truth, the students hadn't taken any tests at all, and the scientists were assigning their "scores" at random. The majority of the students fulfilled the teachers' expectations (beliefs) even though they weren't based on real test scores.

The point is, belief does make a difference, whether you believe it or not

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SteffenC-itsjustme [2012-01-16 14:59:37 +0000 UTC]

I don't believe in this stamp.

And I don't believe in this stamp being art. But who am I to say, maybe generic thoughts recycled over and over again on the same background i s art.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SapphiraTheMongoose In reply to SteffenC-itsjustme [2012-01-16 21:51:26 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

raiyning In reply to SapphiraTheMongoose [2012-01-17 11:39:09 +0000 UTC]

^ This

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Crimm-Art [2012-01-16 14:46:14 +0000 UTC]

This is obviously referring to one-eyed one-horned flying purple people eaters.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

saphiredrakken [2012-01-16 13:12:32 +0000 UTC]

I enjoy your work and effort put into making these stamps. But aren't you contradicting 2 of your previous stamps? (As if they didn't already contradict your opinions. "If you can believe in God, Let me believe in unicorns." If it doesn't matter what you believe, then why did you make that statement in the first place? What is your ACTUAL opinion on the topic? (not to mention you did insult christians with that stamp, its blatantly making fun of a religion with millions of followers.)

But thats not the one that bugs me.

"DeviantArt is a wonderful ART site that (sadly) some people use and manage in the wrong way." Not only do you have an account that uses DeviantArt in the wrong way, but it seems like posting the same stamp format over, and over, and over is Art.

I'd for once, like to know your ACTUAL opinion. And I would want you to show me its true by example.
(You can't have a stamp against DeviantArt porn, when you have an account for erotic photos of yourself.)

You're free to express your opinion through stamps, but seriously, this is DeviantART. Emphasis on the "ART." If you're going to continue posting these, (and complain about DeviantArt being about "Art.") at least put some creativity into making them. Trust me, people will respect a nice looking stamp, but these are just becoming more boring stamp cholesterol.





(I like your actual art, post more of that!)

👍: 0 ⏩: 4

Merchilla In reply to saphiredrakken [2012-02-05 11:53:26 +0000 UTC]

So, so true. What you've just said are pure words of wisdom >.<

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saphiredrakken In reply to Merchilla [2012-02-05 19:50:36 +0000 UTC]

aww, thanks! I'm just getting pretty sick of those stamps.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KiyokoJordie In reply to saphiredrakken [2012-01-16 16:40:40 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saphiredrakken In reply to KiyokoJordie [2012-01-17 01:09:15 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

artsyfartsy1998 In reply to saphiredrakken [2012-01-16 16:21:01 +0000 UTC]

Mr. Brainwash would disagree. Not that I care about his opinion.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saphiredrakken In reply to artsyfartsy1998 [2012-01-17 01:09:10 +0000 UTC]

XD that comment made my day

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

artsyfartsy1998 In reply to saphiredrakken [2012-01-17 01:39:22 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! He really bothers me, though. It isn't art!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saphiredrakken In reply to artsyfartsy1998 [2012-01-17 04:01:41 +0000 UTC]

Well actually, its a she. And yet despite her stamps, she has a whole account for Erotic photos of herself.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

artsyfartsy1998 In reply to saphiredrakken [2012-01-18 03:49:55 +0000 UTC]

What? Are you talking about the guy in Exit through the Gift Shop? 'Cause I am.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saphiredrakken In reply to artsyfartsy1998 [2012-01-19 00:22:08 +0000 UTC]

Oh I was speaking about the artist who posted the stamp. I am quite a fan of Banksy though. He knows what art truly is.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

artsyfartsy1998 In reply to saphiredrakken [2012-01-19 03:38:57 +0000 UTC]

He really does! Why do people say he's a sell out? He makes no money!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saphiredrakken In reply to artsyfartsy1998 [2012-01-19 12:22:48 +0000 UTC]

I believe people call him a sellout because of his gallery showings.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

artsyfartsy1998 In reply to saphiredrakken [2012-01-20 00:48:02 +0000 UTC]

(Sorry, this is not directed at you, but I'll rant anyway) Seriously, people? He's an artist! Lots of artists have galleries! You don't call them sell outs!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saphiredrakken In reply to artsyfartsy1998 [2012-01-20 00:49:34 +0000 UTC]

I completely agree.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Snivelly1997 In reply to saphiredrakken [2012-01-16 15:12:42 +0000 UTC]

I agree with you. Whether or not stamps are art is another debate, but posting the same stamp with a different message most definitely ISN'T art. Not to mention the hypocrisy. Why is this "artist" on the top page everyday?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saphiredrakken In reply to Snivelly1997 [2012-01-17 01:08:55 +0000 UTC]

It really doesn't make sense when you think about it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ReasonableRobot [2012-01-16 11:55:07 +0000 UTC]

a lot of these stamps are incredibly subjective....
not sure why, but i feel as if you're coming off as overopinionated.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Orceh [2012-01-16 07:27:09 +0000 UTC]

I assume you're talking about god, since... your other stamp mentions him.

I would have to disagree.

Let's say this stamp IS about god, and let's say for the sake of this argument, god is really real. ... If you don't believe in god... you won't go to heaven, yes? So... in reality, it WOULD matter if you believed in him or not, because the alternative would be a place you don't really want to go.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ShugarSketch [2012-01-16 07:15:08 +0000 UTC]

You keep posting these stamps every single day. Why aren't you spending time on your real art? That's much better than these.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hikari-Dareigan In reply to ShugarSketch [2012-01-16 10:09:10 +0000 UTC]

Because she can post whatever she damn well pleases and she doesn't determine if they get frontpage'd or not. :]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ShugarSketch In reply to Hikari-Dareigan [2012-01-16 17:34:19 +0000 UTC]

I didn't say anything about it getting frontpaged. These stamps just take away from her time to make real art.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DigiAnubis [2012-01-16 01:48:36 +0000 UTC]

Hmm... Yes that is true. Though, most intangible things, such as love or god, you do have to believe in it for it to effect you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

eJcalado [2012-01-16 01:40:33 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I've toubles making people figure this out.

They say: "Oh, but if I believe that blablabla is real, than it's real for me!"

¬¬

If there's a chair, it exists regardless of what people think about it...
The same works with deities, but people don't get it.
Bhuddists can't be right if Christians are, nor can Muslims be right if Hindus are.
People should always respect others point of view, but they've got to pick one side to be in.
If any religion is right, just one of them can logicaly be real. So people should choose wisely.


--
66 books
Written for more than 2000 years
By dozens of authors, from kings to farmers
In 3 languages
Yet, it's the most coherent library of history with the very same approach of diverse topics.
it's the Bible, which could not be written like this without divine aid.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Fumpig [2012-01-16 01:15:43 +0000 UTC]

No shit, Sherlock.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Cheval4 [2012-01-16 01:10:03 +0000 UTC]

Why can't I stop thinking about unicorns?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ninjacat234 [2012-01-16 01:05:18 +0000 UTC]

It true actually....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RoyalHeather [2012-01-16 00:51:07 +0000 UTC]

Maybe it doesn't matter to whatever's reality is in question, but it matters to YOU. We live our entire lives based on our beliefs. What we choose to believe in defines our actions, our thoughts, our very motives. A man who believes he's got six months to live will act very differently from a man who believes he's got sixty years.
Beliefs DO matter. On the human plane, they matter more than anything else.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lucy-Merriman In reply to RoyalHeather [2012-01-16 16:17:01 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Hisansa [2012-01-16 00:30:53 +0000 UTC]

Not really. If something exists but is unknown, and no one believes in it, it doesn't really exist until someone knows it exists. Even then, if say one person found out that ghosts existed, didn't tell anyone, and continued to not believe in them, despite personal encounters, they would still not really exist.

In order for something to exist, living things must acknowledge that they exist, or else you can't say that they exist, and therefore they don't exist.

The opposite however is not true. If something really doesn't exist, and people try to acknowledge it's existence, despite not having any proof that it exists, then it simply can not exist. If it exists, one must be able to prove, even to non-believers, that it exists.

Believing in something's existence is another thing altogether, as that is simply having faith that something exists despite one's lack of proof. It is this faith that allows for things that don't exist the possibility of existence.

It's a whole messed up truth.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lucy-Merriman In reply to Hisansa [2012-01-16 16:22:28 +0000 UTC]

I don't understand your first paragraph. Like, for example, there are planets we haven't discovered exist yet; does that mean they don't exist? If they don't exist, how could we possibly discover them?

Are you saying Pluto did not exist until 1939 when "living things" discovered it? I don't think, as you say in your last paragraph, that Pluto was allowed to exist because people had faith it existed (or might exist). It just existed. It existed before Earth. But that seems like a weird statement to make, so maybe I'm really misunderstanding what you're saying? I'm confused.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hisansa In reply to Lucy-Merriman [2012-01-17 02:07:07 +0000 UTC]

Well, not really, it's more of a really philosophical thing really.

I suppose what I mean is giving something a name is really giving it acknowledgment of it's existence, if there is proof of it's existence. Until then, it exists physically, but not in the minds of everything that doesn't know of it's existence.

Does that make more sense?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Monjaru In reply to Hisansa [2012-01-18 05:40:46 +0000 UTC]

Technically, you're right. But only in a specific, rather useless context.

Yeah, if no living creature (with the capability of communicating with humans) yet knows about any given thing, we can't actually PROVE that that something exists, but that doesn't mean that it DOESN'T exist. Just that we haven't discovered it yet.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hisansa In reply to Monjaru [2012-01-18 12:49:51 +0000 UTC]

That's what I said.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Monjaru In reply to Hisansa [2012-01-18 18:30:53 +0000 UTC]

Minus the acknowledgement that the way you were using the term "existence" was irrelevant and useless to the conversation.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hisansa In reply to Monjaru [2012-01-19 01:46:44 +0000 UTC]

I'm the type that has a difficult time explaining what I mean when I try to dumb things down so that everybody can understand. It backfires on me and then nobody understands.

It's a curse, I think. You seem like an intelligent person, so I'm sure you know the feeling, unless your the type who's good at teaching.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>