Comments: 15
AluStaire In reply to Taures-15 [2013-08-11 13:09:36 +0000 UTC]
How do you mean that?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AluStaire In reply to Taures-15 [2013-08-17 14:51:00 +0000 UTC]
Thank you so much.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TinyFeatherpants [2013-01-23 17:45:07 +0000 UTC]
It looks more like a kookaburra. I guess kkookaburras are truely a member of the kingfisher family.
Its injured and has a broken beak.. poor thing.
But theres still enought beak left to eat. Its the best for it to life in the zoo. Where it can life a happy and long life.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AluStaire In reply to TinyFeatherpants [2013-08-11 13:10:24 +0000 UTC]
Yes, for this time it's better that it lives in the ZOO.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The-Dude-L-Bug [2013-01-21 16:53:53 +0000 UTC]
It's a very nice shot,
but I think there is an error on the ID.
There is a notable deformity to the end of the upper portion, but the beak is one of the keys.
It's much too thick & heavy for it to be A. Atthis.
It is a member of the Kingfisher family though.
The dark brown upper/cream lower beak, light colored eye, off white body with dark brown or grey at the wing/body leading to blue with white & black marked flight feathers...
I believe this is a northern Aussie tree kingfisher known as the Blue-winged Kookaburra (Dacelo leachii)
(It's likely a male from the darker patches on the wing at the body).
👍: 0 ⏩: 0