Comments: 20
Zuneperry22 [2011-08-10 01:21:54 +0000 UTC]
"I'm new soul " reminds me of that song
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
BurlapZack [2008-02-19 19:18:22 +0000 UTC]
The ghost of Charlie Chaplin wanders valiantly forward.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
whydoidothis [2008-02-07 21:55:53 +0000 UTC]
oh dear what lens was this?
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Andross01 In reply to whydoidothis [2008-02-07 22:10:32 +0000 UTC]
80-200 2.8
I'm buying the 85 1.4 soon though *finally*
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
whydoidothis In reply to Andross01 [2008-02-08 00:27:46 +0000 UTC]
was it the school's or did you buy one?
nice, thats a good investment for you, good choice!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Andross01 In reply to whydoidothis [2008-02-08 03:04:36 +0000 UTC]
It's the school's. It's a nice lens, but I don't think I'll ever buy one. I just needed something longer for portraits. 85 fits the bill perfectly.
I think 14-24 will come after that (though it'll probably take a while). And now I'm drooling over the D3...I got to play with Morrison's, it looks like ISO800 on my D200 when shooting at ISO6400. Hell, ISO12800....so sexy.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
whydoidothis In reply to Andross01 [2008-02-08 04:32:40 +0000 UTC]
yah, the d3+200 f/2=one of the more amazing night/indoor shooters ever created...its a great combo...
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Andross01 In reply to whydoidothis [2008-02-08 04:39:28 +0000 UTC]
Oh yeah, 200 f/2. Sexy....it'll probably be a buy in the long distant future.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
whydoidothis In reply to Andross01 [2008-02-08 05:53:31 +0000 UTC]
lol, what the heck do you need it for? its for indoor sports and such, although it would make an amazing street lens assuming you would lug it around and have bodyguards...
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Andross01 In reply to whydoidothis [2008-02-08 21:10:39 +0000 UTC]
Who gives a shit if I NEED it!
*really crazy portraits with whacked out bokeh of course*
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
parachutecity [2008-02-04 05:15:52 +0000 UTC]
are you reading the stranger?
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
MarkPotato [2008-01-31 17:55:54 +0000 UTC]
You directed the photography for "The Fountain" didnยดt you?
๐: 0 โฉ: 0