HOME | DD
Asujoll β Total Drama Cliques vs Cliques Edgic
#arthur #asa #boonie #dale #drama #finneas #fortune #goldie #juliette #kenny #lola #orwell #patrick #peach #roana #sanjay #taylor #total #trevor #woody #yorkie #yazz #vs #cliqes
Published: 2015-11-11 00:49:47 +0000 UTC; Views: 2580; Favourites: 2; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Wow I can't believe this season continued in just the way I would have written itRelated content
Comments: 81
THEN FINISH THE EDGIC MOIT
π: 0 β©: 1
I don't necessarily consider any of that worthy of a P tone. Anyone could say or do things like that and not necessarily be positive.
Orwell was on the border of MOR and CP for me, but he lacked any real positivity in this episode, and everyone else highlighted his flaws more than anything.
Patrick lacked any real moments of depth in this episode, hence the MORN.
π: 0 β©: 0
Dale had a noticeable amount of PSPV, hence the mixed edit.
I almost had Peach as OTT, but she didn't feel quite over-the-top enough to justify it. I am surprised that Peach was intentionally N in this though.
Trevor's positivity was so subdued in this episode that it didn't feel like it warranted a P tone for him. His scenes with Juliette highlighted her positivity more than his.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
Lol, I meant intentionally on your part. In the first episode you told me her N tone wasn't intentional on your part, but I guess this time it was?
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
Well, Peach is made ever so slightly more tolerable by the fact that the characters in-universe are just as annoyed by her as I am. Same is starting to apply to Yorkie. Boonie's still the worst, but I think that's the intention? You said you wanted to avoid double standards here, and he upholds double standards.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
Oh, was it not intentional with Boonie? How he treats Woody like he killed a man for punching Roana, but doesn't care if Woody hits a guy? I thought you were just embracing that Boonie is awful like you were with Peach and Yorkie.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
Ah, okay. No one in the story seemed to have a problem with Boonie, so I wasn't sure.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
Fair enough. And glad to be of help.
π: 0 β©: 0
I found that Juliette lacked tone completely in this one.
Alol, and here I thought you were just trying to avoid the obvious edits with Patrick.
I found that Sanjay had more OTT moments than he had MOR moments in this episode, even outside of the elimination scene.
Considering she's supposed to be a meek, shy, socially inept girl, that's exactly what I would expect for her to do. Actually I meant "forced" more as in "so we don't have yet another cutesy P-toned Asian girl", assuming she isn't P for like the rest of her time in the game.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
Be he N or M, Patrick is a fun character.
I feel like, had this more confident side of Yorkie been given more screentime or buildup, instead of just one previous scene, it might have sat better with me, because it felt like it came right the heck out of nowhere just because the narrative needed a last-second reason to get rid of Finneas. Had Boonie pointed out that Finneas was a physical liability, I'd still roll my eyes at the last-second flip, but at least it'd be more believable coming from Boonie than from Yorkie.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
I'd imagine so
Aw come on, really? She can't even own up to it? Gross.
The fact that she was middle of the road and negative. Her occasional bits of PSVP didn't make up for all the N lines
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
I've considered it, but I have no place in any of my current casts for one at the moment.
How did she not know she could do that? Role playing is her life.
I don't see it.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
Including HP, AP, EP, CP, and All-Stars, I have nine.
I'm not sure when the next time I'll be free for that is. Maybe today, maybe not. Not sure.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
Sometimes I drop characters in favor of better ideas, so if I find a way for this to work, I just might use it.
Welp.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
The feeling of replacing characters, or the feeling of "Welp 
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
Out of curiosity, have you ever regretted not having ideas/room for a character that people seemed to like, but their cast was replaced?
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 2
Huh. In that case, I'm glad I don't post my casts as soon as I come up with them, because I do tend to make a lot of changes between conception and reveal.
π: 0 β©: 0
Huh. In that case, I'm glad I don't post my casts as soon as I come up with them, because I do tend to make a lot of changes between conception and reveal.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
Arthur's N was just barely present, but I don't feel like he had enough positivity to balance out for an M.
I almost gave Goldie an N but didn't feel like she was negative enough for one. She definitely wasn't CP, though.
Orwell's N came from how everyone constantly mentioned how perverted or useless he was.
I don't see Yazz as MORM at all. OTTM maybe if you stretched a little, but I don't see the MOR.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
True, but Fortune and Patrick also revealed personal information about themselves, so why don't theyΒ qualify for MOR?
My guesses:
Jocks: Woody
Nerds: Boonie
Oddballs: Orwell
Preps: Sanjay
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
So how on Earth did Yazz's OTT gimmicky side not outweigh the depth, especially since, as I recall, Fortune revealed more about herself than Yazz did?
Can't wait.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hidden by Commenter
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah, I just don't see it. I'll just take it as shilling and probably put Yazz in a higher likelihood of winning for my next update.
π: 0 β©: 1
I think in that case we both have VERY different ideas of what character shilling is, but ok.
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>