HOME | DD
BardockSon β Bardock Meme
Published: 2012-12-01 23:11:51 +0000 UTC; Views: 7529; Favourites: 115; Downloads: 25
Redirect to original
Description
It's true.Related content
Comments: 53
...And with Vegeta and Broly in existence, this is saying something.
π: 0 β©: 0
This moment was the only thing that made that short worth watching. Goku's got nothing on his old man
π: 0 β©: 0
No it isn't, it's from a manga by Bardock fangirl, Bardock died along with planet Vegeta
π: 0 β©: 0
Slow walking of badassery. The only way this could be made better was if he had a coat. Awesome intensifies with coats.
π: 0 β©: 0
Actua- nope. Can't argue with that one. :I
π: 0 β©: 0
Imagine if Goku had died, and Bardock survived his planets destruction.
π: 0 β©: 0
Too bad it's not canon, Bardock is a great character<3
π: 0 β©: 1
It's canon
π: 0 β©: 0
But it is lol, Super Saiyan Bardock is already confirmed for DragonballZ Battle of Z :3
π: 0 β©: 1
So? Just because he's in a video game doesn't make it canon. There's also a SSJ 3 Vegeta, TrunksΒ and Broly in Raging Blast and Heroes.
It's nothing more than a fan service.
π: 0 β©: 1
Lol those were unlockable bonus characters, not even part of the main story line. Bardock will be. Watch this www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9f1A1β¦ maybe it will change your mind. Also this episode comes with DBZ kinect, which is a licensed Dragon Ball Z product. Soooooo yeah
π: 0 β©: 1
Episode of Bardock is not canon. Simple as that. Again, so what? Just because it came with some game doesn't make it valid.
It's nothing more than a what-if story.
π: 0 β©: 1
Then what's the point of producing it? Why would Akira Toryiama spend time on a project that wouldn't expand his universe. Bardock is the legendary Super Saiyan described in Saiyan lore, his story makes everything connect.
Such as the fact that Frieza was so afraid of the Saiyans power it was all because his ancestor Chilled, was demolished by Bardock, and when Chilled died he told his crew/family to beware of a creature called a Super Saiyan. Thus creating the lengend of the Super Saiyan. It also shows how Goku was able to transform relatively easy, compared to Vegeta or Trunks. And gives us the Sayian's origin on planet "Plant" (Planet Vegeta's original name). Also in the ending credits of the episode where the executive producers are listed it says "Akira Toryiama" and in my book anything created by the creator pf the series is canon.
The story of Bardock literally makes the entire Saiyan's history and universe connect.
Nuff' said.
π: 0 β©: 1
No it doesn't. All it does is raise more questions and contradicts the story. Here's the deal about Akira, he did NOT wrote this, only helped designed Chilled, that's all. His involvement was minimal, even less than with GT.
Let me give you a rundown on exactly why it's not canon and why it doesn't make sense as a whole:
- There is no reason given on how Bardock was able to travel back in time. It was very apparent that he DIED. If Frieza's blast made it happen, why is Bardock the only one to get sent? There was NO explanation whatsoever.
- The time traveling rules are already established in Dragonball lore. Trunks has already laid the pathway. In Dragonball's case, once you go back in time, the future you came from is unchanged. It only creates another timeline. Whatever Bardock does in the past, it's not going to affect the future he came from. Hence, Frieze wouldn't even know the Legend of the super saiya-jin.
- What happened to Bardock's Kanassian foresight? Did it just magically disappear? Kinda like him going back in time. Again, it contradicts the fact of it being a curse to him making him witness the downfall of saiya-jins. And why didn't he get the vision of becoming a SSJ it that was the case?
- Legend of the SSJ is that once there was a saiya-jin so powerfull, he became SSJ and he could ONLY maintain in in his Oozaru form and he was so crazy with power he ended up destroying himself along with the planet. Now for the sake of argument, let's say it was Bardock who turned SSJ Oozaru. According to manga, he destroyed himself ALONG with a planet. Now it's only logical to conclude that it wasn't on planet Vegeta/Plant otherwise it wouldn't even exist. See the fallacy.
This is about as canon as an average DBZ movie. It doesn't connect anything as it's nothing more than a spin-off.
Nuff' said.
π: 0 β©: 1
But the movies are canon.
π: 0 β©: 1
No they're not. Only two specials that are considered canon are; Bardock the father of Goku and The history of Trunks.
π: 0 β©: 1
Canon isn't even a real term. It's something the fans created to help better understand Dragonballs' timeline. So weather something is "canon" or not does not determine it's validity to the series, I believe anything that was worked on by the creator of the series is an official part of the Dragonball timeline. If Akira helped with "The Episode of Bardock" no matter how little then it's official. And unless Akira nullifies a part of the series like he did with Dragonball GT, by releasing different material, the material in this case being the "canon" movie, "Battle of the Gods" then anything he worked on is official in my book.
P.S. How long did it take you to write that huge message, like an hour? Because I find it extremely amusing the lengths you're going through to try to prove my opinion wrong. XDΒ
π: 0 β©: 1
It's funny how you take the "canon isn't a real term" route when facing a conundrum. Canon is a very real term, saying otherwise is as absurd as saying SSJ Bardock is canon. The word was not made up to understand Dragonball's timeline. Where did you pull that notion from? See, unlike you I use facts and reason to determine the canonicy, which is not synonymous with validity.Β As it is with the word 'official'. Every Dragonball product is official. Not every official product is part of the main continuity.
Your opinion =/= Fact.
P.S. That "huge" message is a list of inconsistencies that you might want to read again since you either can't see the obvious contradictions or just refuse to believe due to your narrowness. It didn't took more than 4 minutes to write that. I'm a thoughtful person, so that's really not hard for me. However If it's too much for you, simply tell me and I'll try and shorten my comments so you can keep up.
π: 0 β©: 1
Thanks I appreciate that, but I need no handicap. Sorry I can see you didn't understand my previous comment. I didn't mean that canon is not a real term, as it is indeed a real word. What I meant was it is being misused to define "validity" here is a definition of canon -> www.google.com/#fp=64345d30ae3β¦ now let me give you a fictional scenario. (I'll use simple words so you can keep up) If you were working on a piece of art, and your friend came along and helped, wouldn't it still be your art at the core? (it's fictional because you have no friends). Now doesn't this scenario represent how a manga artist would bring a movie into production, using his core art and a lot of storyboard artists, music directors and other people to help him. But it's still his art and it's still official.
Again I find it hilarious the time you spend, and the "thought" you put into these comments. And I can't believe that you haven't figured out that this is a -> www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hDIw-β¦ <-
π: 0 β©: 1
Loosing an argument so naturally you resort to ad hominem and the clear desperate way to subtlety with your poor attempt at using logic. "Insults" that are clearly a designed as a way for yourself to feel superior.Β With that logic, Dragonball evolution is canon because Akira designed the characters. It's as dense as it is dull. Clearly you're more comfortable with that line of thinking.
"I'll use simple words so you can keep up"
Be a little more creative and original. Half of my points you didn't even address or simply ignored them because in your little head you want Bardock to be a SSJ. Or course you will make your best to make him relevant and make it look like "I can't keep up with your imaginary world.
Which of course is a formal fallacy that is committed when a categorical syllogism has a positive conclusion, but false premises.
Like you yourself suggested, I as a thoughtful man backed up by evidence and reason put thought into my wordings while you make affirmative conclusion from a negative premise. Nice of you to admit.
"O and btw I was just trolling you, I'm not that stupid."-> Is essentially how you came of trying to make yourself look like you had a chance to begin with. Don't kid yourself and more importantly don't take others for fools. But I didn't expect much from a little kid who like most of them, think you know everything and if you get pummeled by reason... Use the "I was just trolling" excuse.
Not impressive, but I admire your dedication.
Care to try again?
π: 0 β©: 1
Oh by all means continue, with your victory ramble. I'll just kick back and continue laughing my ass off at you.
Retard, your just making my day.
π: 0 β©: 1
Thanks for correcting my grammar, everyone makes mistakes (like when your parents had you) 
π: 0 β©: 1
As long as I can make you happy.
Insulting an faking amusement only displays your desperation of trying to cope with reality of having lost.
You have anything else to add, maybe something... clever and original?
π: 0 β©: 1
Faking amusement? No no no no dear sir. I just find it funny how try-hard you are. Now you're just making yourself look like a -> www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PDJcw⦠<- Now if you'll excuse me I have a life to get back to.
π: 0 β©: 1
Basic psychology 101. You're not fooling anyone kid.
I've also asked for something original and clever, so I'm baffled on why you want to leave if I amuse you to no end.
Contradicting yourself yet again.
π: 0 β©: 1
Considering I have college classes, a job, and friends. I don't have time to sit here, so I bid you adieu. Adios amigo, it was fun while it lasted. I'll leave this to you as a memory -> www.youtube.com/watch?v=BROWqj⦠<- watch it and remember how you got trololololololol'd. 
π: 0 β©: 1
I thought you said you have a "life"?
Why did you reply if you consider yourself such a busy individual?
By the way, still waiting for something original and clever.
π: 0 β©: 0
He was the greatest super saiyan before he even transformed.
π: 0 β©: 0
It'd be awesome if Bardock accidentally goes forward through time into Future Trunks timeline. That'd be quite hilarious to find such a Badass Saiyan who looks so much like Goku, replace the mentor that was Future Gohan XD
π: 0 β©: 0
My favorite character of Dragon Ball... great bardock
π: 0 β©: 0
I don't understand... it was the least badass super saiyan ever. Or are you kidding..?
π: 0 β©: 0
Team Four Star FTW!!!!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>