Comments: 32
alligator83 [2024-09-02 13:07:33 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 1
LordOmegaZ [2014-11-27 23:16:04 +0000 UTC]
dat front armour (glacius?)
π: 0 β©: 1
Baryonyx62 In reply to LordOmegaZ [2014-11-28 15:56:06 +0000 UTC]
Glacis plate.
The IS-3 has a so-called pike-nose, because on earlier tanks like T-34 and IS-2 shots that bounced on the front plate would sometimes go up and into the turret bottom or mantlet, causing damage. With the pike nose style armour, shots hitting the front are sent to the sides instead.
π: 0 β©: 0
LittleBigAias [2013-09-17 07:36:51 +0000 UTC]
Ura! XD
π: 0 β©: 1
Nasa15 [2013-09-04 21:20:33 +0000 UTC]
The Russian World of Tanks site? WOW!!! Looks pretty awesome. I like how you maed it with the mobile turret. very cool.
π: 0 β©: 1
Baryonyx62 In reply to LittleBigAias [2013-09-17 20:01:16 +0000 UTC]
You don't need to read russian, with common knowledge and maybe google translate you should find your way to the PDF file, the rest is nicely explained in schemes, so you don't need to read anything there either.
π: 0 β©: 0
Baryonyx62 In reply to LittleBigAias [2013-09-17 20:03:13 +0000 UTC]
The turret of a tank is the round part with the gun that moves when the tank aims.
Now what I did was making the turret of the model tank moveable by putting a toothpick into the hull to put the turret on so it can move without falling off.
π: 0 β©: 1
Baryonyx62 In reply to Shay-Tank-Dragon-41 [2013-09-01 18:52:09 +0000 UTC]
One of the last heavy tanks in the world. Stalin wanted it although everyone said that it's a bad vehicle...
π: 0 β©: 2
RTJDudek In reply to Baryonyx62 [2013-10-21 18:13:05 +0000 UTC]
Because it had too weak engine compared to overall weight. As a result, Bolshies got tank with thick armour and potent gun, which lacked maneuverability and used same amount of fuel like whole platoon of T-34 tanks.
π: 0 β©: 1
Baryonyx62 In reply to RTJDudek [2013-10-21 19:23:04 +0000 UTC]
Well true but I guess without Stalin the nazis would have won against the western allies or the victory would have taken a lot longer.
π: 0 β©: 1
RTJDudek In reply to Baryonyx62 [2013-10-21 19:57:40 +0000 UTC]
I agree, Stalin's involvement made the combat in the Western Front much easier for the Western Allies. Though we cannot forget about victims of communist totalitarianism - think about people from DDR suffering under communist yoke. I read they had equally bad nightmare in commie shackles like we Poles did between 1939 and 1991.
π: 0 β©: 1
Baryonyx62 In reply to RTJDudek [2013-10-21 20:36:30 +0000 UTC]
Yes. My relatives were from western Berlin / western Germany so I cannot tell from real experiences but striking down peaceful protests with tanks is probably not very good for the social climate in a country.
Yet all dictators had good and bad sides about their reign. This is what we have to face. Looking at one side's propaganda just gives us one side of the medal.
π: 0 β©: 0
Baryonyx62 In reply to Shay-Tank-Dragon-41 [2013-09-01 20:22:20 +0000 UTC]
True too but with all the evil that was done by dictators - we have to face that they did things that we still rely upon today and that benefited infrastructure. The nazis established postal codes and built motorways for example. Would that mean that germans should not use the motorway and not write letters to show respect for the victims of world war two?
π: 0 β©: 1
Shay-Tank-Dragon-41 In reply to Baryonyx62 [2013-09-01 20:30:28 +0000 UTC]
Yea indeed lol when the British ruled Ireland for 400 years, we won our independence in 1921...well...75% of our independence XD N.I is till in the UK but the British helped establish some of our cities here XD
π: 0 β©: 0