Comments: 30
Antonek7 [2022-07-17 13:25:26 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
AnhedonicAuthor [2017-04-04 13:19:17 +0000 UTC]
I really love the concept of The Three Little Pigs as pokΓ©mon. Do you still intend on doing the final evolution?
My personal idea for a name is Bortar/Boartar (Boar + mortar), but it is your idea. Can't wait to see it, if/when it comes.
π: 0 β©: 1
AnhedonicAuthor In reply to BatterymanAAA [2017-04-08 15:06:51 +0000 UTC]
I'd love to see the final product some day.Β
In regards to the wolf concept, flying-type would be perfect for several reasons, all of which I'm sure you're aware of: "huff, puff, blow" would entail flying type and flying is super effective to grass, but weak to rock, which lines up with the story of The Three Little Pigs. The wolf couldn't blow down the house of bricks and rock is super effective to flying. So everything falls into place really.
π: 0 β©: 1
KazeKira [2012-02-22 02:41:56 +0000 UTC]
I forsee Boarck as the final evolution, being a grass rock type. So far, good line.
π: 0 β©: 2
BatterymanAAA In reply to KazeKira [2012-02-22 02:54:35 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! And while Boarck isn't the name, it will be Rock-Grass.
π: 0 β©: 1
KazeKira In reply to BatterymanAAA [2012-02-22 03:05:58 +0000 UTC]
I figured as much. Now, what is its name?
π: 0 β©: 1
KazeKira In reply to KazeKira [2012-02-22 02:42:24 +0000 UTC]
Boarick, sorry.
π: 0 β©: 0
Peetzaahhh2010 [2012-02-22 00:26:06 +0000 UTC]
then it goes to Prick (pig + brick)
π: 0 β©: 1
BatterymanAAA In reply to Peetzaahhh2010 [2012-02-22 00:32:29 +0000 UTC]
Oh, no no no. I let Reshitank slip past me, but I wouldn't do something like that.
π: 0 β©: 1
Pokemonic [2012-02-22 00:08:51 +0000 UTC]
Cute final form. Three little pigs WERE all cute, you know.
π: 0 β©: 1
BatterymanAAA In reply to Pokemonic [2012-02-22 00:19:46 +0000 UTC]
Maybe. I'm taking input, as I currently have a hmeh design for the evo. I'll probably end up drawing a cute version, comapre them, maybe post them.
π: 0 β©: 0
RayquazaMaster [2012-02-21 23:46:43 +0000 UTC]
Cool! So all three pigs will be in the same evolution family?
π: 0 β©: 1
RayquazaMaster In reply to BatterymanAAA [2012-02-22 01:54:20 +0000 UTC]
Hm, maybe rough-and-tumble, but not really semi-ugly.
π: 0 β©: 1
BatterymanAAA In reply to RayquazaMaster [2012-02-22 02:53:20 +0000 UTC]
Semi-ugly is more my opinion on it. My opinion on my art differs heavily from those such as you, as I tend to hate just about everything in my gallery.
π: 0 β©: 1
RayquazaMaster In reply to BatterymanAAA [2012-02-22 03:08:52 +0000 UTC]
Oh. :'D Well, rough-and-tumble, then, but still try to make it somewhat cute!
π: 0 β©: 1
BatterymanAAA In reply to RayquazaMaster [2012-02-22 21:59:47 +0000 UTC]
Here's my plan: Post a deviation comparing two concept sketches. The one with the most justified support will have a higher likelihood of being made.
π: 0 β©: 0
tangocoyo [2012-02-21 23:37:21 +0000 UTC]
I love this concept. Next is the brick pig?
π: 0 β©: 1
BatterymanAAA In reply to tangocoyo [2012-02-21 23:55:01 +0000 UTC]
Absolutely! A Rock-Grass type!
Out of curiosity, would you prefer a Cute-ish Brick Pig or a Rough-and-Tumble, semi-ugly Brick Pig? I've had trouble with the design since the first cocnept and I have a tentative design at school.
π: 0 β©: 1
tangocoyo In reply to BatterymanAAA [2012-02-22 01:49:44 +0000 UTC]
rough and tumble. But make him look smart because he was the genius of the 3.
π: 0 β©: 1
BatterymanAAA In reply to tangocoyo [2012-02-22 02:54:05 +0000 UTC]
The way I'm going, smart may be hard to pull off. Does a confident smirk while gazing at the viewer sit well with you?
π: 0 β©: 1
TrueMefista [2012-02-21 23:35:02 +0000 UTC]
cute face)
π: 0 β©: 1