Comments: 43
SkullStringer [2010-03-02 14:40:03 +0000 UTC]
This has a decided anatomical feeling to me. It's cool.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
deepbluerenegade [2010-03-02 12:39:01 +0000 UTC]
what quality did you render this at?
I'm just curious if the grain was intentional
Molly : )
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bluesman219 In reply to deepbluerenegade [2010-03-03 01:53:45 +0000 UTC]
The quality was set at 2000.
Putting it on a white backround made the grainy look
stand out more. I rendered in both black and white backround.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
deepbluerenegade In reply to bluesman219 [2010-03-03 02:41:20 +0000 UTC]
It might be interesting to see if a quality of 4000-5000 would clean it up. Did you post-process render in apophysis?
Molly : )
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bluesman219 In reply to deepbluerenegade [2010-03-03 02:49:54 +0000 UTC]
With only 2 gigs of ram 4 to 5 thousand on quality would
be a very long render to be sure. But it's a good point.
I do post-process on some renders but not all.
I can tell you that with a black back round the graininess
disappears. I made a decision to use the white back round
just for a change.
An example of the black back round: [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
deepbluerenegade In reply to bluesman219 [2010-03-03 03:42:12 +0000 UTC]
I guess I am just addicted to post-process rendering : )
How long do your renders normally last?
I have 2 gigs too, but I am willing to wait 6 hours for a 10,000Q fractal (it's a nice surprise when I get back from work)
Size 2080x1300
Quality 10000
Oversample 6, Filter 0.04
1,490.92 Mb memory
start: 2:45:44 PM
finish 9:59:44 PM
Molly : )
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
frekie999 [2010-03-02 06:52:05 +0000 UTC]
nice work
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
gateman45 [2010-03-01 06:12:25 +0000 UTC]
great fractal!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
parrotdolphin [2010-03-01 05:38:41 +0000 UTC]
It's a beauty! I love how you get them looking 3D.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bluesman219 In reply to jim373 [2010-02-27 04:13:25 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Jim. I debated a white backround
but I think it worked out ok.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hubbabub [2010-02-26 11:13:35 +0000 UTC]
Lovely
👍: 0 ⏩: 1