HOME | DD

Brijeka — Ma 110

#apc #armour #army #gun #soldier #vehicle #war
Published: 2019-07-05 13:39:28 +0000 UTC; Views: 950; Favourites: 15; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Early Tempian/Tenari APC design. Access through hatches on either side of the hull. Armed with twin .30 cal machine guns in a small turret although initial designs simply had a machine gun mounted on a stand. These can of course be replaced with a grenade launcher or flamethrower (at the cost of replacing the dismounts with fuel tanks) or alternatively an ATGM (replacing the turret). Further, the entire passenger compartment may be replaced with a mortars or larger ATGM launchers, turning the APC into mobile artillery or a proper tank destroyer. Modernised variants feature a slightly larger turret and 20 mm auto cannon.

The Ma 110 has a crew of 2 and carries 11 passengers at a cross country top speed of 65 km/h allowing it to keep pace with 'modern' tanks (see: Vervix Ma11-06 MBT ). It also features NBCR protection for passengers and crew and is amphibious.

---

A much needed redo of the Ma110 APC  because let's face, the original is atrocious (I've come quite a way in drawing since October 2018). Now you have colour and no notebook lines! I also removed the bow machine gun because it felt kind of pointless, obsolete and I'm not sure how they would have replaced it with a 2 pounder anti tank gun (see the original)! Regardless, the original does give a passable idea of how the turret-less configuration looks.

Precursor to the Skral: 

Aside: Drawing all those circles frustrated me greatly. Why does not the compass point remain where it ought remain?!
Related content
Comments: 23

bogatyrkhan [2021-10-17 14:17:44 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Brijeka In reply to bogatyrkhan [2021-10-18 00:11:03 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

bogatyrkhan In reply to Brijeka [2021-10-19 15:09:51 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

678091 [2019-07-08 02:48:09 +0000 UTC]

In this case, I feel like the Predecessor was better

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Brijeka In reply to 678091 [2019-07-08 03:21:56 +0000 UTC]

Why?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

678091 In reply to Brijeka [2019-07-08 03:27:48 +0000 UTC]

Fire power and ballistics wise, 50 mm is better against light and medium armor and has better He warhead for infantry suppression and demolition roles, plus the frontal slope of the armor makes it hard for HEAT to penetrate

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Brijeka In reply to 678091 [2019-07-08 03:37:45 +0000 UTC]

I have not currently designed a predecessor to the Ma 110 APC but it certainly does not carry a 50 mm gun!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

678091 In reply to Brijeka [2019-07-08 03:39:40 +0000 UTC]

The one that you linked the Skyra

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Brijeka In reply to 678091 [2019-07-08 03:45:36 +0000 UTC]

The Skral came after the Ma 110.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

678091 In reply to Brijeka [2019-07-08 04:08:25 +0000 UTC]

Oh, sorry, my mistake then, but still the firepower is there, if it had a rocket launcher pod or an ATGM it could be a lot better than Ma 110

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Brijeka In reply to 678091 [2019-07-08 05:21:06 +0000 UTC]

Well no duh! That's like saying the M3 Bradley is better than the M113! The Skral is an arguably superior combat vehicle than the Ma 110 in every way, shape and form with the exception that the Ma 110 can carry a few more soldiers and if you read its (the Skral's) description properly, you would know that it can indeed carry four anti tank missiles.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

678091 In reply to Brijeka [2019-07-08 22:22:23 +0000 UTC]

well, cool

I got an idea, try making an upgraded Ma 110 with a 100mm or a 90mm, I'm sure it will look cool and have a lot of firepower

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EmperorMyric [2019-07-05 16:01:51 +0000 UTC]

I could definately see a Shturm like rotating ATGM rack and launcher on the top of that thing

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Brijeka In reply to EmperorMyric [2019-07-06 00:52:47 +0000 UTC]

The original launcher design was similar to that for malyutka missiles the Russians had on their BRDM-2s.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EmperorMyric In reply to Brijeka [2019-07-06 06:18:32 +0000 UTC]

Ahh so a bit earlier in time frame then, awesome! But with that sort of launcher it can easily be upgrade as time goes on to something like konkurs as well so great design

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Brijeka In reply to EmperorMyric [2019-07-06 06:42:12 +0000 UTC]

You could mount pretty much any launcher on it provided it was within the size and weight limitations.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EmperorMyric In reply to Brijeka [2019-07-06 06:44:48 +0000 UTC]

Should absolutely mount a davy crockett XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Brijeka In reply to EmperorMyric [2019-07-06 12:07:04 +0000 UTC]

That would be possible but the USA doesn't exist in the world of Tenar ! (they have their own atomic artillery however) 

As for irl Tempia , it doesn't have a tactical need for Davy Crocketts and its nuclear forces primarily consist of a small number of warheads mounted on medium to long range missiles to be launched from ships or submarines (i.e. a nuclear deterrent against certain threats).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EmperorMyric In reply to Brijeka [2019-07-06 15:22:25 +0000 UTC]

Thats fair atomic artillery is always fun, did they go full wacko like the US and USSR with producing nuclear landmines and such too?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Brijeka In reply to EmperorMyric [2019-07-07 10:46:44 +0000 UTC]

Tenar has the capability to produce such devices but it is highly unlikely it would use them in the defense of its lands except in an extremely desperate scorched earth policy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EmperorMyric In reply to Brijeka [2019-07-07 19:20:56 +0000 UTC]

Thats a good policy, What form of warfare do they specialise in if any? And do they use any kind of doctrine?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Brijeka In reply to EmperorMyric [2019-07-08 03:43:50 +0000 UTC]

Tenar follows its own military doctrine tailored for the defense of its lands and the projection of power across its region but I'm too stupid to currently explore it in great depth (people go to military colleges for that!)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EmperorMyric In reply to Brijeka [2019-07-08 08:44:30 +0000 UTC]

Good point, defense in depth may be one to take a look at in detail can help you design and decide some funky units and ways they interact with each other

👍: 0 ⏩: 0