Comments: 85
ParafaunaARPG [2019-02-18 21:48:53 +0000 UTC]
Some of your explanations are incorrect. Dun is in fact a dilution gene. It does not darken - it lightens. The 'markings' are remnant areas of undiluted color. And the whole thing about flaxen and silver is simply wrong. Flaxen only affects red pigment - that's why it doesn't show on black or bay. It has nothing at all to do with the fact that it's recessive or that chestnut is recessive. Zero. And in the same way, silver only affects black pigment, so it only affects horses showing black pigment. It's not "attached" to Extension as you describe. And badger face is not necessarily a sabino-only trait. It's seen in frame overos as well, and others with no Sabino1 alleles. For example: www.pinterest.com/pin/35402522…
This is otherwise a very good guide, so I would love to see it updated with accurate data.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BrindleTail In reply to ParafaunaARPG [2019-02-21 17:55:20 +0000 UTC]
While I definitely agree (as well as multiple comments before yours) that dun is wrong and I made this guide before I fully understood dilute genes, I'm curious on where you get your information on flaxen from? While the gene hasn't FULLY been mapped, there IS substantial research that flaxen is in fact a recessive gene. Yes it only effects red pigment just like silver only effects black pigment, but unlike silver, flaxen is assumed recessive because a flaxen x non flaxen chestnut will result in non flaxen chestnut, whereas two flaxen horses will always produce flaxen foals. And while I agree attached is not the best word to use for silver to black pigment, thats what i meant. Also it does not say that sabino is exclusive to badger face markings, just that sabino can/does cause them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ParafaunaARPG In reply to BrindleTail [2019-02-21 23:09:22 +0000 UTC]
I meant it hasn't been fully demonstrated. The breeding results are indeed quite suggestive, but it's not known for certain yet. It's possible there are more than one allele at the same locus, for example, and they are recessive codominant, with only subtle visual differences between them. Probably not, most likely, but you never know. My issue was more with the implication that because chestnut is recessive, flaxen is too. There's no connection between them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
not-cordial [2016-09-02 22:14:13 +0000 UTC]
Would you mind adding the paint pattern genes?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Leorarice [2016-08-02 19:39:26 +0000 UTC]
UM THANK YOU????? I NEVER UNDERSTOOD UNTIL NOW
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BrindleTail In reply to HazelTheUnicorn [2016-01-12 02:19:20 +0000 UTC]
I'm not sure where It says Ee equals bay? Could you point out where?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HazelTheUnicorn In reply to BrindleTail [2016-01-13 01:57:04 +0000 UTC]
Oh sorry! I made a mistake and misread it
I'm sorry and embarrassed!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Rikunni [2015-01-06 16:02:41 +0000 UTC]
What is the genotype of classic cream, I'm confused.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FallenArrows8 In reply to Rikunni [2019-04-15 16:08:51 +0000 UTC]
EE/aa/CHCH/CRCR is the geno <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kayosa [2014-10-01 15:52:20 +0000 UTC]
NOOOOO!
Dun doesn't Darken the points it Lightens the base. That's why its a dilution gene, and that's also why Bay Dun is often mistaken for Buckskin, because they look the same except with stripes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ninuturu [2014-04-18 15:49:55 +0000 UTC]
if i breed my Black splash (Blue Eyes) EE aa nSpl with my Chestnut, Flaxen carrier ee aa nf what kind of foals would i get? and how much change would i have to get something with black?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BrindleTail In reply to Ninuturu [2014-04-18 21:37:01 +0000 UTC]
All your foals would be black because of the EE so because you're mare is ee aa all foals would be Ee aa. Some might have nf and some might have splash, and some might have both. Hope that helped!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
teamush [2014-04-10 19:25:09 +0000 UTC]
Very helpful!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Peccantis [2014-02-25 23:06:23 +0000 UTC]
Just a tiny nitpick. At cannot show up on bay base because bay (A and A+) is dominant over it. Any horse with A_ or A+_ will be bay and cannot be seal brown.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BrindleTail In reply to Peccantis [2014-02-26 00:44:45 +0000 UTC]
There is further explanation in the artist’s comments section on the agouti gene, stating At may only be seen phenotypically if homozygous or paired with ‘a’. “Bay Based” on the sheet refers to the center column, meaning a horse that is neither black nor chestnut. Seal brown is also called seal bay and therefore I have put it within that column.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LumenWolf [2014-02-09 19:20:06 +0000 UTC]
This is very helpful!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kela-art In reply to EmmaVZ [2014-12-27 15:53:21 +0000 UTC]
that's why it says ee/_ _ ;3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kela-art In reply to EmmaVZ [2014-12-27 18:57:47 +0000 UTC]
that makes sense
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ObsidianFarm [2013-12-08 07:05:37 +0000 UTC]
Very clear for the basics of equine genetics...good job! Couldn't have explained it better myself xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
FateSpoiled [2013-11-20 07:29:47 +0000 UTC]
So would an ee ch be a gold?
Man I suck at anything like this... Really never understood Genetics!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BrindleTail In reply to FateSpoiled [2013-11-20 16:29:17 +0000 UTC]
It would!! Gold Champagne is ee __ (doesnt matter what the agouti is, but you could say aa to keep it simple) nCh or ChCh
if one nCh your horse could throw babies that are not champagne
if ChCh your horse will always throw champagne babies
ee aa nCh
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FateSpoiled In reply to BrindleTail [2013-11-20 17:37:24 +0000 UTC]
ohhh I think I get it now!
So an Ee Aa CrCr would be a dominant perlino and pass the gene to the offspring?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BrindleTail In reply to FateSpoiled [2013-11-20 18:12:15 +0000 UTC]
Just perlino! Or double cream. Nordanner has ruined the word dominant xD
But yes!! All the foals would have nCr from that parent.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FateSpoiled In reply to BrindleTail [2013-11-23 19:51:39 +0000 UTC]
Also, what would be the Geno's for Overo, Tobaino & Splash?
And would you mind checking my Geno's for my latest adoption (not uploaded yet) when I put it into st.ash?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BrindleTail In reply to FateSpoiled [2013-11-23 21:38:46 +0000 UTC]
Sure can!
The genes for Overo is nO or OO however OO is called lethal white syndrome and the foal will be stillborn
Tobiano is nT or TT though it has also been seen as nTb or TbTb
Splash is nSpl or SplSpl
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Prongy [2013-11-07 17:21:02 +0000 UTC]
No idea if you'll still change incorrect info. Paint is a breed and pinto is the group of white patterns. Duns always have leg barring, maybe really really faint on some to the point of being ridiculously hard to see, but it's there.
"Seal" isn't an addition to bay. It's a mutation of the bay (agouti) gene and is its own color. It doesn't only cause "seal brown", but also variations of brown (seal being the darkest shade) including what is called 'mock-bay' which can range from looking completely true bay with no mealing to changing colors and shades and intensity of mealing day-by-day. It is visible in homozygous (AtAt) OR heterozygous (Ata) forms.
My own horse is a mock-bay. Tested and true Ata (no generic bay 'A' gene, just brown 'At' and lack of agouti 'a'). He's my weirdo chameleon XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BrindleTail In reply to Prongy [2013-11-07 17:50:52 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for your input! As you can see I have not labeled the sheet as “paint genes” but rather, “paint patterns” as to describe the type of white found on paint horses. I also classify “to the point of being ridiculously hard to see” as phenotypically absent or “sometimes.” As my family is a breeder of dun horses, I can count plenty of times where no barring was to be found. I understand it was most likely there, but as a digital reference for an art website, I aimed for more options for the artist.
As for seal, I had added it upon request, as many deviants have the most trouble with At of the agouti variants, and also you can see that no where have I said that it is an addition, and have further explained the agouti gene in the artists comments. I have also said it is “mostly” seen as dark seal bay, not only. So your following information regarding the mutation is /missing/ information that whoever reads this is more than welcome to take into consideration upon reading the comments.
I realize that if I was going to explain one, I should have explained them all and had a row of At and A+ however that would also have required a Burnt buckskin, burnt perlino, sable champagne, sable cream champagne, wild bay, wild buckskin, wild perlino, wild amber champagne, wild amber cream champagne, and my goal for this sheet was to keep it as concise as possible.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Prongy In reply to BrindleTail [2013-11-07 17:56:31 +0000 UTC]
After over a decade of consistent and ongoing research on genetics...jesus my brain overflows a lot. It's a miracle I retain all of the information I have.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
xxElanite [2013-09-11 10:34:50 +0000 UTC]
the flaxen chestnut there is a liver flaxen chestnut :] a regular flaxen chestnut would be a normal reddish chestnut with creamy mane and tails.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DiamondHoofbeats [2013-08-18 18:46:35 +0000 UTC]
Cool! This is really helpful, but I still really dont get it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ninuturu [2013-08-14 14:12:06 +0000 UTC]
I'm getting a foal looking like this:
geno: ee aa nCr nD nCh nZ nP nTb nSb LpLp nSty (patn1patn2)
sooty pangare gold cream champagne dun tobiano sabino semi leopard appaloosa
OR
geno: ee aa nCr nD nP nSb nO LpLp nSty
sooty pangare dunalino sabino overo snowflake appaloosa
but i have no idea how to draw that... and i can't seem to find a 'pangare' collor
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BrindleTail In reply to Ninuturu [2013-08-21 04:05:31 +0000 UTC]
Well if you ever need help or want to trade nordanners for a easier color to recreate, let me know!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Lady-Wild [2013-08-01 22:47:19 +0000 UTC]
What would Amber cream Tabiano be?
What would Palomino roan be too?(im not good at genes)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BrindleTail In reply to Lady-Wild [2013-08-21 04:06:16 +0000 UTC]
Amber cream tobiano would look something like
Ee Aa nCr nCh nTb
Palomino roan would be
ee aa nCr nR
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>