Comments: 292
EhrenThibs [2014-10-09 01:44:49 +0000 UTC]
Outstanding!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
dorkiiexshorty [2014-01-29 07:01:39 +0000 UTC]
love the color choices and the contrast, so beautiful :0 great concept too!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fhelalr [2014-01-28 07:58:37 +0000 UTC]
Awesome <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
37CatCats [2014-01-24 22:23:03 +0000 UTC]
omg this is AMAZING
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Daws3 [2014-01-24 08:23:24 +0000 UTC]
Love this!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BrokenQuiet In reply to Daws3 [2014-01-24 11:53:50 +0000 UTC]
Thank you!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Leosceno [2014-01-23 17:22:42 +0000 UTC]
Isso é Lápis aquarelável (watercolor pencils)? qual é o papel?
Seus Trabalhos são lindos e muito particular. Virei fã! (quando eu crescer quero ser assim também) Um Beijo.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TurquoiseSubmarine [2014-01-21 12:28:15 +0000 UTC]
This is breathtakingly beautiful!! Love the ocean hairdo!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HalfofaHole [2014-01-19 01:22:54 +0000 UTC]
I really like the blending! What medium did you use?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
slowdog294 [2014-01-18 16:41:34 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful colour and detail. Excellent composition. Wonderful work. Annoying dA watermark. I do not use watermarks. I frame and sign my work. The frame and signature ARE the watermark.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
slowdog294 In reply to BrokenQuiet [2014-01-19 15:24:47 +0000 UTC]
You can actually watermark a picture without the watermark being visible. I see a ton of really nice artworks on dA from a lot of talented artists, but then, there is this huge watermark over the top. You can adjust the transparency of the dA watermark, as well as its size and repetition. It will be there, even when made invisible. The problem with an invisible watermark is that, in a standard JPG file, it cannot be separated for proof because JPGs have only one layer, unlike PNGs, GIFs or TIFs, which have many. Knowing this has caused me to go a different route and forego the watermark system which dA provides.
If somebody were to steal my art, what they are getting is a JPG that has been optimized for the 'net with an old program which does not support EXIF data. The tag is dropped during post edit. The file has had the addition of a buttonized frame which obscures the boundary of the image. Also, my name or the name of the one who took the image is at the bottom, obscuring pixels in that part of the image. The original file is on my machine. That one is unobscured around the boundaries and has the EXIF data intact. In a court of law, I am the winner. The problem then becomes the mountain of red tape you have to roll up in order to prove the art is actually the intellectual property of the one who made it.
The reason I bring this up is, I see a lot of watermarking here. I also read a lot of opinions on the subject. I understand the pros and cons of watermarking. What I have read is this: generally speaking, putting a large watermark in the center of an image puts people off. Yes, they will look at the art and even comment on it. But they will not fave it in many instances. Although some will ignore the watermark, most will not. The ones who do not ignore it and pass the art over because of it fall into two groups: folks trying to steal your art and folks who are purists. I fall into the second group. The first group makes watermarking a necessary evil, like ads on TV are a necessary evil there. Same stuff. Annoying.
All that said, and not just for you, but anyone reading this who has ever wondered about the pros and cons of watermarking, I look at your work in total awe. An extraordinary talent, you are, indeed. I can understand why you would want to protect the work you put so much into. I hate art thieves also. So far, I have not had to deal with them, since my work is of a different nature and I WANT folks to use it without restriction. You could say my stuff is open source.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ark4n [2013-05-03 12:12:05 +0000 UTC]
Great piece of art!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ark4n In reply to BrokenQuiet [2013-05-04 17:25:31 +0000 UTC]
You're welcome ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ioik [2013-04-29 20:01:03 +0000 UTC]
Some amazing skill here.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TomKilbane [2013-04-12 13:11:17 +0000 UTC]
awesome drawing....great line work too!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ozeichi [2013-04-07 03:23:42 +0000 UTC]
great idea surrounding the art ^_^
-- this is beautiful ~
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ozeichi In reply to BrokenQuiet [2013-05-05 03:11:23 +0000 UTC]
XD You're welcome anytime dear Haylea ! ~
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DanCrystalis [2013-03-26 13:08:38 +0000 UTC]
This is truly a beautiful piece full of creativity and imagination!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>