Comments: 39
motherearth01 [2013-04-24 18:45:17 +0000 UTC]
Fantastic shot!
π: 0 β©: 0
nilsjeppe [2013-04-24 07:54:59 +0000 UTC]
Very beautiful.
π: 0 β©: 0
ravenswolfe [2013-04-22 06:24:32 +0000 UTC]
Great shot, incredible location.
π: 0 β©: 0
Chucha616 [2013-04-22 00:58:12 +0000 UTC]
is amazing and beautiful o0, i love this swamp
π: 0 β©: 0
zevranarainai1 [2013-04-21 23:38:24 +0000 UTC]
Wow, if you use your imagination, the reflactions in the water do resemble that of the dead marshes
π: 0 β©: 0
KavotofFire [2013-04-21 22:59:45 +0000 UTC]
nice place for a permanent hide out from the toxins that is this society
π: 0 β©: 1
KavotofFire In reply to Burtn [2013-04-23 06:00:10 +0000 UTC]
Yes, I'm sure if I actually settled in there I would have solved the mosquitoes and snakes problem.
π: 0 β©: 0
SonofChinglu [2013-04-21 21:43:44 +0000 UTC]
Looks a lot like north Louisiana. You probably don't have to worry about alligators though.
π: 0 β©: 1
jLundhArt In reply to Burtn [2013-04-23 06:42:54 +0000 UTC]
Good thing it was only the boots though.
π: 0 β©: 0
Shiruy [2013-04-21 20:27:14 +0000 UTC]
Haha, I looked at this picture because I thought "Oh, wow, this looks just like the forests back home" and then I read the description and duh, it's because this is basically a picture of the forests I know from back home. XD I come from a place 200 km farther north, but the forests near the Czech border look just like this.
π: 0 β©: 1
plazadelpirul [2013-04-21 20:18:27 +0000 UTC]
excellent photo
π: 0 β©: 0
snarglefoop [2013-04-21 19:34:03 +0000 UTC]
This is a really lovely piece of work. (I spent a long time staring at the details before I could convince myself that no, indeed, it's not a photograph.)
π: 0 β©: 1
jLundhArt In reply to snarglefoop [2013-04-21 20:38:34 +0000 UTC]
But it IS a photograph.
π: 0 β©: 1
snarglefoop In reply to jLundhArt [2013-04-21 21:20:58 +0000 UTC]
Eh? But the reflection of the snag just to the upper right of the center of the picture is wrong -- there's an extra tree in the reflection. A lower eye point, such as one should have in the reflection, shouldn't do that -- there should just be blank sky behind the snag.
Anyway it's a lovely photo...
π: 0 β©: 1
jLundhArt In reply to snarglefoop [2013-04-21 22:19:06 +0000 UTC]
I've been trying too see what you're speaking of, but I can't.
But, you need to consider that this picture has been shot at a much wider focal angle, 18mm, than the human eye has, which is around 50mm. So what a normal person would see when walking through the same scene doesn't really apply.
And, yes. Yes it is a lovely photo.
π: 0 β©: 1
snarglefoop In reply to jLundhArt [2013-04-22 01:45:08 +0000 UTC]
I uploaded the detail I thought seemed wrong, with the tree and its reflection circled:
[link]
That doesn't look as clear as it seemed to me, so here it is again, but this time run through a bit of enhancement (retinex, unsharp mask, equalize, in small doses):
[link]
Given that it's a photo, this must just be one of those surprising cases where the angles don't produce the result one might have expected...
π: 0 β©: 2
jLundhArt In reply to snarglefoop [2013-04-23 06:44:01 +0000 UTC]
Tried to look at the pictures, but the site said that I didn't have access to them.
π: 0 β©: 1
snarglefoop In reply to jLundhArt [2013-04-23 19:29:34 +0000 UTC]
Ooops -- I messed that up.
I went back and set the images to share with anyone who has the link, so the links should work now.
Sorry about that!
π: 0 β©: 1
jLundhArt In reply to snarglefoop [2013-04-23 19:39:23 +0000 UTC]
Right, I see what you're getting at now.
That is a bit wierd.
π: 0 β©: 0
marrciano [2013-04-21 18:08:27 +0000 UTC]
Fine captured
π: 0 β©: 0
GWes [2013-04-21 16:52:38 +0000 UTC]
These sort of pines are one of my favorite types of tree.
π: 0 β©: 0
mantisazure [2013-04-21 16:05:25 +0000 UTC]
Your pictures never fail to capture the beauty of nature. Keep up the amazing work Burtn!
π: 0 β©: 0