HOME | DD
cookiesnap — Napoli
Published: 2010-04-06 14:26:15 +0000 UTC; Views: 2871; Favourites: 32; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Gulf of Naples (Golfo di Napoli)Related content
Comments: 6
This is much, much better. The sky looks far superior here than in the original. Great job.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, too bad it looks better on a mac! I've both and when i finished the work on aperture, it looked awesome. It has lost 50% of its beauty. (Much of it because of 8 bit...) but anyways, thanks for the critic. It really helped me.
(I like it more too... even if there are still a buch of mistakes, like the one you told me on the mountains.)
And...as you see i kept a bit of the "judgment day" mood it had on the other one. I can't help it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lol fair enough.
How do you mean it looks better on a Mac?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, you should know my computer set first.
I've a PC (Windows 7) and a PowerPC G5 with Mac OSX installed. I control them using a mouse and a keyboard (synergy, it's a program that allow you to do that over a lan network)
On the pc I use a samsung full HD monitor, while on the mac...you know how mac are made. Just the normal monitor all-in-one ahahah.
I use Aperture 2 on the mac (too bad i can't buy the version 3, 'cause is made only for intel architecture, while i still use an IBM)
Because of the dual monitor, i can compare images between the 2 O.S. and this is what i discovered:
The same file, with same format etc.etc. on the mac has more depth, definition, and color range. (Yes, 3 of them.) and it's visible, really visible.
When i noticed it i was like wtf.
The funny thing is that my mac has 6 years, and the monitor isn't HD. Even if is old it can beat an HD monitor and a last generation computer.
I still wonder why.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Strange. I use PC myself, I just get on with them much better than Macs. That is very odd though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0