Comments: 11
000-NoNameJames-000 [2018-11-17 04:40:14 +0000 UTC]
horrible, absolutely horrible. terrible. ugly.
learn how to use material design, and try again.
HOW CAN NO ONE USE MATERIAL DESIGN CORRECTLY???!!! THE WHOLE POINT OF IT, IS TO BE EASY AND FAST FOR DEVS TO USE!!!
i don't mean to be rude but, this is really bad, sssooorrrrrryyy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Cosmcala In reply to 000-NoNameJames-000 [2018-11-25 19:15:42 +0000 UTC]
I never said this was supposed to be Material at all, you just assumed that. All I did was swap the font to Product Sans, that doesn't mean I was even trying to make it Material. Heck it says literally in the description "This is not Material though so don't get mad about it not being a Material Design logo." I'm literally saying "THIS IS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE MATERIAL", it's literally just using Google's font, that doesn't mean it's Material.
And I mean, of course this isn't great. It's literally something I did for fun in a couple of minutes goofing around, if I was actually serious about making a good design, I would've spent way more time on it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
m-a-r-k-y [2015-09-26 22:53:52 +0000 UTC]
Not bad!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
m-a-r-k-y In reply to Cosmcala [2015-09-28 20:27:33 +0000 UTC]
Also, where did you get Product Sans?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
m-a-r-k-y In reply to Cosmcala [2015-10-01 00:16:59 +0000 UTC]
Cool! I thought it was just a font used by Google.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Cosmcala In reply to m-a-r-k-y [2015-10-01 09:31:49 +0000 UTC]
It is, but those people found out that Google was using their own web fonts service for their sites. It means the sites work better but it also means that anybody can use it and download it through Web Fonts which Google probably didn't want.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
m-a-r-k-y In reply to Cosmcala [2015-10-01 11:30:14 +0000 UTC]
OOOHHH... so its on the google fonts website. I dont really get it xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1