Comments: 42
trekkie69 [2010-03-27 18:05:00 +0000 UTC]
Simply brilliant!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PaladinArtea [2009-07-01 08:17:23 +0000 UTC]
I love this scene.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tangerinewarning [2008-10-22 15:48:24 +0000 UTC]
Amazing.
Do three nacelles give it a higher warp factor of something or just a more stable warp field?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
davemetlesits In reply to tangerinewarning [2008-10-22 17:39:20 +0000 UTC]
Thank you.
I do not really know. I only know that one-nacelled starships are called scouts, two-nacelled ones are called cruisers and three-nacelled ones are called dreadnoughts...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PaladinArtea In reply to davemetlesits [2009-07-01 08:17:09 +0000 UTC]
there was also the one-nacelled Destroyers, they looked identical to the Scouts, but were more heavily armed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
madmick2299 [2008-09-08 07:14:49 +0000 UTC]
awesome work ^_^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OatmealCookies [2008-09-01 03:13:34 +0000 UTC]
I usually think the Federation-class is an more of kitbash and a ship worthy of the starts,but this really brings out its best
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RBL-M1A2Tanker [2008-08-29 07:16:28 +0000 UTC]
However this Romulan is going to be hosed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BigMac1212 [2008-08-28 20:47:59 +0000 UTC]
What's the naval term for directly below a ship?
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
davemetlesits In reply to BigMac1212 [2008-08-29 16:54:32 +0000 UTC]
Hmmm... (checks Wikipedia and finds nothing)...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JamieTakahashi [2008-08-28 20:20:12 +0000 UTC]
Well, in every green nebula at least haha
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Spuderific [2008-08-28 19:51:54 +0000 UTC]
Whoa, never seen a Connie like that before
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
davemetlesits In reply to Spuderific [2008-08-28 20:02:31 +0000 UTC]
Cuz' it's a Federation class dreadnought, another member of the Connie family...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1