Comments: 31
Samboska [2017-02-09 19:32:22 +0000 UTC]
terrific!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wiwaldi24 [2016-12-12 20:19:30 +0000 UTC]
Great job!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ewelajnai [2016-09-04 10:04:11 +0000 UTC]
Przepiękne
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LilianWings [2016-09-01 12:57:28 +0000 UTC]
Very nice style!
I like the combination of colours and the many details in it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jdart2014 [2016-08-27 16:25:52 +0000 UTC]
Wonderful!!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kerabromsmu [2016-08-27 13:31:54 +0000 UTC]
Fascinating picture! Cannot understand what attracts me in this piece
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DeLumine In reply to kerabromsmu [2016-08-27 13:45:34 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for commenting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kerabromsmu In reply to DeLumine [2016-08-27 16:59:37 +0000 UTC]
You're welcome ;] The picture is really interesting
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
HaiaShouster [2016-08-27 07:09:33 +0000 UTC]
Nice and interesting work. !!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ClairObscur16 [2016-08-27 06:07:57 +0000 UTC]
What a many-faceted art! you have an oustanding talent, that I envy... I feel so trapped in my old vision!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DeLumine In reply to ClairObscur16 [2016-08-27 13:52:16 +0000 UTC]
You don't give yourself enough credit; your vision is neither 'old' or a trap, - you are an artist. Your vision is the filter of your own life and experiences at this present moment. As you have grown, your vision has evolved and matured to something beautiful, but you are still growing and your beauty will continue to unfold.
Thank you for the way you have interacted so sincerely with me and with so many others. You are obviously a very special person.
JDG
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
ClairObscur16 In reply to DeLumine [2016-08-29 15:18:20 +0000 UTC]
I'm as surprised as delighted to read such comment! I'm not sure I deserve it but I'm always sincere. Thank you, JDG, for so kind words!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
artin2007 In reply to DeLumine [2016-08-28 04:52:11 +0000 UTC]
I couldn't agree more.
Although I think both JDG and C-M
are each mature and effective in their respective
aesthetical visions. The representational
aesthetic, and its way of enhancing that
which we recognize so well -
even though we have not been in those places
chosen by the artist -by adding
palpable layers of emotion, is as artful
as "taking us where we have not been"(Kandinsky)
by another route, that represents by suggestion.
I believe that the semi-abstract is a
direct aesthetic descendant of Impressionism.
I love the idea of several of C-M's and JDG's
work both on my walls.
I wish I could achieve my belief
at some point that
I am an aesthetic heir of
Paul Delraux and JMW Turner...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ClairObscur16 In reply to artin2007 [2016-08-31 07:52:43 +0000 UTC]
Je n'aime pas beaucoup Kandinsky, mais je partage son avis: en exposant ma propre vision, J'essaie de permettre à l'observateur qui regarde ma toile de partager,
cette vision, de voir et apprécier les choses comme je les vois - probablement différemment de ce qu'elles sont.
Etre l' héritier de Delvaux me paraît ambitieux... de Turner, pire encore! Sorry for writing in french...It's easier!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
artin2007 In reply to ClairObscur16 [2016-08-31 16:48:57 +0000 UTC]
vous êtes si bon. Il est prétentieux de ma part
de demander soit Turner ou Delvaux!
Votre art est tout aussi fidèle à ce que vous voyez, tout comme l'art de Kandinsky - il a certainement Menat à peindre ce qu'il a vu, filtré à travers une lentille très différente de celle d'un représentationaliste ...
Je peux écrire en français, avec l'aide de M. Google,
et je peux reconnaître le sens ... mais absolument .... pas .... le ton
de l'écriture ... Dois-je écrire mon stiill trop prétentieux ou trop-ideosyncratic
Anglais? Ce qui est pire pour vous, mon français ou mon anglais? haha
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ClairObscur16 In reply to artin2007 [2016-09-01 16:38:07 +0000 UTC]
Sidney, I haven't written "pretentious", but "ambitious"! Do you see the difference? Let me tell you that I do prefer your art to Delvaux's , or even Turner's
one ! Did you notice rhat the BLUE is often ignored in the Turner's works? Not any blue forest...And I'm not esp.fond of Delvaux,eventhough they both are famous... . I like your style because it's so different, anti-classic, mysterious and...how to say? ..digitally irritating! OK? I like to torture the English language....
if you understand what I write....
But my not so bad English doesn't allow me to understand " ideosyncratic" ???
Please, stop jesting about our problems of language! I don't want you to get a headache, and I don't appreciate Google transl. wich is mediocre.
So, I prefer your "worse English", if not too..impenetrable. ( In french, .hermétique)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
artin2007 In reply to ClairObscur16 [2016-09-01 17:47:43 +0000 UTC]
ha... I understand.
I have also tried to use google translate for German.
My German correspondent also said that she prefers
my ENGLISH to Google's version of German!
Why is google translate so bad...?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0