HOME | DD
DenisGoncharov β
***
[NSFW]
Published: 2020-01-15 08:43:04 +0000 UTC; Views: 25531; Favourites: 821; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Related content
Comments: 65
π: 1 β©: 0
β₯οΈSaved for sketch referenceβ₯οΈ love how you've captured the light. The flow of her body is amazing.
π: 1 β©: 0
I've seen beautiful compositions, but this one is not only beautiful, but also SO calming, SO pleasing to the eye!!! I'm so happy it got featured, it is very well-deserved, awesome work, Denis!!! 
π: 1 β©: 0
Denis, your work is absolutely wonderful and I'm so disheartened at the negative comments this gorgeous and artistic photograph have received after I featured it as a DD. It's such a sensitive and romantically styled photograph, and the lighting is truly special and makes everything glow so softly! 
π: 1 β©: 0
π: 1 β©: 0
Must unfortunately agree with some of the comments below that the erotic aspects overshadow the artistic. The scene doesn't make much sense: It is not apparent what the character is doing - why the peculiar pose if the bow is already tied? - and the suspenders without stockings stand out as gratuitous. When the narrative makes no sense, it seems more voyeuristic, with the model as eye candy.
Nevertheless, the craftsmanship is nothing short of exquisite, and the model has a lot of poise. While the finer details may be criticised, nobody in their right mind can claim this is anything but an excellent shot.
Well done.
π: 0 β©: 1
This is quite possible the most backhanded compliment ever.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Call it crippling honesty. It is a beautiful shot and clearly technically accomplished, but understand where some of the ill impressions may come from, and would rather try to both analyze and praise than just the latter.
That said, I gravely regret the phrasing since in hindsight the mentioned criticism in previous comments turned out not as informed as I had hoped.
π: 0 β©: 1
I don't at all, this is a beautiful artistic nude there is nothing pornographic about it and in all honesty, you can post a picture of a naked buttock on the internet without a filter so it's ludicrous but to go out of your way to state that and then say well done is like a slap in the face.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
That I thoroughly looked at the details and attempted discerning the reasoning behind the composition and direction should speak for itself as assurance no offense was intended.
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
This is the kind of shit that gets kudos?
No wonder porn is running rampant.Β
π: 1 β©: 4
I encourage you to turn on your Mature content filter because this is very much an artistic nude and clearly, that is not your taste. We have a filter in place for you, please use it and don't harass the artists.
cc: Chinqwe Kacorkiraly Β
π: 0 β©: 1
1 lol
2 artistic nude, my ass. This is clearly erotica.
3 Unfortunately, when normal things like political stickers and dirty jokes are marked "mature" that isn't really an option, now is it?
And yet this, and *literal* porn are allowed to stay.Β
Have you seen all of the manner of filth? Like the one with the ground made of worms that are literally being used as dicks? (Pardon my french)
A sad state of affairs.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
What?
English, please.
π: 0 β©: 0
Um... No.
I do agree this is more erotic than artful, but this is original and high quality content well within established guidelines. Please do not make this false equivalence.
π: 0 β©: 1
Hard to deny what's right in front of your face.
π: 0 β©: 1
Okay, I'll phrase this as simply as I can: I'm not seeing silicone tits, I'm not seeing giant dicks, and most importantly I'm not seeing a watermark that says "BANGBROS" anywhere.
This is evidently not the same thing as what you usually see on the front page.
π: 0 β©: 1
By that same standard, playboy isn't porn, either.
π: 0 β©: 1
You're missing the point here. This is actually made by the uploader rather than just reposted from a porn site.
π: 0 β©: 1
It's still porn.
Who made it makes no difference.
Sofr amateur porn is still just porn.
π: 0 β©: 2
When the quarantine ends Β remind me to tell you that you need to go out more
π: 1 β©: 1
I can't deny that
π: 0 β©: 0
It is original content and within site guidelines.
If you don't want to see it you don't have to look, but please, don't conflate the work of a photographer who makes his own erotic photography with somebody who just uploads his porn folder to dA for kicks. That is just dumb.
π: 1 β©: 1
It's porn. Period.Β
And you practically just admitted it.
π: 0 β©: 1
How do I explain this in a way you can understand?
The thing that matters here is that it is not ripped from a porn site. Is that clear enough?
π: 0 β©: 1
Doesn't matter, it's still porn.
Where it's from is irrelevant.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
It is quite relevant since one is encouraged and requires effort and originality, while the other requires zero effort and takes credit for somebody else's work.
I'm just trying to understand how you are reasoning here. How is somebody taking the effort to learn photography, hire a model, set up a location, shoot, edit and upload their own erotica doing the same thing as somebody who just uploads something they got off a porn site? I don't understand the equivalence.
It would be a different matter if this was violating site policy (as copyrighted porn usually does), but it doesn't.
π: 0 β©: 1
It doesn't matter because who made it is irrelevant.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
So by this reasoning, if somebody uploads stolen art from somebody on dA and claims it as their own, the work by the original artist shouldn't be legit either?
π: 0 β©: 1
If it's porn it's porn.
That's all there is to it.
π: 0 β©: 1
Queen-Kitty , may I have your word on this?
I'm at my wits end trying to explain how a photographer on dA shooting erotica and uploading their own work is different from somebody uploading random hardcore ripped from some porn site. This really shouldn't be a difficult concept to convey.
π: 0 β©: 2
I really wouldn't consider this erotica at all...? I don't even think it's required to have a mature content filter on it. But yes, I am frustrated when people upload work that is not their own, which is why I am very appreciative that I get to highlight beautiful and original ART as DDs. With that being said, the above commenter obviously would not consider any work involving nudity to be art, and they don't seem to care either way if its stolen or original. I would suggest not engaging with them further as you will not convince them otherwise.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
My apologies for the unclarity: Meant the general subject, not this piece specifically.
Find it deeply frustrating as well. I'm not offended by the content as such, but find it deeply offensive when people just upload offsite porn folders into their galleries. It just feels like - if you pardon the dramatic tone - a betrayal of trust to what the community stands for, with the sheer disrespect for creativity and effort. And as seen above, it fuels the arguments of those who cannot or will not distinguish it from serious content.
Makes it a lot more difficult to have an open discussion than it should need to be. Remember being scared out of my mind when I uploaded my first artistic nude.
π: 0 β©: 0
I never said it was hardcore.
It's soft porn, and no amount of saying "BUT IT ISN'T FROM A PORN SITE!" Will change that.
π: 0 β©: 1
And again, the difference is one is made by the person who uploads it, and the other is just using dA as a backup porn folder.
π: 0 β©: 1
That makes no difference.
Who uploaded the porn is *IRRELEVANT*
The uploader made it, so what! It's still porn!
π: 0 β©: 1
I'm starting to wonder if this is less about the real problem of people stashing ripped porn on dA and more about a kneejerk aversion to nudity in general?
π: 0 β©: 1
I'm saying this is porn. That's all I'm saying.
π: 0 β©: 1
And I'm saying you are mistaken to conflate it with an unrelated problem.
I'm not trying to convince you this is something else, just saying the connection isn't there.
π: 0 β©: 1
It's porn, and thats all there is to it.
Anything else you wanted to discuss?
π: 0 β©: 1
I have been advised to leave you be, and I will take that advice.
π: 0 β©: 1
Lmao
Right o, have a pleasant day then.
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 3
Don't you think that was a bit less than called for?
This may be overly erotic, but it is also original quality content. Please don't equate this to reposts from porn sites with the watermarks left in. That is just insulting.
π: 0 β©: 0
So true. Good to see others are just as perplexed by this as I am
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>