Comments: 17
SameerPrehistorica [2012-10-02 09:00:52 +0000 UTC]
Already i had commented about it,now only i noted that.I mean, you mentioned as -- M. trogontherii heght 5-5,2 m is normal.Are you sure ? That is 16 feet. Sure it will be cool.But in most sites they use to mention as M. trogontherii is only 13 feet tall and once again the same 10 tonnes.That makes no sense to call this Mammoth as the largest since MColumbi and M Meridonalis also 13 feet and 10 tonnes.M. trogontherii would be 12 tonnes or more and averaged atleast 15 feet tall.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Cadrophemus In reply to SameerPrehistorica [2018-08-16 16:52:02 +0000 UTC]
That's something I don't get either. Why say that the Steppe Mammoth is the largest if it only equaled the Columbian and Southern Mammoths in size?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SameerPrehistorica [2012-09-12 19:42:54 +0000 UTC]
M. trogontherii has a average height of 4.5 m.I think no elephant known so far averages 5 m.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Amisgaudi [2011-07-14 21:26:15 +0000 UTC]
Nice!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
batworker [2010-12-30 12:36:31 +0000 UTC]
Ага, то есть все-таки версия на тему трогонотериевого слона. Но вообще, как я понимаю, представления о количестве видов ископаемых слонов расходятся меж специалистами в разы.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DiBgd In reply to mattwebb [2010-07-30 13:44:57 +0000 UTC]
I've made a preliminary sketch on another side of old papers (it was a works of my students), for economy - and next step is drawing in GIMP and Photoshop. Now, in summer I have some time to realise my old sketches - so, one o them was M. sungari!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
tassietyger [2010-07-27 18:00:31 +0000 UTC]
So is it one of these gigantic Eurasian mammoths or the indricothere the largest land synapsid of all time?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Daeodon In reply to tassietyger [2011-03-26 04:04:45 +0000 UTC]
It's fairly hard to say. Professor Claude Guérin has examined the bones of several indricotheres and deinotheres that indicate staggeringly massive animals. 30 and 25 tons respectively. Only Elephantidae has come close with several different species across genera reaching the 10 to 15 ton mark.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DiBgd In reply to tassietyger [2010-07-28 06:34:29 +0000 UTC]
I think, indricotheres was bigger, but mammoths was heavier.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SameerPrehistorica In reply to DiBgd [2012-10-02 09:00:29 +0000 UTC]
I would love to see a Huge elephant be found someday which will be as tall as the Indricotherium and weigh more.That will make an Elephant as the largest land mammal ever.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
povorot [2010-07-27 15:05:48 +0000 UTC]
I agree with patriatyrannus - the hair looks great.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
tuomaskoivurinne [2010-07-27 13:10:55 +0000 UTC]
I like the way you have done the hair. Instead of simply drawing short lines on top of each other, it really seems to "be there".
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
avancna [2010-07-27 12:45:16 +0000 UTC]
There's been so much wiki-drama on this critter's wikipedia entry.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DiBgd In reply to avancna [2010-07-27 14:24:50 +0000 UTC]
It's a real animal. I've seen it name between others components of fauna in English abstract of some Chinese article about Pleistocene climate. But it was, probably, not a separate species.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
avancna In reply to DiBgd [2010-07-27 16:02:18 +0000 UTC]
I don't doubt that it's real, but, I agree that it's probably just a desert-dwelling variant of M. trogonotheri.
It's just that one editor at Wikipedia is very defensive about that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0