Comments: 38
MejUGah [2011-06-26 07:43:36 +0000 UTC]
Don't worry! Be happy like us!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
psychoxdaddy [2011-05-22 09:08:11 +0000 UTC]
Great one!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dionisic In reply to Laura-Skeff [2010-11-27 08:13:28 +0000 UTC]
I understand you. These boys live in some parallel world.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
djailledie In reply to Dionisic [2010-06-03 20:03:22 +0000 UTC]
Wrong, wrong. Tomorrow you'll do better. Until you feel that you'll repeat yourself, which is what happens to me these days.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
djailledie In reply to Dionisic [2010-06-04 06:01:42 +0000 UTC]
I hope you are right, Denis!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dionisic In reply to djailledie [2010-06-04 07:20:49 +0000 UTC]
I am sure that I am. A lot of things are not up to you.
For example, I know for myself that when I find myself in the situations that really interested me, then I make good photos. Though, mostly I can not choose the places and circumstances in which I will be. These are mostly very boring situation, not inspirational. So is my soul mostly empty, and this is reflected in the photographs.
However, a completely new situation are also not very good: they fascinate me too much, and it interferes with my analytical mind. Therefore I need some time to stop to admire and to begin to rationalize thoughts. Arrangement of new impressions I could also consider as a kind of crisis.
You see, the human mind is very complex.
Therefore, I think you need a change not in photography but in circumstances. Look for new love (I do not think the girl, but in general, although the girl is one of the options), and thereby do not think about photography! Do not think about the audience, which looks at your photos, whether they like something yours! Think about how you will die some day, and what is it that you really love and hate.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
djailledie In reply to Dionisic [2010-06-07 04:15:03 +0000 UTC]
You attitude and reaction in front of new situations is interesting. Yes, thinking to it, I can relate to that. Too much excitement is not good, as it will make me forget some details.
Thinking to my future wouldn't work. I am a person worrying only about the present. I almost ignore the future. Carpe diem!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
djailledie [2010-05-12 04:26:45 +0000 UTC]
By the way, what do you use for that? A 28mm on a full frame, or a 20mm on an APS-C?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
djailledie In reply to Dionisic [2010-05-13 05:58:47 +0000 UTC]
I was just talking about the angle. This 14mm must be good because the distortion is not as big as what I get with my 10mm with an APS-C.
When so wide, the depth of field is quasi-infinite anyway.
From what I have seen, you have what matters, i.e. a subject and a sense of composition. And none of your images is screwed up because of a lack of technique. I am also very impressed with your black and white and your handling of large dark portions in the image.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
djailledie In reply to Dionisic [2010-05-14 05:22:47 +0000 UTC]
I was referring to image like your "Excavator", which is exposed just right, despite the very difficult light conditions. The cigarette and the face could easily be overexposed, and the bottom of the hole could turn dark. I am sure that it would take me three or four shots to get it right, which in these conditions is almost impossible.
With a 14mm, you will have to deal with the surroundings, DOF cannot help you and composition alone cannot always handle it. You will need to use another lens. Right now, I carry with me a 10-20 zoom and a 50mm, on an APS-C. I wish to try a 24-105, but I am not even sure that I would like to zoom like that. Too many parameters can get you worrying about things that are not as important as your subject - at least that's my take on it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dionisic In reply to djailledie [2010-05-14 07:41:37 +0000 UTC]
"Excavator" was photographed with 85mm lens. This confirm your thoughts about wide lenses. My 85mm is excellent, although I do not use it often.
Your conclusion is comforting for me. I have to hear and read, over and over (thousand times) about the objective problems of shooting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
djailledie In reply to Dionisic [2010-05-17 04:52:56 +0000 UTC]
14 sigma, 85 canon? 85 or 100 are excellent portrait lenses. Maybe a bit heavy if you have the fantastic 1.2
I personally didn't read much, played more trial and errors, shooting (hundreds of) thousands images, which is the beauty of digital photography. In 15 years of analog photography, I hadn't learned as much.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
djailledie In reply to Dionisic [2010-05-18 04:45:25 +0000 UTC]
I have slowed down significantly lately. First, I wish to keep my cameras a bit longer, secondly lack of time, and... I have learned a bit to judge before shooting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dionisic In reply to djailledie [2010-05-18 06:22:06 +0000 UTC]
I am also trying the same, but still there are many situations in which I just have to make that click to see later what will become from it. For me the simplest situations are the hardest, and with them I have to try and try always infinitely many times.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dionisic In reply to Miss-Tbones [2010-02-10 16:57:18 +0000 UTC]
Faces of the people in the town where I live are the only interesting thing. But, they often like to show themselves as they are not, and that is a difficulty for shooting.
When it comes to gypsies the problem is less distinct. They are more natural.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bindii [2010-02-09 20:37:50 +0000 UTC]
your shots are incredible, bravo!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dionisic In reply to bindii [2010-02-09 21:22:10 +0000 UTC]
It's so nice to read. Thank you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1