Comments: 19
Treysonk [2013-03-22 04:22:50 +0000 UTC]
I love this. So much motion
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SirLongSocks [2011-08-21 02:00:36 +0000 UTC]
Quite impressive!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Fairytwister [2011-01-18 01:24:08 +0000 UTC]
I"m not the best person to offer comment on this as I, too, have pretty static images. One thing that I'm puzzled about as I look at the image is whether the splash coming from bottom right is what is giving her hair momentum? If so, shouldn't some droplets extend past beyond her face?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Elle-H In reply to Fairytwister [2011-01-18 02:19:09 +0000 UTC]
Well, she's supposed to be flipping it actually. That's uh... been lost on many people who've seen it here at home, too. ;^^ Which of course means there's something wrong. Do you think more looseness in the face overall would help? The green is more of a symbolic thing. It's meant to give the impression of the music - sort of a bright, explosive, outward-pushing force.
Thanks so much for the comments, s-girl! In my opinion, everyone's impression is imporant whether they feel like they's mastered the techniques or not. For this type of image if the point/mood/action/whaterver is not apparent to the viewer, then I've failed on some level.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Fairytwister In reply to Elle-H [2011-01-18 02:25:57 +0000 UTC]
all this to say, thish is a great picture. I LOVE her face. Don't touch it... try the hair and see if it helps. Maybe even blur some of it at the ends so we see it in motion.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Fairytwister In reply to Elle-H [2011-01-18 02:48:08 +0000 UTC]
LOL. Not letting you change that now hahaha!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Elle-H In reply to Fairytwister [2011-01-18 02:50:50 +0000 UTC]
Ahaha, I honestly don't think I could anyway. I've already painted it twice now!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Fairytwister In reply to Elle-H [2011-01-18 02:50:18 +0000 UTC]
You know what helps a lot with those photos is that we also see more of the body sort of telling us what is going on. (There's a lean in those bodies and the arms also help sort of illustrate what the body is doing.)
That's another thought to try to play with there ...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Elle-H In reply to Fairytwister [2011-01-18 02:59:24 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, Paimonerra (up there ^ ) said a very similar thing. My first sketch included more of the body, as well as the arms, but I had major issues with foreshortening. So I didn't do it. Lazy!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Fairytwister In reply to Elle-H [2011-01-18 03:02:49 +0000 UTC]
Heh. All you need to do is put that word in the mouth of an instructor and then you know you'll sit down and try again!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Paimonerra [2010-10-10 16:59:04 +0000 UTC]
Gorgeous!
A lot of my stuff is really static, too, so I'm not the best person to offer critique? But I will, anyway? LOL! I think you did really well, here. Obviously the hair is the biggest indicator of dramatic movement, as well as the green, but it's still not quite there.
Her torso still feels so flat. I would actually suggest a more dynamic pose to easily achieve your movement - like maybe you draw her some arms and position them... ah... how to explain? Well I don't know. :'D Of course, that's adding something that wasn't even in your original picture, but that's often what you have to do.
A more simple thing to work with, I think, are her clothes. Or her jacket, more specifically. If the fabric moved dynamically, it would make this an entirely different picture. The flaps of the jacket could extend further to the left, like there's a strong wind blowing from the right side to left - since she's flipping her hair over her head. Her jacket looks thick, so if you made it a different fabric, there's a LOT more you could do with it in terms of movement.
IDK. I hope that helped.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LEKKER [2010-10-09 02:44:34 +0000 UTC]
cool. but there is a hard edge on the left, perhaps its from the texture layer. Turn down the monitor's brightness, may be you can see it tht way.
The flow of the pic is splendid leading by the splashes and hair threads.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1