Comments: 162
RA-5X [2015-06-01 09:20:08 +0000 UTC]
FINE LINES, SEXY AND WINSOME.
π: 0 β©: 0
aullus [2015-04-27 03:43:21 +0000 UTC]
Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β
π: 0 β©: 0
DannySamFanMan [2014-11-21 19:52:16 +0000 UTC]
Incredible pose!
π: 0 β©: 0
MEGAB00ST [2014-09-09 01:18:17 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
coyote334 [2014-08-17 16:00:26 +0000 UTC]
I love this picture and I love this bra!
π: 0 β©: 0
Hour27 [2014-08-11 08:57:00 +0000 UTC]
I wanna girl with a mind like a diamond, I wanna girl who knows what's best, I wanna girl with shoes that cut, and uh eyes that burn like CIGARETTES!!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
auxinix [2014-04-25 01:40:33 +0000 UTC]
soft, warm, smooth... and those damn eyes. every shot they are like burning into my soul
π: 0 β©: 0
waikar3d [2014-01-23 17:53:54 +0000 UTC]
gorgeous
π: 0 β©: 0
Caverndiver [2014-01-05 07:18:22 +0000 UTC]
I think this one may be my favorite of all your photos
π: 0 β©: 0
mybridalring [2013-12-28 13:02:41 +0000 UTC]
Merry Christmas!!
Now 2014 is coming. I have planning for enjoying at 31st December with Engagement to my friend.
Please give comments on enjoying 31st December 2013.
Mybridalring.com company is Los Angeles, California based provides Engagement Rings, Wedding Rings, Pendants and Earrings for fulfill all requirements on Christmas.
Merry Christmas to all my friends!!
Visit today at - www.mybridalring.com
MyBridalRing.com (Los Angeles, California Company β USA)
611 Wilshire Blvd. #1105,
Los Angeles CA 90017
Tell: (213) 290-9999
Fax: 213-624-2601
π: 0 β©: 0
fansjaguar [2013-11-19 15:41:54 +0000 UTC]
soo sexy
π: 0 β©: 0
NEUROPI [2013-11-03 00:08:39 +0000 UTC]
BELLASS
π: 0 β©: 0
freexray1 [2013-10-31 01:16:02 +0000 UTC]
What every man would say " Honey I'm Home " Yum
π: 0 β©: 0
nawabazone [2013-10-25 05:37:08 +0000 UTC]
wowieeeeeeeeeee!
π: 0 β©: 0
quandom2 [2013-10-21 15:52:58 +0000 UTC]
hump day, great caption
π: 0 β©: 0
teshayx3 [2013-10-18 20:51:06 +0000 UTC]
sexy
π: 0 β©: 0
MarkPersaud [2013-10-18 19:37:17 +0000 UTC]
Gorgeous!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
3rdMillhouse [2013-10-18 16:05:03 +0000 UTC]
My God, this woman is unbelievably beautiful. o.O
π: 0 β©: 0
cholo0107 [2013-10-18 15:14:48 +0000 UTC]
breathtaking!
π: 0 β©: 0
HxC93 [2013-10-18 05:51:29 +0000 UTC]
amazing woman
π: 0 β©: 0
Edu-Nizama [2013-10-18 05:10:42 +0000 UTC]
Muy buena... la foto.
π: 0 β©: 0
artmanbergen [2013-10-18 02:53:50 +0000 UTC]
nice image very pretty girl.
π: 0 β©: 0
iceman-05 [2013-10-18 02:33:14 +0000 UTC]
isn't she lovely when she stares you like this? BTW, great blurring effect, makes it a bit retro-style.
π: 0 β©: 0
magnanimousart11 [2013-10-18 01:18:55 +0000 UTC]
Best hump day ever!Β Thank you!!
π: 0 β©: 0
Hadalis [2013-10-18 00:23:20 +0000 UTC]
Ladies and gentlemen:
We have found her at last! Our new WONDER WOMAN!
π: 0 β©: 1
Galaxcai In reply to LifeSentence [2013-10-18 15:57:26 +0000 UTC]
She posed like it, because she wanted to? how would it be a shame?
π: 0 β©: 1
MsRiachuD In reply to Galaxcai [2013-10-22 16:53:45 +0000 UTC]
Self respect isn't the same to everyone.
π: 0 β©: 0
gregman104 [2013-10-17 23:30:31 +0000 UTC]
To anyone who calls this porn: You must be new to the internet. Porn requires nudity, (imo) though if something you see as a pass at seduction fits the bill for you personally then fine. This, however, does not need a mature filter because it has no nudity, underwear & bathing suits aren't pornographic, just clothing. Like some have already said, you'll find stuff like this in advertisements everywhere, and if it's OK for the strictly filtered advertising commissions then it's not porn. That's just my logical take, besides that great pic, pretty model, and hopefully she puts more energy in her other facial expressions - expression is what sets you out from the rest.
π: 0 β©: 1
ImpChan In reply to gregman104 [2013-10-18 00:55:56 +0000 UTC]
Porn is not defined by content but by intent. If the purpose of the image is to arouse sexually, it is pornographic in nature, regardless of the degree of nudity. Given the artist's comment in submitting the image, I would be inclined to believe that was the artistic intent here.
π: 0 β©: 1
gregman104 In reply to ImpChan [2013-10-18 12:38:52 +0000 UTC]
That may be, or it could just be a joke, (comment) since he can't be unaware people would see it that way, and besides that sex sells.
π: 0 β©: 1
ImpChan In reply to gregman104 [2013-10-18 23:32:06 +0000 UTC]
Personally, I'd classify it as softcore. I myself have no problem with pornography, and some of it is also artistic. However, this particular piece fails to say anything new or interesting, it has technical flaws, and the model's bra doesn't even remotely fit her. It is a static piece of eyecandy, as empty as the model's face. So while I've no problem with it being on the site, I certainly don't see why it needs to be featured here, or why we would pretend it is anything other than what it is: a pretty shot of a pretty woman, posted for no other reason than that she's pretty.
π: 0 β©: 1
gregman104 In reply to ImpChan [2013-10-19 00:14:49 +0000 UTC]
I have to agree with that assessment. (Don't mind the italics, I don't know how i triggered it, and Ctrl i didn'tΒ disengageΒ it.) Such is the internet that such things will always be popular for obvious reasons that I won't pretend I'm against. I'd like to think it unfortunate that DA is just another medium for the same old pics of girls that are everywhere else, but it is the internet as I said before, and I see no wrong with promoting one's work wherever possible. Also I wouldn't be quick toΒ dismissΒ this as not being art whether I think it typical/generic or not, because the photographer mayΒ genuinelyΒ think this artistic rather than just want the easy attention for his work.
The photographer is also still gaining with work like this either way since traffic determines popularity, so no matter what I see the sense of doing something so mainstream. I would just personally like to see more of an artistic take more often myself, (eg. Stefan Grosgean, I find his work to really show caring for the capture of his models more often than not, and their work together really shows a great deal of expression as well).
π: 0 β©: 0
WolfysKitty [2013-10-17 23:02:21 +0000 UTC]
happy hump day
π: 0 β©: 0
Spadassin1968 [2013-10-17 22:01:51 +0000 UTC]
You take a perfect picture of Julia , thank's .
π: 0 β©: 0
swizzy-boy90 [2013-10-17 21:41:35 +0000 UTC]
nice pic.... dam hot
π: 0 β©: 0
Naadziaa [2013-10-17 20:04:27 +0000 UTC]
She has a mismatched bra.
π: 0 β©: 1
korebetha In reply to Naadziaa [2013-10-17 20:23:16 +0000 UTC]
Sooo what.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>