Comments: 23
LovesSecret [2008-08-13 18:19:31 +0000 UTC]
Love the idea<3
π: 0 β©: 1
Amelie-Tagada [2008-08-13 14:15:20 +0000 UTC]
even that I don't like India, this one completely goes to my gallery, so beautiful, I adore collages like this!!!
You rule, girl!!~***
π: 0 β©: 1
Amelie-Tagada In reply to flowery-cookie [2008-08-13 21:21:47 +0000 UTC]
you are! but that's not wrong ^^
good luck on them and you are welcome!
π: 0 β©: 1
guillem In reply to flowery-cookie [2008-08-16 21:14:46 +0000 UTC]
It's quite difficult, impressive, and a bit "hypnotic" after a few dozen repetitions. I was just learning something about a dead tongue for scientific purposes, but using the ancient learning methods the classroom sounded (and looked) like some kind of cult celebration
Our teacher (who lived in India for two decades) told us that this "perfect pronunciation" thing had religious roots: according to some beliefs if you don't recite prayers perfectly, they don't work at all
And the devanagari script was adopted later for writing. The language has a LONG oral tradition before being formally written, so pronunciation was extremely important from the very beginning.
Yes, in fact after the basics we started learning yoga sutras. Most original texts about yoga were written in Sanskrit, or at least the best copies we currently have are in that language.
It was a summer course at UIB (Universitat de les Illes Balears, University of the Balearic Islands) and I took it just for fun because I'm a telecommunications engineer and a computer scientist, but almost everybody else came from yoga centers, not from the University itself. They wanted to understand better the phrases they repeat thousands of times every day
π: 0 β©: 1
guillem In reply to flowery-cookie [2008-08-20 20:27:06 +0000 UTC]
Sanskrit is surprisingly systematic, more than most modern languages. Of course it has exceptions, but in general a written symbol is always pronounced using the same sounds, and it has the same (or closely related) meaning as a root, prefix, suffix, etc. Even the grammar is systematic: there is a famous one written by Panini (circa IV-VI century BC) that's formed by 3959 short formal rules which allow you to write perfect Sanskrit without mistakes, just by blindly applying the rules.
So, for computers Sanskrit is much easier than most languages. In English you cannot be totally sure about the pronunciation of a word until you've heard it, and you must know the meaning or you have to look it up in a dictionary. In Sanskrit knowing the basics automatically enables you to do a LOT of things. I think that's mostly because most modern languages have an extremely complex history of wars, commerce, and other interactions and interferences from other languages. But Sanskrit was an almost dead language only written by a small powerful elite for many centuries, so it remained "pure", or at much closer to the original version than other languages.
The teaching system in India is quite strange too. Do you know how they do it? Well, they have western schools there (british, etc.) but I'm talking about the traditional way: until they're 10-12 years old, they just memorize books. Word by word, perfectly. Whole books, the real thing, complete. Literature, maths, grammar, everything. But they just memorize it, the teachers do NOT explain anything to the pupils. They just check that the children can recite the books by heart. Then, in a few years the teachers explain them everything: they explain them how to use the multiplication tables, the grammar rules, they learn the meaning of poetry... everything. And they don't need to look at the books because everything is already in their brains, just like prayers. It must be a huge shock to suddenly understand everything! A true illumination
π: 0 β©: 1
inkpot-lamp [2008-08-13 13:41:19 +0000 UTC]
Fantastic! Love this ;D
π: 0 β©: 1