Comments: 8
Psychedelic-Factory [2019-10-12 06:17:15 +0000 UTC]
Would love to divecwitjin and journet through those spheres and waves...amazing ♡
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kimiko140 [2018-05-31 15:30:26 +0000 UTC]
I get the feeling that you are experimenting with the fractals. Another interesting result. ^u^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kimiko140 In reply to FractalMonster [2018-06-01 03:53:42 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, well, even MORE experimenting, it almost felt like you weren't daring enough before. You had marvelous work before but astounding work now. Hmmm, I could probably use that video to learn how to make an actual fractal. I've been experimenting but my fractals either turn out "meh" or just... horrifyingly bad.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kimiko140 In reply to FractalMonster [2018-06-07 17:00:17 +0000 UTC]
What a coincidence. XD
Yes, with XaoS and Kalles Fraktaler, the programs you sent me, though-... I'm not particularly good with them, I do not yet know how to use them properly but someday soon hopefully I'll be able to master the system of Xaos and Kalles Fraktaler. Or I could just google a tutorial on how to use them, that would be easier.
No, actually I haven't seen those before. O__O I didn't say you weren't daring, but during a period of time it seemed like many of the motives in your pictures were the same (I remember a period where you had the same size of the Mandelbrot in the center of the image but with different colors around it each time, either my memory is failing me there or I just mistook you for someone else. :/ It felt like you or whatever artist was the rightful owner of those pictures didn't want to move out of your comfort zone. At times it wasn't the Mandelbrot but the motive was in the center every time and I thought: "Hm, maybe I can contact them and encourage them to move out of their comfort zone?")
I went to check your gallery because I might have mistaken you for someone else-... and I HAD mistaken you for someone else... o___o ... Goodness gracious this is embarrassing... I loosely remember I looked at a gallery of someone that used the Mandelbrot and always placed the figure, not filled in, in the center of the image, with no interesting details, and almost every other piece was just in another color.
Well, shit, you can forget every single comment of criticism I ever gave you because your art is amazing and you were not who I thought you were. Dear me how embarrassing...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FractalMonster In reply to Kimiko140 [2018-06-07 22:50:58 +0000 UTC]
Yeah
I suspected that. Regarding Xaos, just go through the "GetStarted" journal, plus the Help Desk. For zooming in, point to the spot and press the left mouse button, zooming out the right one. In Kalles Fraktaler you use the mouse wheel to zoom with. It's a very fast software allowing you to zoom without limit. I have 2 sections in my gallery with deep zoom produced with KF.
Now we arrived a little bit to centered mandala-like fractals contra asymmetric fractals. Some people love one of those, but not the other, and I produce both types I agree the the last period of time I have been devoted to most centered fractals. A copy of the Mandelbrot in the center is SO classic in this genre. Note: all motives with a copy of the Mandelbrot set (in a center or not), do NOT come from the ordinary Mandelbrot set since copies of the M set also occur in many other "Mandel types" of fractals. This universalism is SO interesting, especially from a theoretical point of view. Those fractals are empirical results of computer simulations, and the fact that copies of the M set also occurs in other fractals chocked the mathematicians a bit. It took a while for them to prove mathematically, using traditionally mathematical methods as theorems and evidences, that this was the case. Anyhow in my recent motives you discuss is always a copy of the M set in the center, however invisible at the scale level of those images
Don't sweat, you are the very first at my soon twelve years on dA that has discussed my fractals from aesthetic point of view in that very deep way. What you have to learn is that fractals are the meeting point of aesthetics and hardcore laws of math. That's a fact which have shocked many people. It goes straight into the discussion of freedom contra determinism
👍: 0 ⏩: 0