HOME | DD

FractalMonster — Sunny Waves around the Fruits of the Ocean by-nc-sa

#quartic #parameterspace
Published: 2018-05-26 20:31:51 +0000 UTC; Views: 387; Favourites: 36; Downloads: 5
Redirect to original
Description Also at the branch leading up to the earlier deviation .
 
Quartic Parameter Space. See my journal Quartics Revisited.
 
Ultra Fractal6
 
Below the parameter file. Play and have fun
 
 
SunnyWavesAroundTheFruitsOfTheOcean {
fractal:
  title="Sunny Waves around the Fruits of the Ocean" width=800
  height=600 layers=1 credits="Ingvar Kullberg;5/25/2018"
layer:
  caption="QCL" opacity=100 method=multipass
mapping:
  center=-0.448182343901885/0.310857420660405 magn=23273.312
formula:
  maxiter=10000 filename="sp3.ufm" entry="QuarticParameterspace3"
  p_PlottedPlane="1.(a-real,a-imag)" p_M=QCL p_SetBorders=no
  p_hide=yes p_areal=0.0 p_aimag=0.0 p_breal=0.0 p_bimag=0.5
  p_creal=0.0 p_cimag=0.0 p_xrot=0.0 p_yrot=0.0 p_xrott=0.0
  p_yrott=0.0 p_xrotu=0.0 p_yrotu=0.0 p_xrotv=0.0 p_yrotv=0.0
  p_zrot=0.0 p_LocalRot=no p_diff=no p_bailout=100.0 p_dbailout=1E-6
inside:
  transfer=none
outside:
  density=4 transfer=linear filename="spr.ucl"
  entry="ContinousPotential" p_auto=yes p_auton=2.0 p_n=5.0
  p_numfact=5.0 p_scale=1.0 p_smooth=no p_epsilon=0.5 p_illustr=no
  p_limiton=no p_limit=0.1 p_index3=0.0 p_index1=0.99 p_index2=0.0
  p_speed=0.5 p_acc=1.0 p_clog=yes p_power=4.0 p_reversed=no p_test=no
  p_testvalue=0.7 p_index4=0.29
gradient:
  smooth=yes rotation=-123 index=64 color=13331226 index=201
  color=16711663 index=226 color=38143 index=236 color=3473428
  index=-161 color=11665408
opacity:
  smooth=no index=0 opacity=255
}
Related content
Comments: 8

Psychedelic-Factory [2019-10-12 06:17:15 +0000 UTC]

Would love to divecwitjin and journet through those spheres and waves...amazing ♡

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to Psychedelic-Factory [2019-10-12 15:17:13 +0000 UTC]

.. at you own risk

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kimiko140 [2018-05-31 15:30:26 +0000 UTC]

I get the feeling that you are experimenting with the fractals. Another interesting result. ^u^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to Kimiko140 [2018-05-31 18:04:54 +0000 UTC]

Almost ALL my fractals are the results of experimenting. Or rather exploring as the patterns are already there waiting for being discovered. The fractal art in itself is a side effect computer simulations of of the dynamic behavior of mathematical functions under iterations, which is close to the new science of Chaos rising during the eighties. One of the eye openers were the book The Beauty of Fractals written by the mathematicians Peitgen and Richter. That book is decorated by a lot of color plates which gave rise to big attention far beyond the world of mathematicians. In this journal I have linked to a video produced 1990. What you see there is one hundred percent of experimenting

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kimiko140 In reply to FractalMonster [2018-06-01 03:53:42 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, well, even MORE experimenting, it almost felt like you weren't daring enough before. You had marvelous work before but astounding work now. Hmmm, I could probably use that video to learn how to make an actual fractal. I've been experimenting but my fractals either turn out "meh" or just... horrifyingly bad.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to Kimiko140 [2018-06-01 10:17:36 +0000 UTC]

That video maybe is not that good as a manual for a fractal software. The funny thing is that his desktop computer was the very same model (mac llcx) as my first computer


You try fractaling yourself What software did you use? maybe you red this journal?


"Daring that before"! Have you seen the below images,


fractalmonster.deviantart.com/…
fractalmonster.deviantart.com/…
fractalmonster.deviantart.com/…


Probably not beautiful, but "VERY interesting from a theoretical point of view You see I am very brave, at least when it comes to fractals

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kimiko140 In reply to FractalMonster [2018-06-07 17:00:17 +0000 UTC]

What a coincidence. XD

Yes, with XaoS and Kalles Fraktaler, the programs you sent me, though-... I'm not particularly good with them, I do not yet know how to use them properly but someday soon hopefully I'll be able to master the system of Xaos and Kalles Fraktaler. Or I could just google a tutorial on how to use them, that would be easier.

No, actually I haven't seen those before. O__O I didn't say you weren't daring, but during a period of time it seemed like many of the motives in your pictures were the same (I remember a period where you had the same size of the Mandelbrot in the center of the image but with different colors around it each time, either my memory is failing me there or I just mistook you for someone else. :/ It felt like you or whatever artist was the rightful owner of those pictures didn't want to move out of your comfort zone. At times it wasn't the Mandelbrot but the motive was in the center every time and I thought: "Hm, maybe I can contact them and encourage them to move out of their comfort zone?")

I went to check your gallery because I might have mistaken you for someone else-... and I HAD mistaken you for someone else... o___o ... Goodness gracious this is embarrassing... I loosely remember I looked at a gallery of someone that used the Mandelbrot and always placed the figure, not filled in, in the center of the image, with no interesting details, and almost every other piece was just in another color.

Well, shit, you can forget every single comment of criticism I ever gave you because your art is amazing and you were not who I thought you were. Dear me how embarrassing...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to Kimiko140 [2018-06-07 22:50:58 +0000 UTC]

Yeah


I suspected that. Regarding Xaos, just go through the "GetStarted" journal, plus the Help Desk. For zooming in, point to the spot and press the left mouse button, zooming out the right one. In Kalles Fraktaler you use the mouse wheel to zoom with. It's a very fast software allowing you to zoom without limit. I have 2 sections in my gallery with deep zoom produced with KF.


Now we arrived a little bit to centered mandala-like fractals contra asymmetric fractals. Some people love one of those, but not the other, and I produce both types I agree the the last period of time I have been devoted to most centered fractals. A copy of the Mandelbrot in the center is SO classic in this genre. Note: all motives with a copy of the Mandelbrot set (in a center or not), do NOT come from the ordinary Mandelbrot set since copies of the M set also occur in many other "Mandel types" of fractals. This universalism is SO interesting, especially from a theoretical point of view. Those fractals are empirical results of computer simulations, and the fact that copies of the M set also occurs in other fractals chocked the mathematicians a bit. It took a while for them to prove mathematically, using traditionally mathematical methods as theorems and evidences, that this was the case. Anyhow in my recent motives you discuss is always a copy of the M set in the center, however invisible at the scale level of those images


Don't sweat, you are the very first at my soon twelve years on dA that has discussed my fractals from aesthetic point of view in that very deep way. What you have to learn is that fractals are the meeting point of aesthetics and hardcore laws of math. That's a fact which have shocked many people. It goes straight into the discussion of freedom contra determinism

👍: 0 ⏩: 0