HOME | DD
GamesProduction β If FNaF 1 had a Extras - Freddy Fazbear
#3dsmax #extras #freddy #gp #fnaf #freddyfazbear #fnaf1 #fnafextras #ucncollection
Published: 2018-07-12 05:16:25 +0000 UTC; Views: 13547; Favourites: 220; Downloads: 92
Redirect to original
Related content
Comments: 65
Kid, I said get away from my stage your breath stinks *to self:fuckin toddlersΒ
π: 0 β©: 1
this is a perfect description of that face & pose
π: 0 β©: 0
You can tell he's going to fuck up your game soon
π: 0 β©: 0
Ik that look, he doesn't like his nose touched
π: 0 β©: 0
it looks like he's doing standup and someone is trying to heckle him and he's putting the heckler in their place
π: 0 β©: 0
this looks so accurate, good job!
but this pose is a little odd
π: 0 β©: 0
It genuinely looks like it belongs in the game.
π: 0 β©: 0
i dont really like to see his eyebrows moved
it looks really weird
π: 0 β©: 1
thats what i wanted to say, i didnt want you to take it like its your fault
π: 0 β©: 0
Correction: "If FNaF 1 had an 'Extras' menu"
π: 0 β©: 0
Scott, how many times do we need to teach you a lesson, old man? Don't use alts.
π: 0 β©: 0
Holy shoot, that lighting and posing makes the "If FNaF 1 had Extras" thingy so Scott looking, I would have loved as well seeing FNaF 1 crew on an Extras menu ngl 
π: 0 β©: 0
it looks pretty accurate, im just not a huge fan of his left arm its posed kinda weird.
π: 0 β©: 0
Looks like a real render! I'm not so sure but, is each FNAF 1 Freddy different in some renders? The FNAF 1 game renders look different from the renders we have now.
π: 0 β©: 1
No, it's just the ligthing.
π: 0 β©: 2
Yes, they're different.
π: 0 β©: 1
No, Scott just changed the lighting, he used a kinda yellowish light, but the textures aren't different.
π: 0 β©: 1
No.
He changed the teeth texture, and painted the inner jaw black.
And most likely fixed a few texture issues.
π: 0 β©: 1
No, that's because of the ligthing. And the inner jaw isn't black, and the textures aren't different. The teeths are maybe more detailed because the render is higher quality
π: 0 β©: 1
So, you're telling me that, everyone that have more experience than you and me, and that actually payed attention to the model, were wrong?
π: 0 β©: 1
No, it's just that they used the new lighting that scott used, otherwise normally they would have used the old ligthing.
π: 0 β©: 1
ok, how do you explain that then?
gyazo.com/575bce3d9bde1bce3523β¦Β
gyazo.com/4681d61a1502a270868aβ¦Β
gyazo.com/d607aba3e62572363e09β¦Β
The jaw has that black spot
π: 0 β©: 1
I might not be a Freddy expert, as said, but I know modelling, and this isn't a shadowΒ
gyazo.com/39df17e598434a9f53ffβ¦
It's pretty obvious tbh.
You can see that Scott painted the polygons.
π: 0 β©: 1
prntscr.com/k6sd04
There's a part there that's not black, and Scott's polygons aren't that small, so It's definetly shadows.
π: 0 β©: 1
Whatever then. Since you won't accept all the proof that I've shown you, I give up.
π: 0 β©: 1
You are wrong on so many levels. There is no way to achieve that kinda shadow unless the light was high above Freddy. (Even then it wouldn't have the black in front of the teeth) Thats why Rynfox's model has a bodygroup for it. I've recreated the fright dome and pissed Freddy images multiple times to know this. With the lighting Scott is using they aren't shadows. Rather a black texture that Scott plopped down under the teeth.Β
gyazo.com/575bce3d9bde1bce3523β¦
Yes, there is that part beside the endo jaw. Thats just how far the black spot goes. Also if you still don't believe me. There is your supposed "shadow" infront of the teeth. Which wouldn't be possible. gyazo.com/d9b4aae7756a86bd127c⦠Look I put a light above Freddy and there is no "shadow" in front of the teeth. But if you turn on the black texture. gyazo.com/6bad6cbc8b177b1d8241⦠It is now there. It's a texture.
π: 0 β©: 1
Okay, my bad. But the freddy fur is still the same, just another ligthing. Only the black texture on the jaw is something different.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yes, Freddy's fur is still the same.
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>