Comments: 19
gbindis In reply to lenindcruz [2012-07-02 14:38:04 +0000 UTC]
They were merged and scaled, that's probably the reason. But yes, in a full view they are a bit too sharp.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MartinSilvertant [2012-06-28 04:06:47 +0000 UTC]
I'm not sure which symbol I like most but they're all pretty sweet. What I find particularly striking though is the typeface; it looks so nice and sharp. With the softer color tone it gives the logo a fresh and modern look.
Is this the website of the agency you did this logo for? If so they made a terrible choice. If not, I'm very curious what the winning design was because your work is striking.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MartinSilvertant In reply to gbindis [2012-06-29 11:37:04 +0000 UTC]
It's quite ironic to me how a website for crowd sourcing logos and such doesn't know what's good for their own brand. This Mintia branding [the one they chose] is almost as neutral as possible, which is no good for a brand.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
gbindis In reply to MartinSilvertant [2012-07-02 14:41:09 +0000 UTC]
I thought the same thing after I saw the results. There were a few better projects, but you know - it's still their choice.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
gbindis In reply to damsonweb [2012-06-21 14:29:55 +0000 UTC]
To 'M' stylizowane na dwa listki (mięty). W kilku wariacjach.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MET4LCR0W [2012-06-21 14:10:21 +0000 UTC]
Very good job. I like the first one!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1