HOME | DD

MiyamotoArt In reply to TheStrangerous [2024-09-24 15:14:19 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ISeeTheLattice In reply to TheJourneyTaker [2015-01-07 08:01:06 +0000 UTC]

I think if you knew an angstroms worth more about Tarantino films moreso than what you gathered from The Blaze or InfoWars that he neither negates the inherent depravity nor romanticizes the supposed infallibility or morality of any race or creed

And if you watched it for more than the 5-second sound bytes that suit your preconceptions on what the film actually conveys (here's a hint, much ado about nhillisitic nothing), you'd clearly observe that Tarantino gives no quarter to any character, and how suitingly so since all human beings are fallible and prone to commit acts of abscondant evil as much as they have the potential to do good.

This is coming from someone who is about as white "aryan" in appearance as you can fathom, and I shall have you know that I am not so foolish as to ascribe absolute authority towards any political viewpoint, much as by the same token it is by capitalism through which I thrive and my ideas may prosper.

The world isn't black and white, sorry if you think so.

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

TheJourneyTaker In reply to ISeeTheLattice [2015-01-07 14:21:19 +0000 UTC]

The movie is about blacks getting revenge on whites. I don't need you telling me what you think it's about. I already know.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ISeeTheLattice In reply to TheJourneyTaker [2015-01-07 16:56:26 +0000 UTC]

Contextually wrong once again.

No, it's about a slave becoming free with the help of a German bounty hunter, whom together become badasses who kill wanted criminals for money with the eventual goal of using such funds to free his enslaved wife who was sold to a seperate owner, underwhom some Uncle Tom dipshit (played quite well by Samuel Jackson) makes life miserable for his fellow blacks and in the end gets his justice also. 
Within the extremely narrow context of the protagonists personal concerns and motivation, the film in question doesn't waste any of its time in storytelling to either endorse or to disparage the institution of slavery in the antebellum period.

I honestly don't believe without a shadow of a doubt that you have ever bothered to watch the film before making a judgement, but of course if all you want to see in the world is whatever negativity validates your view of everyone else who you may or may not feel is below you, who am I to judge? Because in the end your personal opinion does not define the intended narrative of a film which had zero imput upon your part,
and of which in trademark Tarantino style does not implicate nor suggest anything on political or philosophical grounds.

Next time you read into a book or watch a film, quit just skimming the preface and actually read or watch it. You'll come across as a lot less ignorant by then and perhaps a decent and human being too. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheJourneyTaker In reply to ISeeTheLattice [2015-01-07 17:19:18 +0000 UTC]

Wonder what would happen if someone made a movie that was derogatory to blacks... I wonder...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ISeeTheLattice In reply to TheJourneyTaker [2015-01-07 17:44:40 +0000 UTC]

Gee, and I wonder if you had the balls to follow through with any other sort of stereotypical hypothetical you could postulate... but probably not. 

Its like saying that a film about the holocaust (however debatable the scale of slaughter truly is which I will not touch upon here) is about Jews killing off Germans... but oh yes the silver lining is "culturally" right? And as an ethnic german I know as much as many that Hitler absolutely DESTROYED German culture and sacrificed it before the alter of Fascist Statism and petty Occult aesthetics.

We do not ascribe the morally subjective determination of innocence or guilt in our court system,
and for those who know better and can read into the lines and see beyond absolutes, unlike 12 years a Slave director "Steve McQueen", Quentin Tarantino assigns zero judgement of either complacency or guilt upon all whites simply because there are white slavers in the south as depicted in the film who by nature of their industry; bear slaves... a universally abhorent practice by all.

But again, you do not require convincing. Intellectual dishonesty in your arguements is the measure of the character I can make through dissecting what you say to the letter.
How quaint it must be that unlike on your own personal page, you cannot simply erase an articulate viewpoint that contrasts with your own.

Put up or shut up, for that is the true essence of Socratic debate in a democracy!

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

TheWunderbarMaster In reply to ISeeTheLattice [2015-05-22 03:14:56 +0000 UTC]

This is great xD.

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

ISeeTheLattice In reply to TheWunderbarMaster [2015-05-22 03:31:41 +0000 UTC]

I am a dolphin wearing a top hat! *D

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

harijz In reply to 0618623 [2013-02-20 09:27:31 +0000 UTC]

f***ing tnx

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

djodj In reply to dersebbe [2015-05-16 09:31:49 +0000 UTC]

Interested by the answer if there ever was one

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

harijz In reply to byrtbyrt [2013-01-30 18:55:25 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

harijz In reply to NEU-7 [2013-01-20 20:51:12 +0000 UTC]

Of course dude!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0