Comments: 21
Attyyay [2015-01-22 17:26:25 +0000 UTC]
The hands, the feet, the femur, the shadow on the face, the black, the blue...I adore everything you do.
π: 0 β©: 0
NicksPatties [2014-09-20 00:30:06 +0000 UTC]
As usual, your work intrigues and delights me. Looking forward to the rest of the alphabet.
π: 0 β©: 0
krisztianhallai [2014-09-14 13:32:33 +0000 UTC]
Tattered puppet, molested muffet,
sedated cricket, exploited picket,
this is your stage, this is where you perform,
this is the place when your great inner self surfaces,
the fields of everlasting evergreens,
sprayed over with highly grinded spleens.
Wonderful piece, keep up with the good things.
π: 0 β©: 0
robwahl [2014-09-12 10:04:47 +0000 UTC]
Fantastic work!
π: 0 β©: 0
kaygirl101 [2014-09-11 21:22:48 +0000 UTC]
Mature tag, please.
π: 0 β©: 1
SamSquared In reply to kaygirl101 [2014-09-12 14:58:29 +0000 UTC]
Do you honestly have nothing better to do with your time? Whilst the picture does show nudity, the depiction of the human form here and in many of hypnothalamus' pieces plays with anatomy and symbolism rather than being presented in such a way as to be sexually provocative. Must you be so litigious? As DA increasingly fills up with cheap erotica and the like it is sad that you have chosen to take a stance against what I'm sure many people here would agree is one of the sites most inspiring artists.
π: 0 β©: 1
kaygirl101 In reply to SamSquared [2014-09-12 16:10:46 +0000 UTC]
I agree it's a nice picture. Not one I'm personally interested in, but the anatomy is very nice. I'm not suggesting it needs to be censored or removed. I just felt it was more mature and should be marked as such. if the DA admins see it as good to go, I'm not going to argue.
π: 0 β©: 1
QuantumCrab In reply to kaygirl101 [2014-09-22 02:56:14 +0000 UTC]
Honestly, at this point you're just trolling him. Please stop. Any exposed anatomy in his pieces is not erotic, whatsoever.
π: 0 β©: 1
kaygirl101 In reply to QuantumCrab [2014-09-22 13:21:45 +0000 UTC]
If he has to keep responding, I have all the right to respond back. To say I'm "trolling" is a complete misuse of the word. I'm not trying to anger for my own amusement. I was trying to explain my side and my thoughts. It is not my fault if someone disagrees or to why extent. I made a simple request to the poster, nothing no one else should have payed attention to if they thought my request was that unreasonable.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
QuantumCrab In reply to kaygirl101 [2014-10-01 18:16:16 +0000 UTC]
Shouldn't have to pay attention to, but I see it almost every piece of his. Go spend your time constructively.
π: 0 β©: 0
chriseastmids [2014-09-11 19:14:53 +0000 UTC]
brilliant
π: 0 β©: 0
Roal-Yr [2014-09-11 18:27:11 +0000 UTC]
Yes! Finally new works!
π: 0 β©: 1
Roal-Yr In reply to hypnothalamus [2014-09-11 19:54:30 +0000 UTC]
It was a pleasant surprise nevertheless.
π: 0 β©: 1
NextInLineX [2014-09-11 17:36:04 +0000 UTC]
That's... NewΒ
π: 0 β©: 0
Daniel-Loya-III [2014-09-11 17:11:40 +0000 UTC]
you have a very unique talent I must say!!
π: 0 β©: 0
NARAMA91 [2014-09-11 15:58:18 +0000 UTC]
Wonderful *.*
π: 0 β©: 0