HOME | DD
Iveyysaur β was deleted back ago
Published: 2015-09-04 18:16:59 +0000 UTC; Views: 53934; Favourites: 997; Downloads: 762
Redirect to original
Related content
Comments: 118
π: 0 β©: 0
She wan't most view, she's must make a more nudes.
π: 0 β©: 0
...I think I'm officially done with this shit of a site and how people can just upload sexual pics willy nilly...
π: 0 β©: 0
Funny how people see this as pornography, I mean if you wanna take it that way sure go ahead. I'm not gonna stop anyone for believing this is porn because its whatever you wanna make it, it can be art, porn, gross, whatever you want.
Personally I can see why people can look at it and say porn, but it doesn't break any rules and that's just my opinion. I honestly don't give a shit about the underage kids looking at this because:
1) Most of them probably have DA accounts and lied about they're age
2) They shouldn't have clicked on the picture
3) If they really had a problem with it they can report it and not make such a huge deal out of this.
To all the haters and 14 year old kids who are going as far as to commenting hate in this comment section. Fuck you, you clicked on the picture, your problem.
So I agree with matthew-lane and Alekaneklo-NeweleΒ you guys (and a few others here) know whats up. Art is art.
π: 0 β©: 0
its at this moment we realize that those people who are criticizing those who post art for it being nude, that they are against the idea that sex is a natural beautiful thing and there for should not be listened to and as such should think about their sex life and how they don't have one nor will ever have one if they continue. i bid you all a good day. and one more thing, if anyone sends me negative comments you will be blocked immediately and disposed of from my matters.
π: 0 β©: 1
I always find those people perplexing. They always think they know what is and is not art & have determined that nudes aren't art, an opinion that cannot be held by anyone who has ever walked through a classical art gallery.
π: 0 β©: 0
Guess what
Les Demoiselles d'Avignon
The Birth of Venus
The Creation of Adam
Olympia
These pieces wear made by great artists, and guess what, they have nude or almost nude people in all of them. And guess what, people all around the world see it as art, not porn. Just because someone is naked or almost naked doesn't mean its porn just because you say it is.
π: 0 β©: 1
It's so easy to say "It's art lol".
This bitch like a view.
π: 0 β©: 1
Like i said, its your opinion
π: 0 β©: 0
everything is art
π: 0 β©: 0
Stop posting half naked pictures on an art site you bafoon
π: 0 β©: 3
You do realize that the more you comment and view this kind of stuff, the faster it will get bumped up to the front page, right?Β
If you don't like it, scroll on by.Β You bafoon.
π: 0 β©: 0
"Hey Michelangelo stop posting images of half naked pictures on an art ceiling you bafoon"
- Some idiot upon seeing the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel.
506 years have passed & people are STILL making this idiot argument.
π: 0 β©: 0
LOL, you've never walked through a classical art gallery have you. If you think for a second that nudity isn't a common subject matter for art then you don't know the first thing about art.
π: 0 β©: 0
this should stay deleted to the defenders dos that mean i get repost pictures from a clothing site and call it art ...
π: 0 β©: 0
Why you join platform today & then immediately look up images of boobs to complain about, before even uploading a single piece of your own work??
π: 0 β©: 1
This is trash content, normal DeviantArt is dead. There is no place for artists here anymore.
π: 0 β©: 1
Guess what
Les Demoiselles d'Avignon
The Birth of Venus
The Creation of Adam
Olympia
These pieces wear made by great artists, and guess what, they have nude or almost nude people in all of them. And guess what, people all around the world see it as art, not porn. Just because someone is naked or almost naked doesn't mean its porn just because you say it is.
π: 0 β©: 0
WHY ARE PORNOGRAPHIC PICTURES ALWAYS END UP AT THE FRONT PAGE??? DA IS SUPPOSED TO BE AN ART SITE AND SAFE! PEOPLE LOOK AT IT IN PUBLIC OR CHILDRN DO!!Β i wouldnt mind if it wasnt as present as it is on this site or if it was hidden but for fuck sake's, on the FRONT page???? WHO even chose the pieces to go on the front page? I have some things to tell them... (plus its always the girls that are shown, hello sexism)
π: 0 β©: 5
"WHY ARE PORNOGRAPHIC PICTURES ALWAYS END UP AT THE FRONT PAGE??? DA IS SUPPOSED TO BE AN ART SITE AND SAFE! PEOPLE LOOK AT IT IN PUBLIC OR CHILDRN DO!!"
Firstly there is nothing pornographic about this image, if you think this image is pornographic you have lived a very sheltered life.
Secondly this appeared on the front page because a lot of people clicked on it & commented on it, including you, so YOU have now contributed to it appearing on the front page.
Thirdly, this site is rated 14+, you can't even have an account younger than 13, under the COPPA laws. So no, it's is not an all ages site, there should be no children on here at all & anyΒ child who is on here is not a platform issue, it's a lack of parental oversight issue.
π: 0 β©: 1
excuse me but 14 years old are still children,
and if you think a picture a girl in such underwears, posing like that is no pornography....you have a problem.Its a porn star promoting herself god damn it!
also i comented on it AFTER it ended on the front page, i wouldnt be on that kind of page if not.
It is simple to use an age restriction barrier on what you post, this is ridiculous...Β
π: 0 β©: 1
"excuse me but 14 years old are still children,"
no, they are young adults.
"and if you think a picture a girl in such underwears, posing like that is no pornography"
Then I would be 100% right. Not only does this not constitute pornography under dA's terms, it doesn't even constitute mature content. But don't take my word for it, here is dA's rules on what does & does not constitute pornography on their platform www.deviantartsupport.com/en/aβ¦Β & here's the rules pertaining to mature content www.deviantartsupport.com/en/aβ¦Β .
You'll note it doesn't fall in to either.
And now we've got past the technical stuff, lets move on to the subjective part. To reiterate if you think this is pornographic, you have lived an utterly sheltered life, you can see women this scantily clad simply by going toΒ a Β beach.
"Its a porn star promoting herself god damn it"
No, it's just a person uploading an image. There's no promotion involved, there's no link to a porn site, or any place where this person is making money. And yes, even porn stars are allowed to upload images to dA, you don't suddenly lose the ability to do so if one is also a porn star.
"also i comented on it AFTER it ended on the front page, i wouldnt be on that kind of page if not."
no, you CLICKED on it once you saw it on the front page, os you could come complain about it being on the front page. In fact I wrote a piece about people like you just the other week & it can be found here
The Whats Hot Moron.If you are seeing this journal entry, chances are good that someone has directed you to it, because you've just sought out the what's hot section, scrolled thru & looked for titties or vagina, so you could virtue signal how awesome you think you are by complaining about the existence of this image, by saying shit like "WHY IS THIS ON THE FRONT PAGE."
Well moron, it's on the front page because of you. In fact it'll be on the front page again a month from now because of you, well done, you done shot your self in the head, ya idjit.
Now already I can feel some of you becoming so triggered, you are screaming "NOOOOOO, IT'S BECAUSE OF YOU PERVERTS", as you are enshrouded in a cloud of chetto dust disturbed by your spastic arm movements as you slam your hands in to your keyboard impotently, refusing to accept the reality, that yeah, people like you are in fact just as responsible as anyone else, in fact MORE responsible than anyone else.
See the "what's hot" section is determined algorit
π: 0 β©: 1
She's a pornogirl.
"It's not porn" sale con va !Β
www.instagram.com/oreob4by/?hlβ¦
π: 0 β©: 1
"She's a pornogirl."
Doesn't matter. Why would you think what one does outside of creating art would make the art they create not art? Why would you ever assume that that would in any way be germane to this conversation?
π: 0 β©: 0
People are just too lazy to improve the website functionality, besides porn = money.
π: 0 β©: 0
I TOTALLY AGREE HOLY SHIT
π: 0 β©: 0
im pretty sure its diceded by view counts in small period of time so not really sexist ... should be deleted but its not sexist
π: 0 β©: 1
"should be deleted but its not sexist"
Why should it be deleted, it breaks none of the rules.
π: 0 β©: 1
because it has no value whats so ever the image is of extremely poor quality it cant even be used as reference for body shape due to the crappy quality
if you think it honestly belongs here then please explain to me what exactly it is you get out of it ? (this is assuming your not a troll and going to give me some kiddy answer)
as i also have said im open to see other points of view maybe you have a valid reason that i have no thought of i look forward to hearing from you ...
have a nice day
π: 0 β©: 1
"because it has no value whats so "
And you think this does?
What gives your image value exactly & the OP's image no value? Who determined that & what objective metric was used to measure this value? And if you can't give an objective metric for measuring value, only a subjective one, then you should delete everything in your account, because I have subjectively determined that nothing in your account is of value whatsoever. So which is it, do you have an objective metric with which to determine an images value, or are you going to delete everything in your account?
π: 0 β©: 1
so to sum that up you have no actual answer to my question ?
Β at which point why should i give you the courtesy of answering yours with anything but a question if that's all you are going to answer me with οΌ
π: 0 β©: 1
I answered your question by demonstrating your initial premise is in error. You won't answer the question because you now KNOW your initial premise is in error.
So again I reiterate: What gives your image value exactly & the OP's image no value? Who determined that & what objective metric was used to measure this value?
π: 0 β©: 1
well no actually if you read my original replay to you i said the image can not be used for even reference due to poor quality of the photo. The piece of work of mine you used may not be anything amazing however it can be used as a point of reference for that pose i have no issue with tits and ass or what ever the hell you want to post it can all be used to some extent to accomplish something this fails to do that due to the low pixel quality of the image if the quality of the image was "fine" then the deleted part of my comment would not have existed
i speak of the quality of image in terms of pixel quality not its exact content as pictures like this have been help in reference to work i have done outside of da
(sorry if my English is difficult to understand i am Chinese) Β
π: 0 β©: 1
"well no actually if you read my original replay to you i said the image can not be used for even reference due to poor quality of the photo."
And? Neither can this.
And yet here it is, still on your account.
"The piece of work of mine you used may not be anything amazing however it can be used as a point of reference for that pose "
Just like the OP's can.
"i have no issue with tits and ass or what ever the hell you want to post it can all be used to some extent to accomplish something this fails to do that "
No more or less than your own does.
"this fails to do that due to the low pixel quality of the image if the quality of the image was "fine" then the deleted part of my comment would not have existed "
Says the guy who drew shitty line art, on 3rd rate paper & then took a photo of it. You've got not a leg to stand on criticising other peoples work on those basis.
So now we've debunked all your justifications for why this piece of work should be deleted, I shall ask again: What gives your image value exactly & the OP's image no value? Who determined that & what objective metric was used to measure this value?
π: 0 β©: 1
wait wait i have no leg to stand on when it comes to being a critic due to my not so great work ? lmao ok so lets scrap every review ever made of a game film tv show etc because none of those people reviewing it make said content either ... lol also dos that not discredit your ability to protect it from criticism as your work is also low quality to dus your opinion must be as irrelevant as mine voiding everything you said so far if we are really gonna go by that logicΒ
again il repeat myself ... The piece of work of mine you used may not be anything amazing however it can be used as a point of reference for that pose
as that is still true were as the above can not be used due to low quality of the image im not really sure which part of that you don't understandΒ
but feel free to continue wasting your time arguing with me this is good practice for my English
π: 0 β©: 1
"wait wait i have no leg to stand on when it comes to being a critic due to my not so great work ?"
Don't mistake anything you are doing for being a critic, you are not being a critic, you are being a wannabe authoritarian, a moral scold. Which is why you didn't review the work, you simply stated that it should be deleted & then went and declared that it had no value, all because of traits possessed by your own poor work.
So if you are planning on being intellectually honest & you have decided that anything that possesses the negative features you've decided make an image worthless & so requiring of deletion, then you must also conclude that you should be deleting your own work, since your own work, by your own metrics are completely worthless & deserving of deleting.
"lol also dos that not discredit your ability to protect it from criticism"
Mate I don't give a fuck about this users shitty photo, no one is defending it, it's your shitty position that is being taken to task here. Β
Now let me make this abundantly clear: There is no reason for this image to be deleted, it falls in to the category of photography & does not break any of the rules of the platform. Your shitty opinion on what is & is not worthy is utterly immaterial, unless it breaks one of the platforms rules, there is no reason why this, or any other image should not continue on on this platform.
π: 0 β©: 2
by metrics (again im Chinese not English) are you suggesting my measure of rule ? if that's the case my measure of rule for "reviewing" is simple the pixel quality of this image is way to low if i have any work i have posted of an unclear pixel i will happily delete it my work is by no means great however the pixel quality of what i am trying to show is "fine" like most of the other pictures from this account also reach said "fine" standard however this one specifically dos not...
actually my opinion dos have value sorry to break it to you but in the west opinions hold alot of wight if a majority start to agree with an opinion that is being pushed things change to suit that opinion so actually yes my and anyone elses opinion with enough backing dos have value 
and please don't call meΒ mate
also call me an authoritarian then tell me im not allowed an opinion ... interesting are you a kettle ?
π: 0 β©: 1
"by metrics (again im Chinese not English)"
Okay stop, I was ignoring this game you insist on playing where you pretend you are Chinese accessing the site from China, we both know you are not, so how about you pack it in and stop pretending it's an utterlyΒ sad pretence, especially considering everyone can see your IP address. If you are going to pretend you are Chinese at least go to the trouble of masking your uploader IP address.
"actually my opinion dos have value sorry "
No it doesn't, which is why this image will continue to remain on this platform for years to come, contrary to your opinion that it should be deleted.
"also call me an authoritarian then tell me im not allowed an opinion"
No where was it said that you can't have an opinion, you were simply informed that your opinion is wrong.
π: 0 β©: 1
hahahahahah tracker hahahaha ok so i dont live in Shenzhen china ?
so this inst my Chinese office ?
this isnt my Chinese class
sorry i don't know how or what you tracked but if you did track me you should have ended up in Shenzhen what ever method you used clearly dos not work or you didnt track me at all which seems likely which is very sad i actually thought i was talking to an intelligent person not a troll my mistake :/ Β
cant wait for your some how denil comment as your the type of person who can never accept they where wrong
so go on tell me how i dont live in china again ?Β
π: 0 β©: 0
by metrics (again im Chinese not English) are you suggesting my measure of rule ? if that's the case my measure of rule for "reviewing" is simple the pixel quality of this image is way to low if i have any work i have posted of an unclear pixel i will happily delete it my work is by no means great however the pixel quality of what i am trying to show is "fine" like most of the other pictures from this account also reach said "fine" standard however this one specifically dos not...
actually my opinion dos have value sorry to break it to you but in the west opinions hold alot of wight if a majority start to agree with an opinion that is being pushed things change to suit that opinion so actually yes my and anyone elses opinion with enough backing dos have value
and please don't call meΒ mate
also call me an authoritarian then tell me im not allowed an opinion ... interesting are you a kettle ?
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>