Comments: 19
bloodrose83 In reply to JLDragonfly [2010-05-28 02:56:49 +0000 UTC]
I'm not sure that's a bad thing.
Always fun when that happens.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JLDragonfly In reply to bloodrose83 [2010-05-28 13:10:50 +0000 UTC]
not bad, just anoying as i it gives me far less of an idea of when i'll be 'done.'
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bloodrose83 In reply to JLDragonfly [2010-05-28 17:30:34 +0000 UTC]
At least you're making some progress, right? It's a step in the right direction, and don't try to be done in too much of a hurry. Otherwise you'll have two books to massively overhaul.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bloodrose83 In reply to JLDragonfly [2010-05-29 00:49:54 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I'm sure doing two at once is a challenge.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JLDragonfly In reply to bloodrose83 [2010-05-29 02:31:24 +0000 UTC]
meh, the old ones pretty much back-burnered.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bloodrose83 In reply to JLDragonfly [2010-05-29 02:53:00 +0000 UTC]
Maybe take it back in December and edit then if this one's done or almost done?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JLDragonfly In reply to bloodrose83 [2010-05-29 15:22:53 +0000 UTC]
ya lost me.....
i'm tryign to get published with jathen....if that happens, it will turn into a triligy, and if that continues to do well...then maybe the other will get re-hashed. until then.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bloodrose83 In reply to JLDragonfly [2010-05-29 21:07:34 +0000 UTC]
I was referring to the one you sent out already. If you decided to get it back in December and work on it, you could fix what you found incorrect about it. That's what I meant.
Getting anything out beside dialogue for the Jathen stuff yet?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bloodrose83 In reply to JLDragonfly [2010-05-30 20:58:37 +0000 UTC]
...Because the publishing company had it. For some reason I thought they had it and you were waiting for it to come back. But that's me having a slow moment, I think.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1