Comments: 31
Lolicoom [2022-03-29 03:11:54 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dizzy-tan [2017-06-09 02:37:40 +0000 UTC]
So cute!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RaildexDave [2017-06-06 21:38:16 +0000 UTC]
Cute Sagiri-chan. :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Shugo19 [2017-06-06 06:55:36 +0000 UTC]
Awesome Work !
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Mi-LordoZ [2017-06-05 05:28:10 +0000 UTC]
Does she ever wear panties?
By her actions in episodes, I dont think so XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
rbskullhead In reply to Mi-LordoZ [2017-06-08 18:09:04 +0000 UTC]
She looks like she's wearing underwear
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
A3Kitsune [2017-06-04 17:21:33 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DannyAndYoko [2017-06-04 09:10:12 +0000 UTC]
She's adorable =3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bonnman100 [2017-06-04 02:30:59 +0000 UTC]
I will never understand how they get away with showing this on Japanese television...
I tried watching it after someone described it as (controversial)... lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tasorius2 In reply to bonnman100 [2017-06-08 14:07:39 +0000 UTC]
Nothing controversial about it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bonnman100 In reply to Tasorius2 [2017-06-08 14:45:15 +0000 UTC]
It's a sibling romance depicting lewd kids... lol
It's controversial bud...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tasorius2 In reply to bonnman100 [2017-06-08 16:54:25 +0000 UTC]
They aren't siblings, and nothing actually happened.
Also, she is 16 years old, so not a child.
Wrong on all accounts.
Not if you have reached the point where you don't judge others for silly reasons.
Live and let live, while no one is harmed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bonnman100 In reply to Tasorius2 [2017-06-09 05:08:48 +0000 UTC]
Step-siblings sure...
However, she is 12 and her brother is 15 through the show. Not sure where you got 16.
And who am I judging? The director...
Both a 12 and 14 y/o are almost fully exposed in the first 4 episodes. I'm not sure why you are so desperately trying to justify this show like you have something to be worried about. No need to be a denialist..
I appreciate the artwork and I simply made the obvious conclusion that the show is quite inappropriate. But it's in airs in a foreign country, so different rules apply. You can like the show and the artwork, while accepting that fact. It doesn't have to be a one way deal...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tasorius2 In reply to bonnman100 [2017-06-09 17:20:45 +0000 UTC]
You are just making numbers up.
Look her actual age up and you will know that you are wrong.
You have no right to judge anyone over this.
I'm not denying anything. I love anime girls of several ages. Nothing wrong with that.
I just hate it when people make stuff up and treat those thigns as facts.
This conclusion of yours is only obvious to people who are judgmental.
I stand above such things.
When I judge someone it is because they did something terrible, like killing innocent people or destroying the lives of innocent people.
Never for a stupid reason like this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bonnman100 In reply to Tasorius2 [2017-06-10 04:58:42 +0000 UTC]
Her age is listed on both the show's bio, Sagiri's anime wiki page and the Eromanga show page. (12) years old...
I have no right to judge anyone over this. What does that even mean, it's a rather pointless statement... I never made anything up bud, please do some research and cross referencing...
You sit there and tell me that you hate when people make things up and call them facts, when you are doing (exactly that). Do you not see the irony?
Sagiri is a first year (Junior High student). She is 12 years old. The nuisance blond musician (Elf) is 14 years old. Please READ THE BIOS from the show and the characters.
Reality is not subjective, which you implied when you claimed by conclusion was judgmental. You have to be a kid. Nobody can honestly sit there and continuously throw a fit because they don't like the facts.
eromanga-senseiusa.com/charact…
If you're still going to argue that she's 16, after looking at the website then you are either trolling or have some severe brain disability.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tasorius2 In reply to bonnman100 [2017-06-10 06:21:13 +0000 UTC]
Or I wasn't paying attention, and read "Ero Ero" as "Erio", and for some reason thought that it was Touwa Erio...
As for your judgments, it's animated, so it doesn't matter what age they are.
And it's the anime world, so it's different from this world. Different physics may apply.
I wish people understood that they cannot judge stuff in anime based on the rules of this world.
No one is harmed by animated stuff, no matter how inappropriate you find it.
Horror anime is a different matter though. That scars you for life.
You can only get offended by this kind of stuff, if you are judgmental enough, and don't understand the difference between it and this world.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bonnman100 In reply to Tasorius2 [2017-06-10 10:30:55 +0000 UTC]
Who is being offended.......................................................???
The conclusions I draw from it don't really affect me one way or another personally. However, you must realize that everything has an equal and opposite reaction, socially and culturally.
I know there are plenty of people watching this show that have seen hundreds of anime's and are just adding another to the list. However, it's not judgmental in the slightest to acknowledge that this anime specifically attempts to normalize inter-family relationships and sexualization of children one way or another. Can't say I've seen another anime that had that combination to the extent this does. And given the (wrong types of people) you can easily further perpetuate a disgusting sub-culture if you're not careful.
It's really no different on a social level and by principle, if you were making an anime that conveys rape or sodomy as acceptable. It accomplishes the same goal one way or another by allowing mentally ill people to think child sexualization is now an acceptable form of art/television. It attracts all the wrong types of people and by giving into their fantasies, you not only widen their eyes, but create even more people that fit in that category. Television has a rather bizarre and powerful effect on the mind and it shouldn't be taken lightly by the people producing it.
Like I said, I like the artwork don't get me wrong. But there's a reason why I object to the show and it's content.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tasorius2 In reply to bonnman100 [2017-06-10 11:28:04 +0000 UTC]
You are offended by the content because you are comparing it to this world, when you shouldn't.
And if that reaction is too extreme, it is the fault of the one having the reaction.
The more judgmental and ignorant someone is, the more likely they are to have a too extreme reaction.
You cannot compare an anime to this world. It's completely different.
What you are suggesting is a gross form of censorship.
You are just making stuff up that has not really been proved.
What is proved is that Japan has a low crime rate compared to countries with censorship like that.
The reason being that you are judgmental for the wrong reason.
You don't care about the anime itself. All you are talking about is censorship based on the fact that there are insane people out there.
What you are ignoring, is the fact that insane people would exist either way and your argument doesn't work in reality.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bonnman100 In reply to Tasorius2 [2017-06-10 16:17:07 +0000 UTC]
Look bud, I really think you're over your head on this subject. My background and major was in Criminology and Law Enforcement. People perpetuate things all the time they see on television, especially if there is no moral construct to begin with in their personal lives, which is a large portion of certain populations. Especially illegitimate ones.
I don't consider it a gross form of censorship to refrain from sexualizing children. And most people would agree with that statement.
A person's degree or ethic or moral obligation to society is not arbitrarily good natured. It's conditioned by their environment.
Should we be airing pornographic material on regular cable channels all hours of the day? Or is that yet another gross form of censorship, and one that is only prone to (insane) persons?
I also like how your attempted insert the (judgmental - ignorant) conversion there. Which I'm not sure where you got from.
Btw, I'm not sure why you are comparing Japan's crime rate with censorship. I really don't understand how that comes into play.
Crime rates are dependent on the culture, social fabric, and family legitimacy of any country.
Our talking point is on subject matter that could perpetuate perverted and/or pedophiliac behavior or tendencies for any and all audiences.
And another thing, you are aware that Japan has extreme pornographic censorship for any lawfully released material, right?
Reality is not subjective, as you have time and time again attempted to imply.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tasorius2 In reply to bonnman100 [2017-06-10 16:57:08 +0000 UTC]
You also live in a country where the rich can get away with anything and the poor can barely get away with being innocent.
Your prisons are barbaric and there are a lot of innocent people and non-violent criminals mixed in with the violent criminals.
A terrible system in every way.
Children were never attractive in any way. Anime girls are completely different and incomparable.
I am extremely offended when anime girls are compared to those things.
That statement reflects your ignorance on the subject.
You are comparing very different things.
That's what the Internet is for.
Being judgmental and ignorant often go together.
I guess censorship may be the wrong word to use.
I am talking about the fact that they are not as insane when it comes to mere drawings and animations.
In the west there are a lot of scum with false/religious "morals".
Real morals are all about "live and let live, while no one is harmed".
I have higher moral standards than people like that, and you.
If you take it all away, the people who watch it and are actually mentally ill or morally insane, would actually do terrible things, instead of having fantasies.
They are a minority within a minority by the way. Why generalize to extremes and prioritize the minority, while destroying a lot of things for everyone else...?
That's why you reasoning is backwards. You don't understand how the world works.
That's a weird and different kind of problem...
Do not presume to know what my intentions are.
i never tried to do something like that.
I just disagree with your view on reality, which is a subjective view and not the absolute truth.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bonnman100 In reply to Tasorius2 [2017-06-10 23:03:20 +0000 UTC]
I knew this was about unearned moral superiority. It always is with arrogant patronizing snobs. Always about making the other person a terrible human being without showing any actual righteous behavior themselves.
I can't believe that this went from me having a slight criticism of an anime sexualizing children, to you blatantly going all out to defend it. You could have easily just accepted that a great number of people think it's questionable material, alongside pretty artwork. But no, you have to show your ass and pedophiliac tendencies for the entire world to see. The length you are going in order to defend any and all criticism proves this. So they portray a young girl stripping, taking lewd photos, drawings, and a nude kid playing piano. I have a criticism of it, AND then you call me judgmental and ignorant for doing so?
Congratulations...
So, by your logic, since it's a cartoon we should just air whatever the hell people want on television. Maybe we should just start putting anime pornography on prime-time, and hey (make it under-age as well) who cares right? It's not hurting anybody. What an ass-backwards way of thinking..
Also, morals are not arbitrary, they come from a long line of religious and cultural practices sewn into the social fabric of society. You think people are just naturally good or naturally insane? It doesn't work that way.
Whether you are religious or not is irrelevant to the subject. I'm not whatsoever. And if you think that statement is false, then ask yourself this. Are murder, rape, incest, and theft rational decisions? Of course they are if it benefits the person in question. But they are immoral to society. It is not about believing in a God, it is about the fear of possible eternal repercussions.
And when did I ever say that the majority of viewers were going to go insane with these fantasies? I said it can perpetuate behaviors in people who already have these tendencies, expand on it, and normalize it.
You say in every comment that I don't understand how the world works, please prove to me that you do because you are failing time and time again. The same goes with your rich and poor analogy, assuming that one of the other is victimized. Sorry, but you just proved you have little understand of how the world works.
In the west, poor people that are poverty stricken for life, are so because they make bad financial decisions. The Brookings Institute can confirm through IRS data that 75% of persons were in the middle class within 10 years, had they finished high-school, became employed, and did not have children out of wedlock. Who would have thought? And btw, in the 21st century it is extremely difficult to imprison somebody without both circumstantial and physical evidence. So your statement is false, again...
Please walk outside for once and actually look around.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tasorius2 In reply to bonnman100 [2017-06-10 23:55:47 +0000 UTC]
There is nothing unearned about my moral superiority.
I follow the words "live and let live, while no one is harmed".
I do not judge people for their attractions, and I do not label and generalize people.
I will defend anyone who hasn't hurt anyone, when people like you judge them.
Never describe me with words like "pedophiliac". It does not apply to me.
I am disgusted by the ugly imps you refer to as children.
You have no right to compare them to pretty anime girls.
And you are adding a lot more into this.
I never even watched that anime, so you can definitely not use that against me either.
If you think anything I said proves something about me, you are delusional.
You are the person at fault here. The person throwing around labels and generalizing to extremes.
Defending freedom of expression does not equal wanting it to go on television.
I never said anything about television. You need to control your delusions and not make shit up about people, on top of the other shit you just pulled.
It is the person judging someone over mere drawings who has a backwards way of thinking.
Those are not real morals. Real morals, like I already said, are about the ideal "live and let live, while no one is harmed".
Those morals include wanting to execute every rapist in existence on the spot, because their existence is unforgivable.
Meanwhile you are sitting there and judging and labeling people who never hurt anyone, and you are calling it "morals", even though it is far from it.
There is a massive difference between terrible things like murder and rape, and a lesser non-violent crime like theft.
Actual incest is unhealthy, but this is not real life we are talking about, so the same does not apply.
Also, if the morals you speak of are based on fear, then they are not real morals.
Real morals come from honestly not wanting bad thing to happen to innocent people who never hurt anyone.
That is what my morals are about.
I don't say that you said that. You must have misunderstood something.
That has happened a lot in this so called "argument".
Rather... You don't understand how attractions work, and that suppressing attractions is more likely to cause an unstable person to act on their attractions.
You may want to think about how courts work, and how long someone can be kept in a prison before they are even convicted of anything.
There is a lot of corruption, and if you don't see it, you are the one who do not understand how things work.
All they have to do in these times is call someone a terrorist, for any reason, and it all works out for them.
They are using the situation to their advantage. Lawyers, cops and all things related to them.
It is a thing that happens, and calling it false, is an insult to all the victims.
I have nothing to look at here. Your country is what has all these problems.
You should learn not to assume that you know everything and that you can judge and label people who haven't done anything.
I need to learn to ignore people like you, because the angrier I get, the more shit you throw at me. i react emotionally, and then you use that against me as well, while continuing to throw insults at me.
I react emotionally to the shit people like you throw at me and others.
The world is shitty enough as it is, so why judge people and throw labels and insults at them over mere drawings...?
No one needs that...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bonnman100 In reply to Tasorius2 [2017-06-11 00:18:28 +0000 UTC]
You react emotionally... Yeah, problem number one, seek help.
And that's not some grossly over-exaggerated insult, I'm dead serious. Please talk to a psychologist about it.
Btw, from your history this doesn't seem to be the first encounter you've had with that sort of tone with other users. That should be a hint and a half.
Who said I knew everything? Nothing I wrote to you was off center or made up, I simply responded to each talking point that you brought up in every scenario. You should re-read what you wrote. Every time I countered an accusation or argument, you switched to something else.
Nobody said anything about judging a drawing, we're talking about an anime series called Eromanga Sensei.
If I am going to be labeled judgmental and ignorant for calling a show (inappropriate) that features children in sexualized themes, then you have your priorities mixed up. The point here is principle, if depicting lewd kids is ok simply because (they're not real), then I don't see why prime-time porn or child sexualization on regular television would be a problem (given your argument). Live and let live implies that people are at heart good natured and should have all freedoms at their disposal. That is so far from the truth it's not even funny. Human beings are conditioned by their culture and environment.
The problem here is the "all animals are equal mentality." Where there is some alternate reality you have more right to be upset about something that other people because of some misplaced righteousness. Things don't work like that I'm sorry to say.
And as a constructive criticism for the future, you should refrain from anecdotes to try and prove your point. I even gave you empirical and statistical evidence for several of the arguments, but (again) the topic got pushed to avoid cognitive dissonance.
Just do what you want bud, I'm done...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tasorius2 In reply to bonnman100 [2017-06-11 00:46:29 +0000 UTC]
So I need to seek help because I react emotionally when being attacked and when someone makes shit up about me, that isn't true...?
You are too delusional to reason with.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0