Comments: 37
femelushka [2014-04-17 17:53:02 +0000 UTC]
good contrast
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Poserhobbit [2009-05-17 05:11:37 +0000 UTC]
Fantastic render!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
oktow [2009-05-02 07:04:49 +0000 UTC]
nice work..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ken1171 In reply to oktow [2009-05-02 08:41:03 +0000 UTC]
^____^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
hleon [2009-04-30 20:47:24 +0000 UTC]
SO awesome!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
anitalee [2009-04-30 20:22:19 +0000 UTC]
Lovely
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ken1171 In reply to anitalee [2009-04-30 20:24:10 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! ^_______^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
anitalee In reply to ken1171 [2009-05-04 16:06:32 +0000 UTC]
You are welcome
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bear48 [2009-04-30 19:24:14 +0000 UTC]
sweet job
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ken1171 In reply to bear48 [2009-04-30 20:23:48 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Delta36 [2009-04-30 16:15:24 +0000 UTC]
Wow good color, her hair looks awesome too, good work Kenken.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BishounenTaurus [2009-04-30 14:55:46 +0000 UTC]
Wait, that's POSER DYNAMIC HAIR?
Wow, pretty spiffy. I've never seen a decent Poser Dynamic hairstyle before.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DAaZ-Land [2009-04-30 12:51:30 +0000 UTC]
Damn sexy !
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AcanthAI [2009-04-30 12:47:33 +0000 UTC]
Dynamic hair + dynamic cloth + raytraced shadows + IBL+ HDRI + mapped shadows (hair only) = Dynamicly raytraced mapped woman
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AcanthAI In reply to ken1171 [2009-04-30 13:01:17 +0000 UTC]
But is the hair = 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ken1171 In reply to AcanthAI [2009-04-30 13:02:47 +0000 UTC]
The hair was rendered separately using soft mapped shadows.
Raytracing dynamic hair looks horrible in Poser for some reason. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AcanthAI In reply to ken1171 [2009-04-30 13:06:42 +0000 UTC]
Which means...
Oh no!
If you didn't raytrace the hair that means it doesn't exist, and the number given to a non existent figure is 0!
WE DIVIDED BY 0!!
NOOOOOOOOOOO
*everything implodes*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1