HOME | DD

ken1171 — -Vicky With Sword in Temple-

Published: 2009-04-21 08:19:51 +0000 UTC; Views: 8308; Favourites: 138; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description ~Vicky With Sword in Temple~

When Poser was first released over a decade ago, 90% of the people was making pics of naked Vicky in some temple with a sword. Due to historical reasons, this is something all Poser artists must have in their galleries - though my Vicky is not naked. LOL

Figure is V4. Hope you like it and thanks for coming by!
Related content
Comments: 83

ken1171 In reply to ??? [2009-10-15 22:31:06 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! You might also like the animated version [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bear48 [2009-06-06 18:57:42 +0000 UTC]

Another very surreal image

A post apocalyptic barbarian survivor wild girl????

An emortal maybe???

nice job all the same

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ken1171 In reply to bear48 [2009-06-06 23:18:19 +0000 UTC]

Hehe this is historically significant to Poser users, because in the beginning everybody was making pics of Vicky in a temple with a sword. LOL

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bear48 In reply to ken1171 [2009-06-08 19:14:22 +0000 UTC]

I see

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ken1171 In reply to bear48 [2009-06-08 20:15:22 +0000 UTC]

Of course, Vicky-in-temple-with-sword was also naked, but I didn't want to go *that* low.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bear48 In reply to ken1171 [2009-06-08 23:55:02 +0000 UTC]

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah, why not

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ken1171 In reply to bear48 [2009-06-09 01:14:14 +0000 UTC]

Perhaps because nearly everybody else is posting nudity-only and I don't want to be part of that crowd. I would probably get way more attention, but that's not the kind of attention I am looking for.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bear48 In reply to ken1171 [2009-06-09 18:25:18 +0000 UTC]

Uderstood and wise

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ken1171 In reply to bear48 [2009-06-09 22:23:14 +0000 UTC]

Ironically, some people claim it would be wiser for me to capitalize on nudes because (based on page hits observation) that's what people want. But there is a difference between what people want and what I want. In my gallery there is a bit of concessions, it's a give and take.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bear48 In reply to ken1171 [2009-06-10 00:02:02 +0000 UTC]

Yes but wold you work be seen or just the nude

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ken1171 In reply to bear48 [2009-06-10 01:43:49 +0000 UTC]

In my experience, people attracted to nude pics stop looking at the artistic side and composition. That becomes 2nd place and out of perspective. But what really bothers me is that it soon becomes an obsession to them, because they stop commenting on anything I post that does not contain nudity. It's really a trap, and I am not falling for that (again).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bear48 In reply to ken1171 [2009-06-10 18:25:44 +0000 UTC]

Like I said a wise man

I am careful to have reasons for doing a nude and do not do one just to do a nude

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ken1171 In reply to bear48 [2009-06-10 18:35:33 +0000 UTC]

I have posted a couple of nudes in my gallery because I don't want to exclude anything. I just don't want to make a habit of it. I really believe that skimpy clad pinups are sexier than nude ones, simply because the latter lost all mystery because there was nothing left to be discovered.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bear48 In reply to ken1171 [2009-06-10 18:36:17 +0000 UTC]

right

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Poserhobbit [2009-04-26 04:18:20 +0000 UTC]

Gorgeous!! No cheating, Ken...you have to do one without clothing for it to count!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ken1171 In reply to Poserhobbit [2009-04-26 06:12:58 +0000 UTC]

But I do nudes once in a while...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ascavilya [2009-04-25 21:57:08 +0000 UTC]

Hehehehe. Very nice Ken. It reminds me that I still need to do my Vicki in a Temple with a sword. I think she's been in one with just about everything else.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ken1171 In reply to Ascavilya [2009-04-25 21:58:37 +0000 UTC]

We have to cover the essentials! LOL
Don't miss the animated version --> [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ascavilya In reply to ken1171 [2009-04-25 23:16:54 +0000 UTC]

Hehehehe. Damn straight.

Nice work on the anim. I've been playing a bit with that recently myself but haven't done anything yet that I'd be happy showing the rest of the world. lol.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ken1171 In reply to Ascavilya [2009-04-26 02:56:36 +0000 UTC]

Have to start somewhere.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ascavilya In reply to ken1171 [2009-04-26 03:15:18 +0000 UTC]

Yup, not a truer word was spoken.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RedWingsDragon [2009-04-23 05:31:37 +0000 UTC]

Hmmm yes hot work ere

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ken1171 In reply to RedWingsDragon [2009-04-23 07:01:32 +0000 UTC]

And there is the animated version.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheBlindBat [2009-04-22 04:55:40 +0000 UTC]

It was NVIATWAS not VIATWAS.....

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ken1171 In reply to TheBlindBat [2009-04-22 05:31:41 +0000 UTC]

LOL I guess you are right, but the order doesn't matter so much when Vicky is not even nude in my version. Nonetheless nobody can complain I didn't do the essential contents in my gallery now!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheBlindBat In reply to ken1171 [2009-04-22 05:33:11 +0000 UTC]

You are now official indoctrinated into the fantasy world of not-so-nekkid Vickies.



I think I did a render sometime ago like that with V4 naked but I covered her essentials or something... Seems like ages ago.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ken1171 In reply to TheBlindBat [2009-04-22 06:37:14 +0000 UTC]

I kinda restricted the number of nudes in my gallery because I don't want to be associated with that kind of publicity. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheBlindBat In reply to ken1171 [2009-04-22 10:50:57 +0000 UTC]

Understandable. You could always toon them and cover up important parts, too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ken1171 In reply to TheBlindBat [2009-04-22 11:01:33 +0000 UTC]

I personally think that hiding produces better sexiness than nudes. One of my renders even got deleted from Renderosity when both characters were fully dressed and there was no nudity whatsoever. The mods thought it was too sexy because of pure suggestion, not something I revealed. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheBlindBat In reply to ken1171 [2009-04-22 11:26:37 +0000 UTC]

lol, I had a render here get removed because a dog had a play toy in its mouth that a fully dressed girl was trying to get back. I was like, yeah, ok, no sexual anything going on but they zapped it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ken1171 In reply to TheBlindBat [2009-04-22 20:08:35 +0000 UTC]

And at the same time explicit frontal nudes get DDs everyday here at dA. Explicit genitals on-your-face are acceptable, but the simple suggestion of something else gets busted. That kind of confirms my belief that suggestion is more effective than plain nudity.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheBlindBat In reply to ken1171 [2009-04-22 20:18:08 +0000 UTC]

That, and in truth, usually the imagining of what is under the clothes or behind the obstacle is probably superior to what actually is... lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ken1171 In reply to TheBlindBat [2009-04-22 20:42:36 +0000 UTC]

Very true - things from the real world can never be better than what the imagination makes of them. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheBlindBat In reply to ken1171 [2009-04-23 19:10:48 +0000 UTC]

That's such a bummer.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ken1171 In reply to TheBlindBat [2009-04-24 00:33:22 +0000 UTC]

Nonetheless, the Lord of the Rings movies (all 3) seem to be an exception to that rule. I read all the books but the movies are equally amazing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheBlindBat In reply to ken1171 [2009-04-24 01:15:50 +0000 UTC]

The movies were great but they still hardly tapped the depth of the books, I thought. They rarely do, especially with the best book authors.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ken1171 In reply to TheBlindBat [2009-04-24 06:41:35 +0000 UTC]

Can't say I didn't like the movies though. They were just amazing! ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheBlindBat In reply to ken1171 [2009-04-24 06:59:03 +0000 UTC]

As long as a movie is fun, it's a good movie.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ken1171 In reply to TheBlindBat [2009-04-24 07:04:54 +0000 UTC]

Comparing to all the junk they have in the video stores and movie theaters, it's very hard to find movies as good as those nowadays.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheBlindBat In reply to ken1171 [2009-04-24 07:40:06 +0000 UTC]

It's pretty much only the epic type movies that are good anymore. It's even hard to find a good action-comedy anymore. At least there's Jackie Chan still.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ken1171 In reply to TheBlindBat [2009-04-24 09:40:09 +0000 UTC]

Only some of the Jackie Chan movies are good.
For example, "The Medallion" was pretty weak...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheBlindBat In reply to ken1171 [2009-04-24 10:05:02 +0000 UTC]

Sort of silly, yeah. We liked the one with him and Jet Li about that lost kingdom or whatever. Been a while. And him and Chris Rock are funny. And the western ones had a special charm to them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ken1171 In reply to TheBlindBat [2009-04-24 20:21:19 +0000 UTC]

I agree to all of the movies you've mention, and I think his movie with Jet Li was one of a kind. I especially liked the "Rush Hour" movies, where the last one in France was really good! ^__^

Still, I think Jackie Chan has been trying to make too many movies and part of them didn't deliver what we (his fans) expect from him. I think he has become too "commercial" and that affects the quality of his movies.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheBlindBat In reply to ken1171 [2009-04-24 22:20:15 +0000 UTC]

I think he's running out of time in which he can still make the movies. lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ken1171 In reply to TheBlindBat [2009-04-24 23:35:01 +0000 UTC]

I just think he is trying to make too many movies.
Perhaps fewer and better would be preferable. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheBlindBat In reply to ken1171 [2009-04-24 23:37:37 +0000 UTC]

I wonder how long before he injures himself permanently doing his own stunts...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ken1171 In reply to TheBlindBat [2009-04-24 23:45:29 +0000 UTC]

Haha He already broke *every* single bone in his body by now!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheBlindBat In reply to ken1171 [2009-04-25 01:07:42 +0000 UTC]

Makes you wonder how he can walk straight.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ken1171 In reply to TheBlindBat [2009-04-25 03:18:16 +0000 UTC]

Probably because he always been an athlete.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

archclan [2009-04-22 04:44:27 +0000 UTC]

really cool!!! now time to make my naked Vicky in some temple with a sword.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>