Comments: 167
PsdDude [2020-02-21 08:10:44 +0000 UTC]
So beautiful, I love it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
whitebearboy [2019-02-20 03:48:36 +0000 UTC]
This is stunningly beautiful!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
tsahel [2016-07-30 02:28:20 +0000 UTC]
Superb !
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kokieciara [2016-07-16 06:18:54 +0000 UTC]
<3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Charlene-Art [2015-12-16 14:11:16 +0000 UTC]
fantastic concept!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kavita-alore [2015-10-04 03:51:58 +0000 UTC]
This is amazing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Angie-Pictures [2015-08-01 12:43:29 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful work! Congratulations on the DD!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FurorArt [2015-08-01 10:14:44 +0000 UTC]
Your amazing artwork is featured here ARTIST OF THE MONTH JULY / MEMBERS DDs
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KingaBritschgi In reply to funnies50 [2015-07-26 15:42:32 +0000 UTC]
Thanks a lot! (However, I don't do any photography...)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Andracus [2015-07-25 08:54:20 +0000 UTC]
'That shining dress full of stars, stars and moons, that's what she has alway dreamed of'. Liberal translation of a line from a German song that came to my mind. Lovely!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MogachiMoe [2015-07-25 03:08:51 +0000 UTC]
beautiful :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ArtsyBlueWolf [2015-07-24 00:06:19 +0000 UTC]
This is so beautiful!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
21diasdeAmore [2015-07-22 04:08:32 +0000 UTC]
I had to fave it ♥
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheMessedHetalian [2015-07-21 01:57:35 +0000 UTC]
ATTENTION ARTISTS
Copyright law is about to change
For more than a year Congress has been holding hearings for the drafting of a brand new US Copyright Act. At its heart is the return of Orphan Works
What does this mean for artists? it means it will make it easier for infringers to steal artists works and harder for people who are making or trying to make a living out of art more difficult. This will effect every artist and all the artwork they have created, are creating, and will be created. Corporates, Big businesses, and publishers want this to pass to make money out off artists works without paying us artists for past, current, and future artwork.
Basic Facts About The Law Being Proposed
- “The Next Great Copyright Act” would replace all existing copyright law.
- It would void our Constitutional right to the exclusive control of our work.
- It would “privilege” the public’s right to use our work.
- It would “pressure” you to register your work with commercial registries.
- It would “orphan” unregistered work.
- It would make orphaned work available for commercial infringement by “good faith” infringers.
- It would allow others to alter your work and copyright these “derivative works” in their own names.
- It would affect all visual art: drawings, paintings, sketches, photos, etc.; past, present and future; published and unpublished; domestic and foreign.
** Ways to stop this or preventing these changes from happening**
> > > > > > > DEADLINE IS NEXT THURSDAY: JULY 23, 2015 < < < < < <
- share, this post, spread it for other artists to take notice and action.
- You can submit a letter on how this law can be an issue for you as an artist here: copyright.gov/policy/visualwor…
- Non-U.S. artists can email their letters to the attention of:
Catherine Rowland
Senior Advisor to the Register of Copyrights
U.S. Copyright Office
crowland@loc.gov
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KingaBritschgi In reply to TheMessedHetalian [2015-07-21 03:52:06 +0000 UTC]
Because of the seriousness of the question and the scare factor I felt I needed to reply this unsolicited comment publicly. With this reply, however I declare this business closed for myself. Please do not litter my section of dA with this kind of fake threats for lack of facts and misrepresentation of the truth. Thanks.
So here we go (source )
1. There is no legislation before the Congress. The U.S. Copyright office has compiled a report and - as a normal everyday procedure in this neck of the world - they are merely asking for everyone's input (a.k.a. brainstorming). You can read the full report yourself here .
2. It mostly deals with the 2006 and 2008 Orphan Works, Fair Use, and a few other (not vital) copyright issues (have you actually look thoroughly into what an 'Orphan Work' is?)
3. As I mentioned these are mere suggestions for legislation. Nothing, I repeat again, nothing is before the Congress. No need to use scare tactic here.
4. Some highlights just to show you what we are talking about in reality (and not in your threatening post):
- Give copyright owners the right to limit the grant of licenses with respect to their works or to opt out of the system entirely. I repeat: OPT OUT.
- Permit the licensed works to be used only for nonprofit educational or research purposes and without any purpose of direct or indirect commercial advantage. (Say after me: without any purpose of direct or indirect commercial advantage.)
- Require the parties to negotiate terms obligating the user, as a condition of its license, to implement and maintain reasonable digital security measures controlling access to the relevant works. (Hello! Important: obligating the user...)
- Provide for the disposition of royalties remaining unclaimed after a specified period. (Again, don't forget, we are talking about Orphan Works in these suggestions!)
To summarize what relates to us, artists:
There’d be one group you could go to so that one can figure out who owns what copyright, get permission, and pay whatever fees. Anyone can opt-out of it. It would also be a pilot program, not some permanent thing. THINGS REMAIN THE SAME, YOU CAN CONTROL YOUR OWN COPYRIGHT. THERE IS NO LEGISLATION CURRENTLY BEFORE CONGRESS.
If you want to know more, check out this post .
Yes, as the aforementioned post's author says, knowledge is power.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
emma2899 [2015-07-20 23:27:22 +0000 UTC]
magiiical!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yuoaj009 [2015-07-20 21:35:56 +0000 UTC]
Very pretty! - Yuoaj009
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Springwomen [2015-07-20 14:09:57 +0000 UTC]
Magical
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
theheek [2015-07-20 04:14:12 +0000 UTC]
very cool
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>