Comments: 28
hampshires [2020-06-19 22:28:44 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nyarloth [2017-09-20 11:14:21 +0000 UTC]
It's funny, he remind me of the Hyaenodon, a great prehistoric hyena...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ThalassoAtrox [2016-05-02 18:00:27 +0000 UTC]
The Beast of Gevudan story had fascinated me for quite a while as well as the beast`s identity, but based on all the existing evidence it was probably just a large hound trained by one or a group of people to attack and kill villagers, stories about it being a werewolf or monstrous cow-sized gray wolf were just exagerations made up by the frightened peasants.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KingsOfEvilArt In reply to ThalassoAtrox [2016-05-02 18:40:37 +0000 UTC]
Based on the article I've read there were probably several beasts. At least one of them was apparently a Hyena based on identification of it's stuffed body in XIX century. Also the damage done to some victims could have only been done by a hyena.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ThalassoAtrox In reply to KingsOfEvilArt [2016-05-02 18:51:23 +0000 UTC]
It`s definantly possible that several large dogs were used, but I doubt any hyena was involved in it. Just what happened to the beast after death and if any examining was done to it`s body is vague and poorly documented, I never heard that it was stuffed and mounted and if that was true I think the beasts identity would have been common knowledge.
And don`t forget accounts about the damage inflicted on the victims mostly came from frightened, superstition villagers so I`m doubtfull that they weren`t exaggerated, alternatively they could have been made by the animals human masters.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KingsOfEvilArt In reply to ThalassoAtrox [2016-05-02 19:04:55 +0000 UTC]
Perhaps you'll find Karl Shuker's article interesting then. karlshuker.blogspot.com/2015/0…
"(...) this specimen had actually been exhibited there until at least 1819 (what happened to it afterwards, however, is unknown), and that during this time it had been conclusively identified – as a striped hyaena! Interestingly, a hyaena had long been favoured in the Gévaudan area as an identity for its nightmarish Beast, and could explain anecdotal accounts of its laughing cry, its large head, and hind limbs larger than forelimbs, but until now there had been no firm evidence to support it. Jullien published details of his significant find in the August 1998 issue of the journal Annales du Muséum du Havre."
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tiemnokryskin [2016-04-23 09:35:47 +0000 UTC]
It is a sort of ratwolf, I guess...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Broncallax [2016-04-23 03:18:19 +0000 UTC]
Good job, my friend~!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Chaosfive-55 [2016-04-22 23:11:58 +0000 UTC]
Well done! You've improved the beast considerably!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
grassa48 [2016-04-22 20:37:44 +0000 UTC]
The tail makes me think "Father of Remus and Romulus."
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
grassa48 In reply to KingsOfEvilArt [2016-04-23 18:01:48 +0000 UTC]
There is a famous statue that shows Romulus and Remus suckeling on a she-wolf. Something about the pose you chose reminded me of that statue. www.radiotimes.com/namedimage/…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KingsOfEvilArt In reply to grassa48 [2016-04-29 13:48:45 +0000 UTC]
Interesting association. I wasn't thinking of it, but it crossed my mind as I thought of archetype of wolf trough ages. Maybe was subconscious.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
grassa48 In reply to KingsOfEvilArt [2016-04-29 18:51:13 +0000 UTC]
Maybe, but it is still a magnificent drawing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0