HOME | DD

LDFranklin — Diana 1 5 Trees

Published: 2009-09-11 16:41:44 +0000 UTC; Views: 330; Favourites: 21; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Double exposure of a tree. (This was actually an accidental double exposure, but I really liked the way it came out!)

I took this photo using my Lomo Diana F+ on 35mm film.
Related content
Comments: 16

FddyWnks [2020-06-02 19:14:39 +0000 UTC]

I love the motion of the branches

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LDFranklin In reply to FddyWnks [2020-06-02 23:07:36 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ms-Underhill [2010-02-28 20:01:44 +0000 UTC]

May I ask what kind of scanner did you use for scanning this photo? I have a regular HP scanner but as far as I remember, the scanned negatives aren't in colour (yep, film noob )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LDFranklin In reply to Ms-Underhill [2010-02-28 21:19:24 +0000 UTC]

It's an Epson. I don't know the exact model. I'm not at home right now, but I can look it up next time I am.

I know there's a setting when I scan negatives to scan either black and white or color. Maybe your scanner has a similar setting?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ms-Underhill In reply to LDFranklin [2010-03-02 13:04:51 +0000 UTC]

I tried to scan some negatives but the scanner wouldn't work (typical!), I'll try connecting it to another computer when I'm home again. It should have the same settings as yours, Epson and HP are in the same price & quality range ... thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LDFranklin In reply to Ms-Underhill [2010-03-02 17:09:51 +0000 UTC]

Good luck figuring it out!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

shognog [2009-12-28 18:13:06 +0000 UTC]

i love the 35mm shots, theyre a great idea, how did you get them developed? just like any other 35mm photos?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LDFranklin In reply to shognog [2009-12-28 18:14:04 +0000 UTC]

Yup! They develop just like any 35mm film. But to get the sprocket holes in the pictures, I just scanned the negatives!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

shognog In reply to LDFranklin [2010-01-02 01:47:09 +0000 UTC]

ah ill have to try that.. ive just gotten a Diana F+, but im hearing that the 120 film is expensive to develop, the film itself was quite expensive anyway, so thanks. Might have a bit more money left to spare now

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LDFranklin In reply to shognog [2010-01-02 02:03:21 +0000 UTC]

If you don't want to worry about developing your film, you could get the Instant Back [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kjtgp1 [2009-09-12 13:40:53 +0000 UTC]

agreed awesome shot!! love the diana!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LDFranklin In reply to kjtgp1 [2009-09-12 17:47:19 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! This was from my very first roll I took using my Diana!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kjtgp1 In reply to LDFranklin [2009-09-14 23:45:05 +0000 UTC]

awesome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

camilah [2009-09-11 16:51:26 +0000 UTC]

These new pics are so cool

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LDFranklin In reply to camilah [2009-09-11 17:18:27 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

camilah In reply to LDFranklin [2009-09-11 17:23:07 +0000 UTC]

Welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0