Comments: 8
UltraStallion [2014-05-04 20:37:00 +0000 UTC]
Great drawing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BorisFedorov [2014-05-03 23:27:48 +0000 UTC]
Well it is an irony that most of the M-class planets have no logical ways of getting oxygen. But, as they say, Star Trek is a Space Fantasy series, so it's doesn't always have to follow the laws of science all the time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LEXLOTHOR In reply to BorisFedorov [2014-05-04 00:16:35 +0000 UTC]
Gene Roddenberry's ignorance of science is all over Star Trek. He confused the Herztsprung-Russel term M-Class star with a nonexistent planetary system classification. The NCC-1701 on the Enterprise is probably derived from "NGC" New General Catalog for nebula that replaced the Herschel and Messier systems. To his dying day Roddenberry denied that Dr. Benjamin Spock was the source of the name "Mr. Spock", but I refuse to believe him. He was a blatherskite of the first magnitude.
It was Frank Herbert who had no excuse when he created "Dune". He gave a lot of verbiage to planetary ecology, but Arakis has these giant sandworms and a breathable atmosphere but no plant life to speak of.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
UltraStallion In reply to LEXLOTHOR [2014-05-04 20:36:44 +0000 UTC]
Actually, there is a complex reason why there's NCC. Your reason is definitely not it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LEXLOTHOR In reply to UltraStallion [2014-05-04 23:40:57 +0000 UTC]
By all means enlighten me and convince me it wasn't something that was not conceived retroactively.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
UltraStallion In reply to LEXLOTHOR [2014-05-04 23:55:23 +0000 UTC]
Star Trek was being aired in the 1960's which was during the cold war. The US decided to designate all it's commercial ships with NC. Russia designated theirs with CC CC. The makers of Star Trek decided to combine them and made NCC.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BorisFedorov In reply to LEXLOTHOR [2014-05-04 00:27:34 +0000 UTC]
Understand, like for a planet to have a Earth like biodiversity of life. It must be pretty close to a star and not too far away.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0