Comments: 57
lovelycristina In reply to ??? [2008-03-17 07:14:18 +0000 UTC]
mine, too! yay!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
markramstead [2007-08-02 21:24:56 +0000 UTC]
This is a great painting!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lovelycristina In reply to Art-Queen [2007-08-02 17:08:25 +0000 UTC]
I opened the image to see if you are right. and yes, that sun is doing to bed!!! I thought it's a sunset..... oh, I am joking. thank you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hitsugayahinamori [2007-07-05 09:39:23 +0000 UTC]
what do u use for the texture? it's very lovely
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cartof [2007-06-25 16:36:04 +0000 UTC]
foarte misto... imi place.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Isa-san [2007-06-12 12:52:14 +0000 UTC]
uuUUuu, it looks so cool, is the brigth wet paper or something?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lovelycristina In reply to Isa-san [2007-06-13 03:43:01 +0000 UTC]
it's pieces of canvas.......
thank you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
little-tansan [2007-06-10 12:33:37 +0000 UTC]
really cool..did you use plaster of paris?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lovelycristina In reply to little-tansan [2007-06-10 12:45:22 +0000 UTC]
no, it's just pieces of cloth, melted in clay! haha..... I work with what I have around!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AlmightyGammy [2007-06-09 02:03:05 +0000 UTC]
The feelings your work evokes are truly amazing.
Just. Gorgeous.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
faizan [2007-06-08 16:22:10 +0000 UTC]
i feel like touching the canvas now,
and thats why traditional art ROCKS because you can touch your thoughts.
for digital art even, when only its printed i can hold in my hand and frame.
depends on personal taste. i am ok with both, its just that for me i like to make my own materials and brushes and my own board because of its raw form and texture. thats what i see here. the raw form of thoughts, because thoughts can never be perfect. its kindof blurred.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
faizan In reply to faizan [2007-06-08 16:46:01 +0000 UTC]
hm. for blur i was talking about both actually, technically and superficially l0ls i really dont know whether this terminology exists or no. i mean to say. blurred as dreams arent focused. there is a slight blur and in dreams we try to focus hard sometimes, what are we looking actually. so there will be only one point we see kind of visible and other parts not focused. i was talking about more towards subject of painting as symbology, sometimes signs are there and we think what it means according to intellectual interpretation.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lovelycristina In reply to faizan [2007-06-08 16:37:12 +0000 UTC]
you're right.
the blur... it's from my digital. and I am not so good in taking pictures. and it's for sure that this fact dammages a little my works. lol.
but... as I said on "celebration"... live looks better. truth.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Venet [2007-06-05 06:43:12 +0000 UTC]
great work
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ankteodorescu [2007-05-31 15:46:05 +0000 UTC]
This is just great!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
gensanity [2007-05-24 02:46:55 +0000 UTC]
love it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
abuseofreason [2007-05-23 15:00:39 +0000 UTC]
outstanding!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>