HOME | DD

hikaru-nara-kheel In reply to KibaPandaRo [2012-09-28 17:13:52 +0000 UTC]

it's not his fault he got a dd, stop hating on him

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KibaPandaRo In reply to hikaru-nara-kheel [2012-09-28 17:16:11 +0000 UTC]

uhm im not hating im just sayng my opinion, im not bonud to have the same opinon as the others right? and i dont hate him ive seen his galery and he has other better photos, just saying

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Bubblesey In reply to KibaPandaRo [2012-09-28 16:50:23 +0000 UTC]

the deviant isn't the one who awarded themself the DD so posting something like this is unfair, you should take it up with who awarded the DD if you have an issue with it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KibaPandaRo In reply to Bubblesey [2012-09-28 16:54:54 +0000 UTC]

uhm im not sure i understand what you mean, i thought the DD are awarded to those who get alot of apreciation from other users not just by being recommending by someone

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Somnilocus In reply to KibaPandaRo [2012-09-29 01:51:54 +0000 UTC]

DD's aren't awarded to people based on how popular their art is. There are a select group of people on dA who have the responsibility of picking out what they think is exceptional art (which can mean many things -- not necessarily technical ability, or uniqueness, or whatever). It might have 1 view and 1 comment, or thousands. To argue over whether a picture or artist "deserves" a DD is like getting pissed over everyone on the kids baseball team getting a trophy at the end of the year even when they came in last. It's not like it's some internationally recognized award that grants the artist a bazillion dollars and unquestionable title of "Artist of the Universe." Sheesh. XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Bubblesey In reply to KibaPandaRo [2012-09-28 17:07:11 +0000 UTC]

A DD can be suggested by just one or by hundreds of people, whether it get's awarded or not is down to the DA mod with the privileges to do so. If that mod has decided that it is worthy of a DD and thus awarded one, is it not better to take up any discrepancies you have about the decision with said mod rather than putting the artist/photographer down by saying that 'in your opinion their work doesn't deserve it'. That is what I meant. It is very unfair to the one who is happy to have been awarded such a thing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KibaPandaRo In reply to Bubblesey [2012-09-28 17:20:01 +0000 UTC]

he has other better art in his galery, i personally dont like modern art because as you might know, (gonig a little with extreme) 1 dot on a white canvas maens art...which i find BS and i find this thing to be somthing close to that idea, thats why i expressed my opinion of dissagreement, also i dont intend to put the user down, he is not a bad artist, i just dont agree with this specific submit getting a DD. i dont say it out of jealousy if that what you think, i just dnot think its DD worthy, also the DD should be appointed by the dA comunity not by a person but who am i to tell people what to do, i just state it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Bubblesey In reply to KibaPandaRo [2012-09-28 17:37:56 +0000 UTC]

I am not saying that you have no right to state your opinion. You simply went about it the incorrect way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KibaPandaRo In reply to Bubblesey [2012-09-28 17:42:21 +0000 UTC]

Well I'm sorry about that,here ill give you a llama peace? no joke intended

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AnaNaszynska In reply to KibaPandaRo [2012-09-28 14:35:00 +0000 UTC]

Sounds like this comment was addressed to me. So in the future I'd prefer if you left them on my page instead.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ametladocea In reply to KibaPandaRo [2012-09-28 14:08:23 +0000 UTC]

I totally agree. I find that a lot of DDs are unworthy and that there are a lot of other people that deserve a DD and more attention.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KibaPandaRo In reply to ametladocea [2012-09-28 14:14:14 +0000 UTC]

well modern art has its good artists but from what ive seen most of it its something with no deep meaning or no creativity. anyway hopefully the next generation of art will be better andi think it will be seeing quite alot of new original artists in all categories

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AmebaPico In reply to KibaPandaRo [2012-09-28 17:00:40 +0000 UTC]

Just because you don't understand it and can't see its worth doesn't mean everyone feels that way. Art is subjective, your opinion is not the end-all be-all of opinions. I understand you're just voicing your opinion, however, your comments are more about the reward and not the art itself, and therefor are not very constructive. This is why you should message the person who recommended the DD, which you can find out just by reading the DD under the description.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KibaPandaRo In reply to AmebaPico [2012-09-28 17:14:55 +0000 UTC]

well i was trying to refer both to the reward and art type itself, sorry if i didnt do it properly,also i believe i have the right to express my opinion.

also one person recomemded it to be DD, and thats all it takes for it to become DD, a single recomendation?

to be honest im not sure how DD system works, still i believe ppl need to like the art for it to become DD no?

and i am surprized to see so many ppl thinking that its like a WOW thing, i mean he has other better submits in his galery why this? what do they find so amazing about this? im just curious, i want smoeone who finds this fascinating to explain to me and mayeb i could apreciate it more idk

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

AmebaPico In reply to KibaPandaRo [2012-09-29 05:08:08 +0000 UTC]

Well, personally I'm not into it. However, I do have a open mind and I do like actually trying to see what is there instead of just jumping up and getting angry.

Architecture IS an art, tell me have you ever seen a building with such randomly spread windows and window sizes? I certainly have not, it is actually really fascinating to see. The lines and the building is so unique alone. Even though it's a crazy spread, it's somehow even too. It's interesting to think about living there too, how many windows would your living room have?

It also hits hard on people with OCD phobias. This image may not appeal to you and that's fine, but it does appeal to others and the big issue I have with your comment is you don't think it deserves a DD simply because >>YOU<< don't like it. Yes he may have other/better submissions but it doesn't devalue this one.

The DD system is very simple, someone simply refers it and then an admin decides if it should get a DD.
Just as you have the right to express your opinion I have the right to express my opinion on your opinion. ;D

____________________________________________________________
Here are some comments you may have missed that see the artistic value:

"what a fascinating and curious image
its hard to believe such a building with this window layout exists!"

"Wow. So sorry for the unappreciative comments, Marco. I hope you'll forgive them. I myself can salvage a lot of ideas and emotions from this image. I have a strange phobia of "clusters" (seriously) so I am repulsed by the image, and by that I mean that it's enormously interesting! The hive of windows filled with ghosts and forbidden places have succeeding in uprooting my personal comfort. While the residents go about their lives, possibly unaware of the chaos, the viewer is able to behold the truth from a more withdrawn perspective. Disorder indeed. It has certainly made me think about what it means to live in it. Thank you for the grand piece of art, and many congrats on the DD. You really did deserve it."

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KibaPandaRo In reply to AmebaPico [2012-09-29 06:42:33 +0000 UTC]

i understand what you mean, you made your point quite well and i can admit defeatm i still dont particularly like this kind of thing because it doesnt give me any kind of emotion, but i understand the >>ME<< idea : ))

i didnt jump up and get angry at first, my first comm was just expressing my thought on the idea, i think i got angry because of others replies though i think i should've expected it, im not very experienced with these kind of debates : ))

anyway thanks for puttin me up to date with a pleasant attitude, ill try to work on mine

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Harseik In reply to KibaPandaRo [2012-09-29 00:15:11 +0000 UTC]

View my comment above.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AnaNaszynska In reply to Majatek [2012-09-28 13:34:35 +0000 UTC]

I would've appreciated if you addressed this matter to me personally, since it was my choice and no one else's.
I hope you'll consider this in the future.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Majatek In reply to AnaNaszynska [2012-09-28 13:54:45 +0000 UTC]

But... Opinions...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AnaNaszynska In reply to Majatek [2012-09-28 14:22:54 +0000 UTC]

Opinions are great; just express them in the proper place.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Majatek In reply to AnaNaszynska [2012-09-28 14:23:57 +0000 UTC]

Like the public? Or am I not allowed to have freedom of speech?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AnaNaszynska In reply to Majatek [2012-09-28 14:32:07 +0000 UTC]

You can leave these comments on my page; I don't mind.
They're public and visible to everyone. I just think it's best not to spoil someone's day saying that their DD wasn't well deserved.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Majatek In reply to AnaNaszynska [2012-09-28 15:06:31 +0000 UTC]

Something not being DD worthy is exclusive from someone deserving a DD (or not).

This is just one of his works (not particularly his best either). There are plenty better pieces in his gallery.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AnaNaszynska In reply to Majatek [2012-09-28 15:24:20 +0000 UTC]

That doesn't really answer my comment..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1