Comments: 6
Sarcastastic [2006-04-29 20:27:01 +0000 UTC]
I don't know, Dooku gives a more evil air and a crazy sheming guy like Lee did with Saruman. And I would prefer to see Thrawn as the first chiss in movies rather than her.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sarcastastic In reply to MarcusStarkiller [2006-04-30 15:28:59 +0000 UTC]
now that I've said my bit I forgot to mention that it was a good picture.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MarcusStarkiller [2004-08-27 03:40:55 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, and I do agree that Sev'rance Tann should have been in the movie. She would have been the first Chiss of the silver screen.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Druce-White-Owl [2004-08-26 23:06:49 +0000 UTC]
Sev'Rance Tann.. you Sir are a god among SW Artists, one of my all time favorite characters... The real kicker is that she was the original sith apprentice for Episode two, you can even see concept art for her in a few Making of Episode II books, unfortunately Lucas changed his mind for some reason and called in Christopher Lee to play Count Dooku..
As cool as he is he's a blantant combonation of Count Dracula and Saruman which showed just how low on inspiration George apparently was after he scrapped the idea of having Tann as a lead villainess.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0