HOME | DD

markkarvon β€” Stratosphere Recon

#aviationart #flight #flting #junkers #luftwaffe #recon #wwii #karvon
Published: 2017-11-12 04:49:37 +0000 UTC; Views: 8155; Favourites: 267; Downloads: 126
Redirect to original
Description The Junkers JU 388 StΓΆrtebeker was based on the versatile Ju 88 airframe and the Ju 188 evolution of that frame. It was intended for use in multiple roles including night fighter, bomber destroyer and reconnaissance. The Ju 388L model depicted here is the reconnaissance version. Developed late in the war, the Ju 388L was built in small numbers (about 47 machines being produced). It was undergoing extensive testing and was not yet deployed at the war's end. None the less, the JU 388 was an excellent machine with maximum boost speed of 407 MPH and a service ceiling of 44,095 feet. I have long wanted to paint this aircraft which I think is one of the best looking of its era. This artwork depicts the Ju 388L at high altitude with Me 262 jet fighter escort. Prints are available through my website, www.markkarvon.net.
Related content
Comments: 37

PixelPabzki [2022-05-22 04:32:02 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Medjugore [2020-04-13 08:56:36 +0000 UTC]

Nice planes indeed

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ghost-Studio-Devs [2018-07-08 17:20:06 +0000 UTC]

pretty design

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Jimbowyrick1 [2018-02-10 00:01:00 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful illustration!
Go totally "Luft '46" on this, and design your own 688, or 788, or 1088, offshoot!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

markkarvon In reply to Jimbowyrick1 [2018-02-12 03:00:24 +0000 UTC]

Thank you. I have a couple of Luft '46 machines already in mind. Hopefully I can get to them one day.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

artlovr59 [2017-12-18 09:32:46 +0000 UTC]

Verrry nice!
I like the planes, but I also like your use of colours, where the planes' camo fits in with the blue sky. Nice!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

markkarvon In reply to artlovr59 [2018-02-12 02:58:53 +0000 UTC]

Thank you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

artlovr59 In reply to markkarvon [2018-02-12 09:10:21 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mecengineer [2017-12-08 17:51:20 +0000 UTC]

excellent

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Lady-Pilot [2017-11-20 11:17:12 +0000 UTC]

Can you provide the max altitute in metric?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

HoremWeb In reply to Lady-Pilot [2017-12-19 18:28:04 +0000 UTC]

13440 mΒ 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Lady-Pilot In reply to HoremWeb [2017-12-20 11:51:46 +0000 UTC]

Interesting...not looks like much but when you consider when the aircraft flown...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

shenanigan87 [2017-11-14 21:01:59 +0000 UTC]

Very nice rendition! Never expected to see one of these being drawn by you, considering how few were built.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

paws4thot [2017-11-13 14:50:30 +0000 UTC]

"Duxford control, we have trade for you. Bogies 2 Angels 44 making three eight zero. Immediate scramble vector 15 buster to intercept."

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Clu-art [2017-11-13 12:47:32 +0000 UTC]

excellent work Mark
from the Ju 88 family I always liked the idea of the Ju 88-P1 with the 7,5 cm ATG
reibert.info/attachments/ju88p…
forum.warthunder.com/uploads/m…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

markkarvon In reply to Clu-art [2017-11-14 04:18:29 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much. I like the tank-buster Ju 88 too.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Enterprise206 [2017-11-13 02:48:06 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful. And what's awesome is that there is still one of these beauties around in storage. Β And hopefully will soon be restored and displayed for generation'sΒ 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

markkarvon In reply to Enterprise206 [2017-11-14 04:18:01 +0000 UTC]

Thank you. Yes, I am looking forward to the day they have it restored.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Midway2009 [2017-11-12 20:03:18 +0000 UTC]

Totally awesome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

markkarvon In reply to Midway2009 [2017-11-14 04:16:35 +0000 UTC]

Thank you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Midway2009 In reply to markkarvon [2017-11-14 08:13:25 +0000 UTC]

you're welcome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

slowdog294 [2017-11-12 17:33:32 +0000 UTC]

Epic.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

markkarvon In reply to slowdog294 [2017-11-14 04:16:25 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

slowdog294 In reply to markkarvon [2017-11-14 04:30:18 +0000 UTC]

You are most welcome, Sir.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

davincipoppalag [2017-11-12 10:13:39 +0000 UTC]

GReat looking work

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Lyle462 In reply to davincipoppalag [2017-11-12 13:40:31 +0000 UTC]

Excellent Mark!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

davincipoppalag In reply to Lyle462 [2017-11-12 13:52:22 +0000 UTC]

you musta sent this on a phone app.. I'm always gettin comments intended for the artist that way?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Lyle462 In reply to davincipoppalag [2017-11-12 18:49:58 +0000 UTC]

Yes I did! Crazy!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

davincipoppalag In reply to Lyle462 [2017-11-12 19:11:13 +0000 UTC]

That phone app has a few bugs, I think!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

paws4thot In reply to davincipoppalag [2017-11-13 14:51:30 +0000 UTC]

Also Lyle462 - Just the one, but it occurs regularly.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Lyle462 In reply to davincipoppalag [2017-11-12 23:28:35 +0000 UTC]

I’d say so!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Rainy-Raptor [2017-11-12 05:59:41 +0000 UTC]

Say what you want about the Germans, they knew how to build beautiful aircraft.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

markkarvon In reply to Rainy-Raptor [2017-11-14 04:16:19 +0000 UTC]

Yes they did for sure.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Enterprise206 In reply to Rainy-Raptor [2017-11-13 02:49:21 +0000 UTC]

So does the brits and us AmericansΒ 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rainy-Raptor In reply to Enterprise206 [2017-11-13 11:14:00 +0000 UTC]

True, but there's a strange beauty about this one, and I can't quite place it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MensjeDeZeemeermin [2017-11-12 05:58:42 +0000 UTC]

Lovely aircraft attitudes, depth of field, and integration with the background.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

markkarvon In reply to MensjeDeZeemeermin [2017-11-14 04:15:56 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0