Comments: 22
RiotRandy [2016-12-09 16:54:33 +0000 UTC]
Competitive gaming is just so cancerous.
I do question why you bother with tournaments though... after seeing all of this.
I hate anything related to competitive or tournament play though so that's probably just my instincts.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MasterKnightDH In reply to RiotRandy [2016-12-20 02:18:58 +0000 UTC]
Oh, I don't participate in tournaments. People just talk about gameplay like you have to be exploitive tournament scumbags to have a valid opinion. Rather hard to get around that. It gets to the point where I make a list of Cloud's weaknesses and people claim I just suck at the game and don't understand a damn thing, please ignore how Cloud gets the complaining he deserves in his gameplay alone.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MegaSparkZX [2015-07-25 20:21:40 +0000 UTC]
They're just people who doesn't want to have fun. what's the point of that?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SleeplessNight10 [2014-03-27 14:24:39 +0000 UTC]
Oh no you have to get first place or be good to get payed with a prize WHO WOULD HAVE GUESSED!?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MasterKnightDH In reply to SleeplessNight10 [2014-03-29 04:00:02 +0000 UTC]
Oh I'm sorry. I can't hear you over you claiming I'm ranting about prize money itself when the only thing CTRL+F churns up is my comment about having to spend to go to tournaments, thus turning FIRST PRIZE into a zero-sum game when SSB is imbalanced. Yeah, no, I don't think so.
Also, I'm going to laugh off your claim that I suck and go back to playing Kid Icarus Uprising to pwn more of the idiots there. By the way, matches there are about 2 minutes long each and I used Black Hole on a guy who coincidentally used Energy Charge twice as well as Tirelessness, Slip Shot, and Quick Charge, a combination I actually was unfamiliar with. I happened to have suddenly spammed it on the guy, so no doubt I'm some idiot who got lucky to have killed him twice as a result.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SleeplessNight10 In reply to MasterKnightDH [2014-03-29 18:14:34 +0000 UTC]
How does that Kid Icarus stuff relate to anything at all. And Christ did you say it in excruciating detail.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MasterKnightDH In reply to SleeplessNight10 [2014-04-02 15:35:34 +0000 UTC]
Well, you're claiming I deserve to lose money in so much as triple digits amounts of dollars just because I'm not one of the "better" players at a game that proves imbalanced.
And yes, SSB IS excessively imbalanced. Let's compare to Kid Icarus Uprising. That game still has imbalanced stages like Windy Wasteland. It still has cheap items like Daybreak and the Smart Bomb. It still has stupid things like Evasion+ which allows for mindless wins that can't be dealt with by something like Grid Reading. And it still has KITING. Yet even though most of my matches are on randoms, my win-loss ratio exceeds 2:1 because I can both get an idea of what is going on and how to fight back. And it has NOTHING to do with the chance that I'm being ghey somehow with something like Shot Cancel+ Brawler Claws, because I use a freaking Skyscraper Club, totally the best weapon ever for hitting anybody. That totally doesn't need Black Hole, a power that is even blocked off from usefulness by various powers to the point where if it did need it I would need to come up with a concept called Grid Reading so that those powers can't throw me off.
Can SSB say it has a counterbalancing factor like KIU managed with Grid Reading? I know DI ain't it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SleeplessNight10 In reply to MasterKnightDH [2014-04-02 22:41:05 +0000 UTC]
You're comparing a fighting game to a third person shooter, completely different genres with completely different game mechanics.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MasterKnightDH In reply to SleeplessNight10 [2014-04-03 03:06:27 +0000 UTC]
When KIU uses SSB mechanics like the ukemi and smash attacks to begin with.
What does SSB do to make sure guys like Bowser, ROB, and Link don't suck anyway? That has nothing to do with genre.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SleeplessNight10 In reply to MasterKnightDH [2014-04-03 03:27:22 +0000 UTC]
Those characters are completely capable of not being shit when they're used correctly.
It's starting to sound like you just don't want to get better at the game and instead expect it to cover your ass in every situation you make a bad choice. You shouldn't expect a fighting game to keep every character equal in every aspect ever, that's an unrealistic expectation and a retarded one at that.
Also as a response to a part of your last reply, if you're going to put money into a competitive tournament you should at least be GOOD at the game whose tournament you participated in if you want to get some money in return, that is how this shit works.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MasterKnightDH In reply to SleeplessNight10 [2014-04-17 05:01:35 +0000 UTC]
That's funny how after having tier lists putting characters like Link so low that you claim they can stand against general beeswax such as chaingrabs. Oh hey, the key to using characters whose strengths get wasted if they never get hit is to not get hit. Oh wait, THAT DOESN'T WORK!
I expect the game to reward me for working with preference, NOT for abusing something everybody does.
And hey, how about this: SSB needs to actually not have bullshit like unconditional flinching in the first place. It has that, so I have every right complain without needing to spend TRAVEL MONEY.
How about YOU prove the characters can miraculously work in general. Kid Icarus Uprising needs a META-MECHANIC to make things manageable for power weapons. What does SSB do to fix the damned issue?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MetalSmasher86 [2013-02-28 04:42:25 +0000 UTC]
I consider myself somewhat of a competitive gamer, but I wholeheartedly respect my opponents, no matter what tactics they use or how good they are. Stop Having Fun Guys give not only hardcore and competitive gamers a bad name, but they give gamers in general a bad name as well. You think Smash Bros. SHFGs are stupid? Check out this message some SHFG sent to Activision calling for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 to lock out anybody whose Kill/Death ratio is less than 3.0 from playing online at all:
"We only demand that we should only be able to play against those who have shown themselves to be of superior skill and mind such as ourselves. Beasting against the scrub's in random games get's boring since they really don't know their place and they really don't do anything correctly other than feed us effortless kill's over and over again. This new system would see them staying where they belong, circle-jerking with heir scrub friends offline over what's cheap while we, the true and rightful owners of MW2 compete amongst the best of the best in true, glorious combat with pride and honor on the line."
Now THAT is arrogance at its absolute worst. Screw those people.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MetalSmasher86 In reply to MetalSmasher86 [2013-02-28 04:44:57 +0000 UTC]
Sorry for the double post, but when I submitted it the first time it asked me to log in, and I didn't realize logging in also submitted the message.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MetalSmasher86 [2013-02-28 04:38:45 +0000 UTC]
You think Smash Bros. SHFGs are stupid? Check out this message some SHFG sent to Activision calling for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 to lock out anybody whose Kill/Death ratio is less than 3.0 from playing online at all:
"We only demand that we should only be able to play against those who have shown themselves to be of superior skill and mind such as ourselves. Beasting against the scrub's in random games get's boring since they really don't know their place and they really don't do anything correctly other than feed us effortless kill's over and over again. This new system would see them staying where they belong, circle-jerking with heir scrub friends offline over what's cheap while we, the true and rightful owners of MW2 compete amongst the best of the best in true, glorious combat with pride and honor on the line."
Now THAT is arrogance at its absolute worst. Screw those people.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
cylun [2011-04-03 06:53:54 +0000 UTC]
DI exists
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MasterKnightDH In reply to cylun [2011-06-04 17:35:30 +0000 UTC]
Hey, telling me DI exists is a great idea. Hey, while we're at it, you can also watch my Advance Wars videos and then tell me that Light Tanks and AA Tanks exist.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Fofa [2010-07-20 06:16:43 +0000 UTC]
Yes, I have to agree with this post: the SHFG are arrogant bullies who are like trolls in using the internet to get away with a lot of what they do, but also wreck people who just want to have fun, which is what I do. I don't abuse glitches or overlooked tactics; I just fight with my own wits.
"If I wanted to die every time I made a mistake, even one that shows the "right" move is in fact horribly counterintuitive, I'd just go and play I Wanna Be The Guy."
That statement made me laugh.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MasterKnightDH In reply to Fofa [2010-07-23 04:36:01 +0000 UTC]
Exploits, you mean, not overlooked tactics, which could end up meaning anything. But yeah, fighting with your own wits is always better.
Nice to know I made you laugh.
And meanwhile...
"remember, no-one ever gets hit by any move slower than 8 frames, because that's theoretical human reaction time"
Yes, another shining bit of intelligence from Smashboards. I'll add it to the rant. Yes, I know, you may seem confused, but I'll get to it soon.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Fofa In reply to MasterKnightDH [2010-07-23 06:05:01 +0000 UTC]
I've never played with those SHFG people at all, so I don't really know about what means what.
"'remember, no-one ever gets hit by any move slower than 8 frames, because that's theoretical human reaction time'
Yes, another shining bit of intelligence from Smashboards. I'll add it to the rant. Yes, I know, you may seem confused, but I'll get to it soon."
Forehead, meet my desk (WHAM!) People don't have instant reactions like our video game characters do!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Klobb17 [2010-07-20 05:52:30 +0000 UTC]
*low whistle* It took me a while to realize this was for Super Smash Bros., lol
Though, I guess this could apply to anything, really. And not just to video games, either. After a quick glance, all of the points seem valid. I'll be honest, though, I've only played SSB: B twice, both times offline and with friends. I DO know one thing, however: Tiers are for qweers!
And, I can only assume this is for some flame-war on another site?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MasterKnightDH In reply to Klobb17 [2010-07-20 06:11:06 +0000 UTC]
You read the whole thing quickly?
*sigh* Anyway, I'm letting off some steam. There's only so much a person can take after all.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Klobb17 In reply to MasterKnightDH [2010-07-20 06:13:50 +0000 UTC]
I'll be honest, I didn't read all of it (it IS a rant, after all...). I skipped from point to point, checking every little bit. I also have a shit resolution on my monitor, so a third of the page was invisible.
But hey, what I did read, was alright.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0