HOME | DD

missmjwilson β€” Rejected by JET

Published: 2013-04-17 03:19:38 +0000 UTC; Views: 1409; Favourites: 45; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Shot with the intentions of being selected for JET magazine...rejected...
Related content
Comments: 21

waynemiller-jr [2019-04-16 23:15:36 +0000 UTC]

Their big loss! I have to thank you for posting your pictures my dear. This world needs all the beauty it can get and you fill it with some of the best beauty there is!!!! Don’t stop PLEASE!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DarthSparrow [2013-05-01 22:05:59 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sketchbooksage [2013-04-30 04:13:39 +0000 UTC]

Why JET....why?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

victortky [2013-04-21 13:25:04 +0000 UTC]

You look perfect in this picture, oh well their loss.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

missmjwilson In reply to victortky [2013-04-25 03:03:05 +0000 UTC]

thank you hunny!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

victortky In reply to missmjwilson [2013-04-25 14:41:53 +0000 UTC]

nice hairstyle, I like your smile the best.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Kenichi2point0 [2013-04-19 23:59:38 +0000 UTC]

S'okay, their loss and a their readers' loss even more.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

vegiboy3000 [2013-04-17 21:45:40 +0000 UTC]

Just that smile alone is wonderful . Magazine owners/editors need a reality check because you are a Real full blooded woman. Powerful, graceful, kind, tough, sexy, romantic, intelligent...need I say more?

(sorry. Hope I'm not overdoing it. I wanted to kind and supportive not borderline creepy X o)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ErikArtFan72 [2013-04-17 14:21:43 +0000 UTC]

Aw, that's a real shame that JET magazine could reject someone as gorgeous as you. I think you look absolutely gorgeous in that bikini and it's very sad that anyone could reject you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

missmjwilson In reply to ErikArtFan72 [2013-04-17 19:02:42 +0000 UTC]

i appreciate you saying this. when it comes to magazines, there's no telling.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Kaedegirl [2013-04-17 11:32:56 +0000 UTC]

why would they reject this picture?! you look stunning MJ

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

missmjwilson In reply to Kaedegirl [2013-04-17 19:02:15 +0000 UTC]

i dunno, AMerica has weird standards of beauty...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaedegirl In reply to missmjwilson [2013-04-18 10:58:51 +0000 UTC]

they do have this is so weird, you are perfect

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

missmjwilson In reply to Kaedegirl [2013-04-21 12:32:36 +0000 UTC]

AWWW

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

shnoogums5060 [2013-04-17 03:21:18 +0000 UTC]

Rejected? Why? You do look fabulous in that photo, Miss MJ.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

missmjwilson In reply to shnoogums5060 [2013-04-17 03:24:06 +0000 UTC]

Magazines are weird i guess. i guess i don't look fake enough for 'em

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

shnoogums5060 In reply to missmjwilson [2013-04-17 03:25:00 +0000 UTC]

Fake? This is about being fake (sorry if i'm curious about what you're mentioning here)?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

missmjwilson In reply to shnoogums5060 [2013-04-17 10:49:23 +0000 UTC]

overly photoshopped

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

shnoogums5060 In reply to missmjwilson [2013-04-17 20:07:18 +0000 UTC]

Overly photoshopped? I don't see anything overly photoshopped in your pictures, Miss MJ.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

missmjwilson In reply to shnoogums5060 [2013-04-17 21:19:13 +0000 UTC]

let me break it down to you. current magazines prefer pictures that are photoshopped til the woman looks like a bloodless doll. None of the three pics that i have posted portray this look. I look too real, too natural and that is a turn off to them.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

shnoogums5060 In reply to missmjwilson [2013-04-17 22:40:40 +0000 UTC]

Oh, i see. Well, in any case, they don't know what they're missing.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0