Comments: 11
antiandy [2009-02-23 17:01:18 +0000 UTC]
Love the slowness of its revolutions.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
nonparticipant In reply to antiandy [2009-02-24 01:57:02 +0000 UTC]
me too, ton of frames, for just a 180 over and a 180 back around, actually a frame per degree of rotation. seems liek alot of people have had issues loading my animations, I figured 320x240 would be small enough that 360 frames wouldn't be a problem but I guess I was wrong. I've said I might put it on youtube or something, but i dunno that i really want to since you tube is 15 frames a second and the animation was rendered to be 30 frames a second, I'd be throwing out half the frames. dilema. I mean I could just extend it the length of it by makign it 15 frames a second befor emaking it into a video but then it'd be slow as molases, the speed now is good enough, oh well, I'll figure something out, maybe a rerender in 640x480 but at 15 fps instead of 30? we'll see....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1