Comments: 144
oh-juliet In reply to ??? [2014-07-10 20:42:30 +0000 UTC]
yes they are !
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Earleywine [2012-05-30 14:04:56 +0000 UTC]
a shit pot of babies. That is how many. hahaha Seriously, I don't think I have ever seen a pair with that many
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ragingviolence In reply to oh-juliet [2011-12-03 04:14:49 +0000 UTC]
ooooooOOOOOOOoooo I see haha I didn't know that they babysat! That's so cute! :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
maxxy12 [2011-09-30 18:34:35 +0000 UTC]
waw! they got busy! haha XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AKFrostwriter [2011-08-05 22:17:12 +0000 UTC]
Woah! It's a plague on the rise! This would be my worst nightmare, I hate these friggin things.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
oskila In reply to oh-juliet [2011-06-10 23:51:01 +0000 UTC]
Well, ornithologist do the darnedest things. It's not entirely unheard of for an ornithologist to take a wide angle picture of a flock of say about a thousand starlings and go home and count them to make sure they don't mess up the statistics figures...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ExplodingSnowHorse [2011-04-09 18:20:36 +0000 UTC]
That's a lot of little peep cheeps...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MeaganEmerson [2011-03-31 03:37:07 +0000 UTC]
--"ARE WE THERE YET??"
No.
--"ARE WE THERE YET??"
No.
--"ARE WE THERE YET??"
No.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>