HOME | DD

Olotocolo — Binary Signet

Published: 2012-02-09 14:11:52 +0000 UTC; Views: 818; Favourites: 9; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Fast idea for ring. I'm not sure it went well...

Why binary? Diamond has 16-point ring on top, and 32-point on side. Rubies have 8/4.

Made in blender 2.61 & Cycles
2560:1600
render 1:30h
2500 verticles
Related content
Comments: 19

johnblunt [2012-02-29 21:58:53 +0000 UTC]

Nice render! is that rendered in blender native or did you render with yafray?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Olotocolo In reply to johnblunt [2012-03-01 00:02:55 +0000 UTC]

Cycles

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fear-is-spreading [2012-02-15 09:26:35 +0000 UTC]

This may be a moot point if you're not using a simpler mesh with some kind of smoothing action added (I'm not familiar with Blender) but I'm not liking the irregular shape of the metal in the inset around the gems. It could be rounder, smoother. Also, I agree with Al-Kabeer; the background isn't working for this.

I like to set the negative comments first so now I'll go into what I like about it.

It's incredibly engaging. The gem placement is pretty nice and really makes you look. I like the unique setting. Your rendering did go well, with all your reflections it really adds to the illusion of reality. Concept is great.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Olotocolo In reply to fear-is-spreading [2012-02-15 12:43:53 +0000 UTC]

Around gems is complicated form, and maybe it should be seen from different angle.

I chcanged many things in it, but I have to wait until I came back to render it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Al-Kabeer [2012-02-13 14:02:39 +0000 UTC]

Nicely Done ....... Mixing with background; make some difference !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Olotocolo In reply to Al-Kabeer [2012-02-13 22:00:01 +0000 UTC]

It will be gold

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

angelicmanor [2012-02-12 18:24:26 +0000 UTC]

i like the general design of the ring but your materials could use a bit of help. The silver on the ring looks entirely fake, you can fix this by not seeing the emission plane. also if you had more contrast shadow it would look better

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Olotocolo In reply to angelicmanor [2012-02-12 22:13:02 +0000 UTC]

Well it needs some tweaking with nearly everything. I will upload updated version in short time.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

grizato [2012-02-10 13:42:54 +0000 UTC]

Yes, it does look pretty good!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Olotocolo In reply to grizato [2012-02-10 14:43:03 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MisturSuperstar [2012-02-09 20:37:27 +0000 UTC]

Looks great....from what I can see. The ugly watermark covers all of the detail. :/

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Olotocolo In reply to MisturSuperstar [2012-02-09 20:47:31 +0000 UTC]

hmm...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Olotocolo In reply to Olotocolo [2012-02-09 20:49:35 +0000 UTC]

Fixed!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

claycaustic [2012-02-09 17:12:16 +0000 UTC]

Holy shit. This is awesome. I only half believe it is 3D. WHat program do you use?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Olotocolo In reply to claycaustic [2012-02-09 20:33:35 +0000 UTC]

Blender 2.61, and rendering with Cycles. maybe, when I return tu my second flat when I have good PC I will make it better. Diamod should look better. Also, maybe it should be gold?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

claycaustic In reply to Olotocolo [2012-03-05 17:19:57 +0000 UTC]

i would do a gold as well but the silver is awesome. I do not see any flaws in the modeling. Blew me away.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Olotocolo In reply to claycaustic [2012-03-05 19:12:01 +0000 UTC]

Thx!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BlastedScavenger [2012-02-09 14:15:16 +0000 UTC]

Blender! Nice!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Olotocolo In reply to BlastedScavenger [2012-02-09 20:31:44 +0000 UTC]

Thx!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0